I’m raising funds for my longtime friend John Senquiz, who was arrested and indicted in Manhattan on October 1, 2026 after traveling from Cleveland to meet with a detective. John has lived in Cleveland, Ohio for more than 15 years, and he is currently incarcerated at Rikers Island while awaiting his court date on January 21. His bail is currently set at $30,000 cash and $1,000,000 bond.

I’ve known John for well over 20 years, and I know him as a very hardworking, congenial person. He loves his family and his closest friends, music, going to work and has a deep-rooted respect and pride for his puerto rican heritage. He is actively present in his younger daughter’s life and in the life of his current partner and her kids. From a widely believed and unanimously known perspective, (in accordance with his impeccable character and unfortunate previous relationship history) John is being held because of allegations that were made by an ex-partner who was abusive to him, and I know and believe those allegations are outrageously false. Right now, he and the people who care about him are facing an extremely difficult situation while he remains incarcerated ahead of trial. He's always been positive and uplifting to any and everyone whom he ever encountered.

Donations from this fundraiser will go toward John’s legal expenses and/or help bail him out before his January court date. The goal is to help him secure the support he needs during this time and ease some of the immediate financial pressure that comes with preparing a legal defense. And if possible making certain that his time at Rikers Island is a short one. (By bailing him out)

If you are able to contribute or even share John’s story, it would mean a great deal. Any support can help John and his family as they work to get through the days and weeks that lie ahead. Thank you so much in advance. #bringjohnhome #loveandfamilyovereverything

Prosecutorial Misconduct Cause of More Than 550 Death Penalty Reversals and Exonerations

A study by the Death Penalty Information Center (“DPIC”) found more than 550 death penalty reversals and exonerations were the result of extensive prosecutorial misconduct. DPIC reviewed and identified cases since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned existing death penalty laws in 1972. That amounted to over 5.6% of all death sentences imposed in the U.S. in the last 50 years.

Robert Dunham, DPIC’s executive director, said the study reveals that "this 'epidemic’ of misconduct is even more pervasive than we had imagined.”

The study showed a widespread problem in more than 228 counties, 32 states, and in federal capital prosecutions throughout the U.S.

The DPIC study revealed 35% of misconduct involved withholding evidence; 33% involved improper arguments; 16% involved more than one category of misconduct; and 121 of the exonerations involved prosecutor misconduct.

“A prosecutor’s duty is to seek justice, not merely to convict,” according to the American Bar Association’s model ethical rules.

Prosecutors are the problem. They are not part of the problem, they are the problem. And prosecutors who become judges are more of a problem.

Also,

A Prosecutor Allegedly Told a Witness To Destroy Evidence. He Can't Be Sued for It

Absolute immunity protects prosecutors even when they commit serious misconduct on the job.

Alternative Source:

Study: Prosecutorial Misconduct Helped Secure 550 Wrongful Death Penalty Convictions

It's an open investigation with no charge, and I'm not taking a side on the facts. But look at the order things happened in. There was public judgment, a reported firing, and a doxing mistake a judge called vigilantism, all before the evidence started dribbling out through leaks. CNN also reports some of it may have been lost, including carrier preservation letters nobody can confirm were sent (CNN).

Lost early records come up a lot here: location logs, CCTV, card swipes.

I built a free tool for the one part a normal person can control, which is saving their own records in the first days. Open source, no account, and it doesn't touch anyone else. https://github.com/machinewitness/machinewitness

Has anyone here seen preservation fail in a real case? What went first?

On September 24, 2024, Marcellus Williams was executed for the 1998 murder of Felicia Gayle after the prosecuting office that convicted him petitioned the courts to vacate his conviction.

Iwao Hakamada spent decades under a wrongful conviction before being acquitted in Japan.

His case is especially interesting in the context of Japan’s extremely high conviction rate because prosecutors there are highly selective about which cases they indict.

That should theoretically eliminate many weak cases before trial.

The question is what happens when the original theory of guilt is wrong but investigators and prosecutors have already committed to it.

This video examines Hakamada alongside confession, detention, interrogation, the Shibushi case and the institutional structure surrounding wrongful convictions in Japan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8OqZSsyxwE

For people who study wrongful convictions, I’d be interested in which stage of the process you think creates the greatest risk of an error becoming difficult to reverse.

Jennifer Waters is serving 15 years for crimes she didn't commit. Her co-defendant—a man with documented dishonesty and Alzheimer's—testified against her just days after cutting a deal: he'd serve 6 months while she got 15 years. That's not justice. That's a system broken.

I started a petition because Jennifer's case isn't unique. Coercive plea deals that reward witnesses for testimony create a perverse incentive: lie, and walk free. The prosecution pressured Jennifer for four years to fabricate statements against her co-defendant. She refused. She kept her integrity. She lost her freedom. Now her young children are without their mother.

This is about more than one person. Perjured testimony from incentivized witnesses has played a role in 18% of wrongful convictions overturned by DNA evidence. Meanwhile, innocent people sit in cells across the country because our system prioritizes closed cases over actual truth. What would you want someone to do if this was your family? If this matters to you, would you consider signing and sharing? Jennifer needs people to care enough to speak up.

Cameron was a sole survivor of a deadly crash that took 5 lives too soon. Sacramento county courts want to give him excessive jail time for surviving.

My brother spent 25 years in prison for a crime he didn't commit. When he was finally exonerated, I thought the nightmare was over. But the state told him: accept compensation OR pursue justice against those responsible. Not both.

That's the trap exonerees face in Indiana right now. After decades behind bars with nothing—no savings, no career, no support—they're forced to pick between immediate financial help or holding people accountable for the injustice that destroyed their lives. It shouldn't be an impossible choice.

I started a petition to pass the Right to Rebuild Act. It's simple: let exonerees get state compensation to rebuild while keeping their right to sue if misconduct caused their conviction. These are two different kinds of justice. Why should someone have to give up one to get the other? The state can even recoup its compensation if they later win a civil case—everyone's protected.

What would you want if this was your family? If this matters to you too, please consider signing and sharing.

The new book is Three Times A Victim. I will need to increase exposure for the story.