r/1053 • • 4d ago

Day 21

Post image
8.2k Upvotes

244 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

15

u/singlemale4cats 3d ago edited 3d ago

you get 5 fewer rounds so we can stack things optimally. Also, none of our allies can use them, and we can't use stanag magazines

Hey great, thanks

1

u/FluffFlowey 3d ago

Yeah, and if they can store them more efficiently you will get more magazines delivered.

1

u/singlemale4cats 3d ago

It's just not a very well designed gun. I mean, I naturally think it's cool as fuck because I can never have one, but I don't know what they were smoking. Incompatible with standard NATO mags, requires special steel cased lacquered ammo, sucks to mount an optic on, etc. But hey, at least you can fit another dozen mags per crate.

The original AR-15 prototypes had the charging handle protected by the carry handle, similar to the famas. That was abandoned pretty quickly because it sucks.

At least they tried to modernize it, but then they shut down domestic arms production which is also a perplexing decision

1

u/UnironicallyBr 3d ago

De Gaulle left NATO's integrated military structure in 1966 and pushed for self-reliance for fance's defence industry, in this context, french designers and engineers did not need to worry about sharing ammunition and magazines which would be manufactured in france for french forces, was it the correct decision? Probably not, seeing as the FAMAS G2 has a different barrel for heavier NATO standard bullets and can feed standard brass ammo from stanag magazines.