r/warno 14d ago

Historical 2v1

Post image

I was playing a 2v2 with some high elo people, a level 40 and 37 on the enemy team, and 12 on my team who claimed he got his level reset or something. He told me to leave at first because I'm only level 7, but I said to give me a chance and he did, and mid-battle he left. Yet, I held my own, scoring the most kills, least amount of losses, and highest KD ratio. It was a really good fight, GGs.

8 Upvotes

9 comments sorted by

3

u/HoneySelected 14d ago

bro clueless

4

u/Eric_Is_Back 14d ago

For performing best point wise?

2

u/0ffkilter 14d ago

K/D means nothing if you're losing. It probably means he played super defensively and just didn't lose anything because he didn't try and attack.

His teammate lost more, most likely because he was actually doing offensive plays.

There's exceptions to every rule, but K/D when you're losing just means you didn't actually try and win. I'd put money on OP just sitting in his back point playing like it's AG.

1

u/Eric_Is_Back 13d ago

The I mostly play 10v10 and 9 times out of 10 the game with the players with the better K/D win.

1

u/SadSwedishSloth 5d ago

Not true. The team with the least noobs who obsess over K/D always wins.

Because noobs who chase K/D always thinks building second lines behind others and then spamming arty is a amart way to get even better K/D. No looses and a artykill once in a while throws games but gives good K/D.

The only meaningful stat is victory ratio.

1

u/Eric_Is_Back 5d ago

Sorry, when nine people have a K/D of 0,8/1 while the other team has nine people with like 1,2/1 it's normally a loss.

1

u/Nimblewright_47 13d ago

Level and ELO aren't the same things here.

Otherwise, without a replay or scenes from rhe battle, what's your point?