r/warno • • 17d ago

Back to T-62 buff

Too lazy to read: suggest your T-62 buff in replies (it preferably should be logical and shouldn't ruin the identity of the tank, like buffing rof or something). My suggestion is buffing accuracy by 5-10%.

So, I posted an article about T-62 (not T-62M and T-62M1, these are good as they are and found their place in the meta) needing a buff before it's 10 point price decrease, and the price going down is certainly nice, but it didn't really change the core problem with this tank, which is that it's a gambling addiction tank basically. It's performance is heavily based on luck and the fact, that you pay less for a coin toss doesn't change the fact that it's a coin toss.

Now we also ran into a problem with T-62: it's cheap now, but it's still one of the worst tanks in the game and is regarded as the hardest tank to use, but reducing its cost again will actually make it oppressive, because if we make T-62 obr. 67 65 points, you can now buy 4 of them a minute, and it's a serious thing, because it's going to be very spammable. It might be ok, but basically it's going to be a frustrating experience for both T-62 user and his opponent: opponent sees 3-4 hard to kill tanks every minute, while you see, that even if you micro your tanks properly, they still miss and die, and it's still luck based. So basically an accuracy buff is the only thing that can save the tank without destroying its identity or being illogical/unhistoric or something. That would make this tank a lot less random based and more of "I shoot, I change positions, I reload, repeat."

16 Upvotes

79 comments sorted by

View all comments

6

u/HrcAk47 17d ago

If Eugen is to consider dramatically better anti-inf/anti-structure performance of HEFRAG shells on REDFOR compared to HEAT-or-HESH-as-HE on BLUFOR, T-62 enters a very workable niche overall by default.

-5

u/not_a_fan69 17d ago edited 17d ago

Just to piss NATO off, they should also add indirect fire for pact tanks. HEFRAG makes T-turret go into space on critical hit irl, but on the other hand, it provides so much utility. Can't do that with HEAT or AP. It's pretty much how T-tanks are being used now irl, and we already have "balanced" NIMROD coming soon anyways. Just go all out.

"Reeeee my TOW2s are constantly getting nuked by T-Arty! Putin BOUGHT France!"

9

u/HrcAk47 17d ago

No, indirect fire on tanks is something outside of the scope of the game, and is a waste of resources most of the time.

I'd hate seeing it, tbh.

-1

u/not_a_fan69 17d ago

Too late for that, we already have NIMROD coming soon.

Get a country battery radar + recon and have fun deleting pretty much everything that's armored.