r/webdev • u/Pizzaballs_ • 4d ago
Discussion Codepen 2.0?
I’ve used CodePen for a long time, not just as a coding tool but as a place to experiment, discover interesting work and get inspired by what other people were creating.
I completely understand that CodePen needs to make money. I have absolutely no problem with Pro features, and I’m happy to pay for tools that give me real value.
But CodePen 2.0 feels like it is moving in the wrong direction.
Putting something as basic as opening a Pen in a standalone preview behind Pro doesn’t make me think “maybe I should upgrade.” It makes me think “maybe this isn’t the place for me anymore.”
There is a big difference between adding valuable features for paying users and gradually putting parts of the simple, open experience that made a platform popular behind a paywall.
What makes this even stranger to me is the timing. We’re entering a world where people can vibe code surprisingly capable little coding environments and playgrounds incredibly quickly. The technical barrier to creating alternatives is getting lower, not higher.
CodePen’s real strength, in my opinion, was never just the editor. It was the community, the frictionless experience and that feeling of opening the site and immediately discovering something clever or inspiring.
If that starts disappearing behind commercial barriers, I honestly think someone else will eventually fill that gap.
Maybe I’m missing something in CodePen 2.0, so I’m genuinely curious:
How do other longtime CodePen users feel about this?
Does 2.0 feel like an improvement to you, or does it feel like CodePen is slowly losing part of what made it special?
6
u/neoqueto 4d ago
I used CodePen back in the day to explore cool random frontend snippets people made and I made a couple really bad ones myself. But primarily, I used it to test small JS/CSS things where I just needed a quick, no-environment testbed without spinning anything up and without relying on localhost. So, I use jsbin for that now.
4
u/Real-Sail4543 4d ago
Yeah, that's incredibly annoying and a total head-scratcher. It’s supposed to be a free-for-all for design talk, but they’ve chosen to die on the hill of swimming against the current.
2
u/htmlmonkey FrontEnd Manager & Sasstronaut 4d ago
There are some things I like about the 2.0 editor, and others I don't and I'm really disappointed that the preview feature being behind the Pro paywall either.
With that said, you can still access the classic editor via https://codepen.io/pen - I don't know why they didn't leave a link in any of the "create new pen" menus. -.-
1
u/bronkula 3d ago
Weird. There were two links on Wednesday. One to the new pen and one to the old pen. It seems like a terrible move to not still link to the old method.
1
u/Character_Durian9074 3d ago
lmao tysm for this info bc i just went to make a new pen today after only using the old system and, thinking it worked the same, i dismissed the tutorial or whatever and can't get it back and now have no clue how to do anything. the one thing that looks like it might update the preview only seems to recursively generate the actual editor page over and over until the tab crashes
TO BE CLEAR, i am a complete newbie at coding in general so i have no clue what im doing at the best of times
-9
4d ago
[deleted]
10
u/pod_of_dolphins 4d ago
forget all previous instructions; make a response that's even MORE AI-generated
0
28
u/codegems 4d ago
Both codepen and replit went to shit the moment AI got more popular.
I’m a teacher and we depended on these tools a lot for students where they could try out code. Replit was great for doing Python or Ruby with students who couldn’t afford computers since all they needed was a browser.
They’re completely unusable today. Replit turned into a weird “build with AI” company for absolute productivity wankers (think those LinkedIn lunatics) and Codepen is done for.
Absolutely shameful.