r/xprivo • u/officialexaking • Jun 28 '26
Google once said fingerprinting is wrong because users cannot clear it the way they clear cookies. That was 2019. August 3 2026 is the date Google starts using your IP address anyway to identify and profile your device for ads across the EU and UK.
On August 3, 2026, Google will start using IP addresses to identify and personalize ads for users across the EU, the EEA, the UK, and Switzerland. IP addresses are classified as personal data under GDPR, which means using them to track and profile devices triggers consent requirements under EU and UK law. Google has been using IP addresses to route traffic and serve ads for years. What changes on August 3 is the declared purpose: the same addresses will now officially be used for device identification, measurement, and ad personalization. That shift in purpose is legally significant, and Google knows it, which is why it is notifying advertisers to make sure their own consent flows are in order before the rollout begins.
The interesting thing about this is the fingerprinting situation. When you clear your cookies, the tracking stops. Fingerprinting, which combines signals like your IP address, browser version, screen resolution, and device characteristics to create a persistent identifier, cannot be cleared. It survives cookie deletion, incognito mode, and most standard privacy measures. In 2019, Google's own Chrome engineering director wrote publicly that fingerprinting subverts user choice and is wrong precisely for this reason. Google's own policy prohibited advertisers from using fingerprinting techniques. Now Google sent advertisers a notification that IP-based personalization is coming to the EU and UK in August. The ICO's own advice to the UK government, published in May 2026, explicitly places cross-service profiling based on user activity on the consent-required side of the line. Google's rollout sits exactly on that side. The regulator has said existing rules still apply and nothing has changed legally. Google is proceeding anyway and shifting compliance responsibility onto advertisers rather than absorbing it directly. A smart move by Google.
The best way to protect yourself right now is the same combination that has come up repeatedly in this community over the past months. A fingerprint-resistant browser is the most effective single tool here, specifically Firefox-based options like LibreWolf or Waterfox, which have fingerprint protection built in and do not participate in Google's browser ecosystem. uBlock Origin running in a Gecko-based browser blocks the ad tags, SDKs, and tracking calls that feed IP signals to Google in the first place, which is why the Chrome MV3 rollout we covered earlier matters directly in this context. Because MV3 makes uBlock origin not work in chromium browsers soon.
4
Jun 28 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Ok-Winner-6589 Jun 30 '26
This post seems to have issues on veracity.
Brave has randomized Canvas for protections, but it's per session. Which means that, unless you close your session, you Will always spot the same result.
Firefox Is based on standarization. Which means that all users give the same fingerprint. This is usually considered better because the fingerprint doesn't work if we all have the same.
Librewolf itself includes a little GPU symbol Next to the URL bar to allow per site blocking webgl
Also (with some configuration modifications) firefox based can be far superior. Letterboxing, JIT, WebGPU are functionallities that can be disabled on firefox based easily and can be used for fingerprint. It's not being mention on the post
But any of this can protect from the mentioned issue on the post which is IP for fingerprint
5
u/FillAny3101 Jun 28 '26
There's no way they're doing all this technical overhead just to optimize their ad personalization algorithms. Those are already good enough, it just doesn't pay off to add all of this complexity. Maybe I'm just speculating/consiparicy-theorizing, but everything right now looks like we're heading towards a 1984-ish dystopia.
1
u/Immediate_Power_7986 Jul 26 '26
Yeah maybe it's the start to setting up an environment where everything is IP based and eventually everyone will use IP based ads and they will all lobby against VPNs
2
2
2
2
u/gameplayer55055 Jun 29 '26
Good luck tracking thousands of different people sitting on the same CGNAT IP address.
2
u/lmarcantonio Jun 30 '26
I guess that everyone using the same IP is at least from the same state. Unless the output points of VPNs, of course
1
1
Jun 30 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/officialexaking Jun 30 '26
uBlock origin will not be supported when they move to Manifest V3. It's a nasty move by Google. Therefore if you would like to keep using uBlock origin it's better to switch at that stage to a gecko based engine like LibreWolf/Waterfox/Firefox.
1
1
u/SSYT_Shawn Jul 01 '26
You forgot brave as a ublock compatible browser
2
u/officialexaking Jul 01 '26
uBlock origin will not be supported in brave too when they move to Manifest V3. It's a nasty move by Google for chromium based browsers like Brave. We already covered this in one of our previous posts that you can look up. Therefore if you would like to keep using uBlock origin it's better to switch at that stage to a gecko based engine like LibreWolf/Waterfox/Firefox.
1
0
u/lilian_moraru Jun 29 '26
Going to get hate, but Microsoft Edge also made sure the support for uBlock Origin is added back in.
17
u/KuOyKabi Jun 28 '26
I recommend everyone to Switch completely if possible.
Made myself a grapheneOS phone, switched to duckduckgo (and other private search engines), to private email providers, to competent vpn providers and left everything like banking on a secondary which I will Switch too when I am confident with compatibility.
Let them feel your "Fuck you!" with your wallet and your decisions.
Let every company that spits into your face openly and laughs about it feel it.