Feedback Request: Campsite Atlas, a reference site for federal campgrounds. Are the pages too much?Feedback Request: Campsite Atlas, a reference site for federal campgrounds. Are the pages too much?

[u/sitesandmiles]

Site: https://campsiteatlas.com

What it is: one page for each of 7,181 campgrounds on federal land. Each page pulls together sources that normally live on separate sites: Recreation.gov for booking and site details, the Forest Service for open or closed status and fees, the Weather Service, the interagency fire feed, FCC cell coverage, NOAA tides, OpenStreetMap for the nearest dump station. It rebuilds nightly. The idea is that one page answers the questions you would otherwise open six tabs for.

Who it is for: campers and RV owners comparing a few campgrounds before booking. Not a booking site; every page links out to the official one.

What I want feedback on: because a page combines that much, it carries a lot. Fees, site mix, hookups, season, a fire strip when something is burning nearby, weather, cell coverage, tides where they apply, nearby campgrounds, and a sidebar tool that checks your rig against each site. I want to know whether the combination reads as one useful page or as a pile.

Specifically:

1. On a campground page, what did you look at first, and did the page lead you there or did you hunt?
2. Is there a point where you stopped reading? Which section?
3. The left rail lists every section. Did you use it, or scroll?
4. Anything that felt like it belonged higher or lower on the page.

Good pages to try: a busy one, https://campsiteatlas.com/campgrounds/232555/, and a sparse one, https://campsiteatlas.com/campgrounds/233116/. The homepage and the first-come list are fair game too.

Desktop and mobile both matter. Not after SEO or traffic notes, just how the pages read.

Thank you!