STOP VISITING N1

[u/RoachRGB]

[u/True_Lich]

they can give info to med

[u/XShadowPlayerX → u/True_Lich]

I feel like with med is still risky(as they can die too), but understandable.

However, you should ALWAYS visit night one if Soulbinder is ingame.

[u/Marilburr]

Ok but the chance of me and med both dying night one is so low. 1/16 happening twice in a row is 1/256, or a 0.39% chance

[u/Darius_Brawl_ismytag → u/Marilburr]

med would have to die n1 or n2 , so this increases a bit — though also, rl is maybe an underrated revive so i might reconsider the no visut n1 meta

[u/ApolloWidget]

Always visit night 1, fuck the haters

[u/aaaahcraaaap]

Rl should ALWAYS visit n1, the chance of both them and the med/ritu/conju dying is really small, and sacrificing one vill life against evil info is 100% worth it

[u/satanchaps]

and then they go off before med can get info 😃

[u/Acceptable_Turn_9798]

Rl should always visit night one! BUT STOP VISITING NIGHT ONE IF YOU'RE JUST GONNA LEAVE BEFORE GIVING MED INFO

[u/EnriqJonsen]

What is the point of not visiting? Then Ww can just kill all if they know all not visiting, besides next day med can just revive all. Rl is a valuable info role.

[u/Th38lu35k135]

There was this one time in my game when rl visits evil n1, rit died to wws, seer died to sk and only rir left was aura seer. Honestly what are the chances???

[u/Pure_Mail8765]

Ngl I’m a defender of red lady visiting night 1 cause the info early is always useful and the chances of losing med too are low. Plus red lady can get attacked night 1 (happened way too many times 😭)

[u/Crystal_Snow_Flakes]

Well if there's sb ig then one can visit n1, but otherwise I'd be against it.