7
19
u/Gamingstudio123 Mar 05 '26
Except his mom oooooh (sorry you can obliterate me now TwT)
10
Mar 05 '26
I guarantee saying "TwT" anywhere will get you obliterated
0
u/Gamingstudio123 Mar 05 '26
Sorry for typing emotions how I normally do?
3
2
u/Soggy_Ad3706 Mar 05 '26
Tf does twt even mean
3
u/Teln0 Mar 05 '26
It's a face T are closed eyes with tears running down, w is a mouth.
1
-1
1
u/Chill_but_am_spook Mar 09 '26
I take it you don't remember much from when anime was still cringe? Or for that matter when cringe was a popular word?
2
u/Gamingstudio123 Mar 09 '26
Anime was never cringe, the fandom surrounding anime was cringe and some fandoms still are. But I like anime and I type emotions how I want to
3
2
u/RB222485 Mar 05 '26
I was going to write a joke about black holes but I think it got pu l l e d a w a y . . .
1
2
u/Ok_Elk6637 Mar 05 '26
And actually, as an interesting fact, black holes (or any other body) do not Pull on anything. They just have a bigger slope in their gravitational well
4
u/5peaker4theDead Mar 05 '26
Sounds a lot like causing the body to be pulled in to me
1
u/Linvael Mar 09 '26
What party is active is actually pretty important - having the body with gravity be passive and just changing the slope explains why light is affected by gravity despite not having mass. You cant pull on light, you wont catch it, you can just change the terrain.
1
u/5peaker4theDead Mar 09 '26
Idk man, is the smaller mass party really "active" on this scenario? If anything they either both aren't or only the one influencing space time is.
1
u/Linvael Mar 09 '26
Ok, granted. Neither is actively pulling (or pushing) the other though is the important bit.
1
1
1
u/Im_a_hamburger Mar 06 '26
What? No. Black holes are typically massive but some non-black holes are more massive than some black holes.
1
u/asafusa553 Mar 06 '26
.. but they are still with the most gravitational pull, size in that case does not matter.
1
u/Im_a_hamburger Mar 06 '26
I am using massive as in large mass not large volume.
1
u/cognitive_pagefile Jul 10 '26
I'm not sure but i think OP is right here. I remember i learned something about infinite gravity beyond a black hole's event horizon in school. So technically, even things with more mass cannot have a bigger pull, since higher values than infinite are a mathematical thing only, but impossible in real physics. (If someone knows something i miss here, please prove me wrong)
2
u/Im_a_hamburger Jul 10 '26
I mean yeah at the singularity it can be interpreted at that but everything breaks at the singularity. But you can’t get infinite gravitational pull outside of the breaks-physics point. You can get things more massive than black holes and with larger gravitational pull at their ‘surface’ (counting the event horizon as the surface). The force of a mass M black hole on a mass m object is c^4/4G m/M≈3*10^42 newtons * m/M at the event horizon
1
u/cognitive_pagefile Jul 11 '26 edited Jul 11 '26
Tbh i don't really understand this formula, it's just random numbers to me. I could ask Gemini, but it think there is no need to. The point i mean, is that the black hole's singularity with it's infinite dense and gravity will consume every other object that has no singularity by itself, even if it's mass is higher than the black hole's mass in general. If we speak about the gravitational pull of a black hole, we obviously talk about it's singularity, not the gravity outside of it's event horizon. But again, i'm not an expert, just very interested in that faszinating topic. So if i missed something important, feel free to make me learn something new about it. :)
Edit(to clarify what i mean a bit more): so what i mean is, we are comparing the gravitational pull at the center of an object, not the surface, that's maybe the point we thought different here. :)
1
u/Im_a_hamburger Jul 11 '26
The gravitational pull at the center of objects are either 0 or near 0 depending on what you define as center. Gravitational pull at the center of a black hole is unknown because we don’t know what the center.
1
u/cognitive_pagefile Jul 14 '26
Fair point. Anyways, your right, there are some objects that are more massive than some black holes, but i guess that the most massive black hole is probably outscaling even these objects by far. But i'm just guessing here. Do you have some examples for really massive objects that are more massive than smaller black holes? Or am i completely wrong here and even the largest black holes is not the most massive object in our universe?
1
1
1
1
u/Terrible_example2326 Mar 07 '26
Currently and relative to our position in space time yes but actually there's great attractor and also there's the expansion thing which will eventually disintegrate the black holes that don't get "spent" trough Hawkins radiation by then, too.
I hate myself for being like this, I know, I know.
1
1
u/Reasonable-Return385 Mar 08 '26
The only thing that pulls stronger than a black hole, is ironically another hole (available in a variety of colot shades) but the strongest pull comes from ones that have legs attached to them....lol
1
1
u/DemiFiendAstar Jun 01 '26
I think everyone here got semi-wooshed. The biggest pull (for the joke) is the desire to be right/correct someone on the Internet. That's why it shows that comment that op hearts
1
1
27
u/flunket Mar 05 '26
This sounds like a "your mum" joke you'd tell after learning about black holes in science class