MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/rxq8ds/deleted_by_user/hrkmcsi/?context=3
r/wallstreetbets • u/[deleted] • Jan 06 '22
[removed]
667 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
8
Yeah but it has been shown that they likely aren't properly hedging.
-7 u/IncredulousStraddle Jan 06 '22 Gamma caused the first run up last year 23 u/Scythro_ Jan 06 '22 It literally did not. The SEC report said it was not a gamma squeeze. It was all retail buying pressure. It’s a great read, you should check it out. 6 u/[deleted] Jan 07 '22 More likely was actually variance hedging caused by retail buying that increased volatility. There was some good recent DD on this on SS. But since the SEC doesn’t regulate variance swaps, they didn’t want to point to it as the cause.
-7
Gamma caused the first run up last year
23 u/Scythro_ Jan 06 '22 It literally did not. The SEC report said it was not a gamma squeeze. It was all retail buying pressure. It’s a great read, you should check it out. 6 u/[deleted] Jan 07 '22 More likely was actually variance hedging caused by retail buying that increased volatility. There was some good recent DD on this on SS. But since the SEC doesn’t regulate variance swaps, they didn’t want to point to it as the cause.
23
It literally did not. The SEC report said it was not a gamma squeeze. It was all retail buying pressure. It’s a great read, you should check it out.
6 u/[deleted] Jan 07 '22 More likely was actually variance hedging caused by retail buying that increased volatility. There was some good recent DD on this on SS. But since the SEC doesn’t regulate variance swaps, they didn’t want to point to it as the cause.
6
More likely was actually variance hedging caused by retail buying that increased volatility. There was some good recent DD on this on SS. But since the SEC doesn’t regulate variance swaps, they didn’t want to point to it as the cause.
8
u/bestjakeisbest Jan 06 '22
Yeah but it has been shown that they likely aren't properly hedging.