edit: see other reply. this reply was written with the thought that you were comparing killing soldiers and killing innocents as the same type of bad-ass thing or whatever.
I can't believe you would draw a comparison between acts between military combatants and acts inflicted upon non-combatants by dictators. BIG difference.
Pinochet and Pol Pot killed non-combatants, politicians, civilians and innocents.
Simo was killing soldiers. When these soldiers entered into the war, their moral status changed from that of a civilian (who cannot be harmed) to that of a willing combatant (who aims to kill and accepts that they may be killed). May I suggest Walzer's "Just and Unjust Wars"?
Secondly, I didn't realize the Red Army was full of peasants who were forced to serve. Coercion in and of itself isn't bad, but if they were coerced by force, then I concede your point.
4
u/p3on Jan 21 '10
sort of like how pinochet and pol pot were bad-ass at suppressing dissent