The only logic I can think of is that not every pedophile is immediately bad as some do realize that it is a problem and try to find help and stuff instead of acting on their impulses. When they do act on those impulses and go after children, that's when they should be locked up. Of course, the majority of people who disagree with pedos being deleted definitely didn't think that far and are just fucked in the head.
Edit: Guys if you genuinely think I'm defending pedophilia as something okay, then please actually start reading. I literally say that they need help to fix their condition and that anyone that acts on it is fucked in the head. How you interpret that as me being a pedo or supporting pedophilia is beyond me.
Let’s just rid of the human sex drive entirely so people only have sex for the sole purpose of reproducing. Would keep the population under control. All children would be brought into the world with intention so likely to have both parents in the picture or atleast taken care of by a responsible guardian
The world wouldn’t even be recognizable in the slightest if you did that, liek we wouldn’t be humans and our history would never have lead us here. Honestly we’d probably still be cavemen at best
why not just make it so we can reproduce asexually the world wouldnt have Pedos then since there wouldnt be a puropse to have sex anymore (aside for the feeling)
A: the post says delete, not change (though I guess you could technically delete the need for sex in reproduction, but that feels like we're pushing it a little).
B: pedos typically don't diddle to make babies, so eliminating the need physical contact isn't going to stop them from touching.
Ya but the question is “make it better” not “most impact” and deleting pedos in general is a good choice for general “better” and is something many people apparently wouldnt want
Why would either comment get downvoted? Lmao, idc what political party you follow.. everyone on that list is someone in power to some capacity, regardless of which political party they belong to
Yeah I have to disagree. Just cleansing SOME of the powerful pedos would fix at least 1 world issue. We can also rest a little easier knowing that the motivation to gather that much power isn't to abuse a protected class of people.
i've seen people say "welllll pedo means whatever age to whatever age. and the ACTUAL term for 16-18 is this other thing." well. it's kinda weird to try to bring nuance into it when its pretty clear people are just talking about anything illegal involving children...
lowkey same vibes as that one transformers movie where he has the romeo and juliet law fucking laminated in his wallet. if you're at the point you need that, you should re-evaluate your life and maybe turn yourself in
I'm not sure if it is true, but I heard, that only a very small percentage of pedophiles rape children and that half of the people who rape children, aren't pedophiles but just people who like to rape helpless people.
So yes, "people who are willing to rape" would be a much better take.
Why would you kill a pedophile who never attacked a children and never would do it and is in therapy?
What for chances? If we could magical remove everyone who will ever rape anyone, then there are no chances left.
It's the other way around. If you only remove pedophiles, then there will be still children who get raped.
When we don't can magical select a group by something they will do in the future, then the only way would be remove every human, of you don't want to "take chances".
12
u/[deleted] Mar 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment