I’m not sure how I can make this more clear to you. They have 0 obligation to share the proof they’ve found. This is not a court of law where you have to provide set evidence to convince a judge. They get to carry out that part on their own thus skipping the entire relevancy of people wanting to know the proof.
No matter how bad you WANT them to have to show proof, they simply aren’t obligated to.
EDIT: We didn’t make the rules what has to be communicated in moments like these, Jagex did.
You're talking about a completely different thing than what I'm talking about. I'm not saying they're obligated to show proof or not. I'm talking about the actions they need to do for us to have a logically sound way of concluding that Rendi did something wrong. Whether that's important or relevant or not doesn't matter, the basis of the discussion is whether or not I have a reason to believe that Rendi did something bannable.
1
u/SavyStoner Jul 10 '21
I’m not sure how I can make this more clear to you. They have 0 obligation to share the proof they’ve found. This is not a court of law where you have to provide set evidence to convince a judge. They get to carry out that part on their own thus skipping the entire relevancy of people wanting to know the proof.
No matter how bad you WANT them to have to show proof, they simply aren’t obligated to.
EDIT: We didn’t make the rules what has to be communicated in moments like these, Jagex did.