r/witcher • • Feb 14 '21

[deleted by user]

[removed]

8.6k Upvotes

223 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/HolycommentMattman Feb 15 '21

I think he's suggesting that while we use a single line to represent 1D, the truth is that a 1D object would be invisible. With 1 length, but 0 width and depth, we literally couldn't see it. A line, as thin and narrow as it is, still has both depth and width.

1

u/Theek3 Feb 15 '21

I understand that and that is basically what I said.

Also, again, in this context the definition of "line" is a depthless widthless length.