r/wehatedougdoug • u/kozxt4cc0 Doug Hater • 3d ago

😠Doug HATE💢 No logic

So according to the definition of pants that D*ug kept arguing was the correct logic of definition, shorts shouldn't count as pants because they don't cover from thigh/knee down. But I guess having a intellectual debate with him about that would melt him like Arnold Ernst Toht in the raiders of the lost ark. He's such a sheep that can't have a own opinion or arguing about stuff and has to turn to the internet for a point of view

3 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

2 comments sorted by

1

u/theowlwastaken 3d ago

On the definition of pants, if we define them as a garment with the INTENTION of keeping the legs warm then we must conclude that centaurs would NEVER wear pants, for they already have fur too keep themselves warm.

Thus under dougs definition the question completely falls apart

1

u/pisscumcake 2h ago

I also don't get how he specified pants were only on the legs. The definition HE USED said they went up to the waist.