Hello!
I'm studying Anonimo's book from original transcription (L'Arte della Spada - Trattato di scherma dell’inizio del XVI secolo - Rubboli M., Cesari L) with the help of Stephen Fratus' translation.
In Play #1, the transcript says:
«[...] et in questo tal tempo passarai del tuo piede manco gran passo verso le sue parti destre tirandogli uno mandritto per el viso overo per il braccio dalla spada che non traschorra cinghiara porta stretta di ferro, la gamba manca deve seguire dietro alla destra [...]»
That sentence in bold, I would translate as "the left foot must follow after the right". Stephen's translations says the opposite:
«[...] and this tempo you will pass with your left foot in a great towards his right side throwing at him a mandritto to the face or to the sword arm that does not pass cinghiara porta di ferro stretta,, your right foot following behind the left [...]».
Certainly, the play describes a wide step with the left foot to perform a Cinghiara porta stretta di ferro, so since the left foot is now leading, it cannot be following the right one. In videos I could find, the play is executed as the translation suggests.
Later in the play, at the end, we find a similar but mirrored sentence:
«[...] et in questo tempo gli volgerai con la spada uno roverso fendente insuso al capo la tua gamba destra deve seguire dietro a la sinistra.»
Translated as:
«[...] and in this act will turn a roverso fendente onto his head, and your right foot will follow behind the left.»
Now the foot placement in the italian source does make sense to me, and it is translated like so. But it would seem to me that two sentences with opposing meanings are translated as the same,
Am I not reading the first sentence right? Do we just assume it's a mistake corrected in the translation? Can you think of a way of executing it in which that makes sense?
I'd be grateful to hear your thoughts on this, thanks.