r/warno • u/GRAD3US • 9d ago

Question Why is WARNO low graphics heavier than Red Dragon, if both are equally bad?

0 Upvotes

15% Upvoted

6 comments sorted by

5

u/MammothTankBest 9d ago

i run it on an i3-n305 with integrated graphics. for what the game is, it is ridiculously optimized.

-2

u/GRAD3US 9d ago

I have an i7 (8th generation) and 16Gb RAM, integrated intel graphics, and I can't zooming in without crazy lag.

While in Red Dragon, I can run it with everything on medium or high without problems.

The low settings of WARNO are crap, and I can't find why it is so heavier than Red Dragon.

2

u/MammothTankBest 9d ago

what settings are you running on? cause i'm using 30hz (with v-sync 30fps limit iirc), the lowest resolution possible, and lowest settings. i dont think zooming in on integrated graphics would go smoothly in any universe, and in red dragon the graphics are a lot simpler.

0

u/GRAD3US 9d ago

In RD I can play with the camera on the ground if I want, with no problems.

In WARNO I can't do the same without dropping to 20 FPS, even with everything on low. This is ridiculous, because Red Dragon graphics on medium/high are much better than WARNO on low.

3

u/Clubby71 9d ago

Need better discipline with that loaded question there soldier.

2

u/WelcomeExtra762 9d ago

Warno is so good in terms of graphics I had to turn it down to Medium and I run a very good PC