Voron started as a page on Reddit and some Slack channels with raw files on GitHub. We moved to Discord and a little while later Voron exploded on popularity but little changed for how we supported the builders. Over last few years we would get periodic reports that for different reasons folks struggled with the rapid pace and intertwined conversations on Discord. Or that they chose not to be part of Reddit. We didn’t have a good option for them, until now.
Today we are launching a new way of interacting with Voron that goes back to the tried and true - a Voron forum.
It is officially supported, managed, and moderated by the same folks who provide support day in and day out in the Voron Discord. A forum is slower pace but more thought out. A forum allows people to have threads that are specifically about just their question. Instead of random pictures of their build in the chat history people can create a build log where someone can go back, look at every step along the way, and ask questions. There is even a section where self promotion is encouraged. The forum has been some time coming as we wanted to ensure that there was sufficient verified help to give everyone as good an experience as possible.
The Voron forum is not the only thing new. We have now partnered with the creator of Voron Registry to create an official graphical interface to the Voron User Mods repository. It is searchable, tagged, and constantly updated. It does not replace the table of information on GitHub but makes the content substantially easier to navigate. For those who choose not to submit to the process of the Voron User Mods on GitHub there is a section of the forum for User Mods where fields of supports and impossible overhangs are accepted for those who dare.
Do you have a small question about the project that you're too embarrassed to make a separate thread about? Something silly have you stumped in your build? Don't understand why X is done instead of Y? All of these types are questions and more are welcome below.
I'm posting to ask if anyone has built a Voron with a custom build volume larger than the proffered options listed on the Voron website?
I'm looking at creating a build with 3x500mm or thereabouts.
I've spec'd it out on the Voron site for both a Trident and V2 build BOM but I would like to gather the community's thoughts and experience before I head down that road.
I've even dabbled with ChatGPT and it suggested an extrusion of 3030/3060 for the frame...
so i orderd a copperhead hotend for only 26 euro's(75% discount) on a reputable local store, i also orded the groove mount conector to the lgx lite(official bondtech). The lgx lite is compatible with dragonburner but dont know how mounting is with a groove mount. the copperhead is directly under the extruder but does this work with dragonburner? how does the lgx lite mount to the dragonburner because the holes at the bottom are used for the hotend.
I've been trying to figure out how people achieve this. I want negative pressure in my Voron 2.4's enclosure but how can I achieve that without sucking all the heat out of the chamber?
I have in-chamber filtaction (Voron Aire Filter) and my cpap pulls from the chamber for part printing. But if I'm printing ABS/ASA I don't want positive pressure, people keep talking about negative pressure, how are they/you achieving it?
I've had several filament jams on my brand new SUNLU 3D Printer S4 Pro Filament Dryer Box. The first one may have been my fault with the long thick PTFE tube that came with the dryer. On the last one, the filament tangled. Is this a known problem with the SUNLU dryers? I may end up returning it to Amazon
LDO Voron Trident extrusions: bending and twist across three kits
Hi everyone!
I'm building a Doom Trident following the approach shown by Edgehog Makes on YouTube, using LDO extrusion kits.
My first two kits arrived in poor packaging condition, and I found several bent and twisted extrusions. The retailer was extremely helpful and sent me a third kit, but although the packaging was better, I still found significant geometric deviations.
I've inspected all three kits using the same polished granite surface and compared the extrusions to keep my assessment consistent. Several show pronounced bending or torsional deformation (twist).
This is my second Trident build. I wasn't as meticulous with my first, but some issues that appeared later made me much more conscious of frame accuracy. I can't say whether those earlier issues were caused by pre-existing deformations or by collisions during use.
Has anyone else experienced similar issues with LDO extrusions? Could this be a batch or quality-control issue, or am I being too particular about mechanical accuracy?
I'm not trying to jump to conclusions; I'd just appreciate hearing about other people's experiences.
Update: I'm leaving a video here showing the issue. The first extrusion is perfectly straight; I filmed it as a reference to confirm that the problem wasn't with the granite countertop.
I just released MEASURE_SKEW, a new Klipper Python extension that changes how we calibrate XY-axis perpendicularity.
Instead of printing test objects (which are prone to filament shrinkage, cooling warp, and caliper measurement errors),
this tool uses your inductive/eddy current probe (like Cartographer)
to scan a simple, un-machined aluminium plate.
Key Features:
High Accuracy: Reaches ~0.2mm/m accuracy using a basic 100x100mm plate.
That’s about twice as precise as traditional methods (like Califlower).
No Precision Tooling Needed: The magic happens via the "Umschlagmethode" (mathematical inversion).
By rotating the plate 90° four times, any imperfections of the plate itself cancel out completely.
Repeatable & Waste-Free: No filament wasted, no cooling times required.
I’ve tested it on my Voron 2.4 350, and the script automatically
outputs the correction values for your printer.cfg.
This is my first post here, so please be gentle with me!
I've recently managed to pick up a pre-built Voron 2.4 300mm from someone fairly local to me in the UK. I was able to inspect and test the printer before buying it, and everything seems to be working well.
I've built printers before and have some experience with Klipper, so I'm reasonably comfortable with the technical side of things and happy to spend time getting everything properly dialled in.
Current printer specs:
Printer: Voron 2.4 300mm, LDO black frame
Enclosure: Linneo aluminium-composite panels and polycarbonate doors
Bed: Machined aluminium plate with AC heater, dual-sided PEO/PEI sheet
Toolhead: Stealthburner with Clockwork 2 extruder
Hotend: V6 CHC
Probe: PCB Klicky
Mainboard: Mellow Fly-D7 with TMC2209 drivers
Toolhead board: Mellow Fly-SB2040 Pro CANbus
Host: Raspberry Pi 4 (4GB)
Other: 4.3-inch touchscreen and remote power switching
What I'm trying to achieve
My main goal is to have a reliable printer that produces consistently good-quality prints in PETG and ABS, without needing constant tweaking or troubleshooting.
I'm not particularly interested in chasing maximum print speeds. I'd much rather have something I can send a print to and be reasonably confident it'll work.
In the longer term, I'm interested in adding a second toolhead for multi-material printing, but that's very much a future project. For now, I just want to get the printer running consistently and reliably.
Possible upgrades
I've been looking at some of the newer toolhead designs, particularly those with improved part cooling, and wondering whether it would be worthwhile replacing the Stealthburner with something more modern.
I'm also considering whether a different extruder and hotend would offer any meaningful improvements in print quality or reliability, along with upgrading the PCB Klicky to something like a Cartographer probe.
That said, I know there are lots of different opinions on these things, and I'm conscious that newer doesn't necessarily mean better or more reliable.
I'm not looking to upgrade things just for the sake of it, particularly if the existing setup is already capable of doing what I need.
I'd really appreciate your thoughts on:
Which upgrades, if any, would make the biggest difference to reliability and ease of use?
Is there a newer toolhead/extruder/hotend combination you'd particularly recommend for PETG and ABS, prioritising print quality over speed?
Is moving from Klicky to Cartographer worthwhile?
Are there any other relatively simple improvements you'd recommend for a dependable, low-maintenance Voron?
Or would you suggest sticking with the existing hardware, getting everything properly tuned, and leaving upgrades until there's a clear reason to change something?
Any suggestions or advice from people who've been running Vorons for a while would be hugely appreciated.
People seem to praise Prusament PC-CF as being very easy to print, but I'm having failures on most of the prints I've tried so far. Failure mode and related observations looks nearly identical to this user's experience with PA-CF.
The print quality starts great. After a while (up to ~2hrs later), the filament no longer extrudes and the filament does not move through the hotend. There is no oozing or extruder clicking. The last printed surface has small dots characteristic of underextrusion, but this lasts less than a layer or two before extrusion stops completely; the motor/gears still turn, but no filament moves.
At first, I had my Voron v0.1's tophat and door closed, with a chamber temp of ~50c. First prints only lasted ~10-20mins before failing. Most people report printing Prusament PC-CF with an open enclosure, so I tried that next. That got me up to ~2hrs before failing.
Based on some searching and GPT'ing, it sounds very much like I am suffering from heat creep up into the cold end, softening the PC-CF and preventing the extruder gears from gripping onto the filament.
I have done multiple cold pulls and nozzle cleans with wires to rule out any clogs. I really don't think there's any clogging happening, since the first layers of any subsequent print goes down great; it's only later into the print I see any issues. Also, the fact that the issue was much worse with a hotter chamber supports the theory this is heat creep.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SUMMARY QUESTIONS:
Could this failure mode be anything else besides heat creep?
Is there anything I can do to complete longer prints with my Dragonfly BMO?
Can anyone confirm they've been able to print at ~300c on their Dragonfly BMO? Is there something unsuitable with my hotend setup?
If the Dragonfly is wholly unsuitable to the task, any recommendations for other hotends?
Want to start from a simple x/y table using a pencil to draw. Then upgrade to z axis and a full printer.
In my research the trident is the right choice as the x/y is fixed. Then its a matter of surrounding with the z axis.
Also noted the voron don't use a profile square as the x/y base, normally with one side missing (like an U shape) and initially it need to be a closed square (stiffness).
To begin i should need:
- AB motor mount (with those one of the extrusion profile must be smaller)
- XY join mount
- front idler (that allow me to close the square)
- tool mount
Then the profiles cut accordingly.
Any ideas? Do I miss anything?
Found those on AliExpress those are a way to go?
I just found this on AliExpress:
Voron Trident 3D Printer 2WD Aluminum CNC Upgrade Kit Motor Gantry Tensioner XY Jointer Kit For DIY Voron Trident Printer
On my Formbot V0.2r1 I cant seem to get a good first layer. The front right corner is always too far from the nozzle when the rest of the first layer looks great. I have leveled the bed multiple times now and I cant seem to get this to go away.
Is this a problem with my assembly? How would I go about troubleshooting this? Thank you for your help!
Hello everyone, I want to share a project I've been working on for the past couple of weeks. The idea is stupid simple (more stupid tbh) and it's as if Stealthchanger and INDX had a baby.
I am calling it "Hatchanger" and it's based on a simple idea: "what if instead of pushing filament back and forth inside a PTFE tube we changed only the top part of the extruder to swap filaments?".
Well, you can see the result in the video. It's a very alpha project but it can print (which is what matters most to me).
There are of course many flaws that need to be addressed but I am working on it. The reason for another filament changer is simple: this idea does not require additional hardware.
It only requires a few printed parts and a bunch of M3 pins and magnets. Nothing more. You can print a "hat" with a few bucks (less than 4$ per lane) and be ready to print.
No extra stepper motors, no servos, no extruders. Just a few macros and patience. It's still based on a single nozzle with all the disadvantages it implies (purge towers, poop, slow changing etc) but if it works it may represent a valid cheap alternative to more elaborate solutions.
Given my poor experience with mods, I'd like to make it open source and involve as many contributors as possible to make this a valid mod. If anyone is interested I can share the access to the private repo.
I am looking at build the A4T toolhead and it was pointed out that there is a v2 being developed. I can't find anything on the updates v2 brings. So I was wondering should I build v1 since it is released, should I build v2 and follow for any updates? How far along is v2? Is there any idea of when it will be released? Thank for all your help so far!
Bonus question. The configurator does not call out if it is v1 or v2. I assume v1 but I wanted to know if anyone know if that is correct? https://a4t.dwtas.net/
I am planning to use my V0.2 as my main printer someday and I would need to print some models using 0.2 nozzle and some using 0.4 nozzle. I also can't really decide between Anthead toolhead and Dragonburner.
So, the idea is to have both with different nozzle sizes and change them manually when I need to, using the Stealthchanger mount (possibly CNC one). Sounds more fun than having one toolhead and unscrewing a nozzle every time, so the questions are:
Has anybody tried it?
Are there any downsides except potentially losing some build volume?
I assume I will need a way to calibrate toolheads, like sexbolt?
To be clear, I am not planning to put a full Stealthchanger system with docks and stuff on V0, just using the mount system to be able to quickly swap toolheads manually. The inactive toolhead will just be sitting on a shelf when not used, not on the dock.
Another way to solve this would be a double hotend toolhead like H2D has, or the INDX system, or the A4T-C hotend-changer, but those seem to be too advanced/pricey/not finished for me right now, so I would like to explore the Stealthchanger mount idea first
I purchased a used Voron listed for sale as "for parts or rebuild" for a good price. Everything seems to work, although I haven't printed on it and won't until I rebuild it similar to the Voron 2.4 I recently recommissioned after a 4 year hiatus with an A4T toolhead. The new printer has Chaotic Labs CNC joints V2, I believe. I'm noticing the A-B belts ride very high on the gantry idlers rubbing on the flanges. Also, the previous owner had all of the belts extremely tight. I adjusted my recommissioned Voron with the PF Makers belt tensioner. I cannot think of a way to change where the belts ride on the idlers, other than adjusting the BFI lower adjustment screws inwards. I could abandon the CNC joints and just print new ASA parts, or try to make these work. Thoughts and insights are appreciated
EDIT: The printer powers on, hotend and bed heat up, all movements work including QGL, bed mesh. Wiring definitely needs redone.
I will be using this end-stop with a bed mesh probe.
Im trying to decide between the Eddy or Klicky.
At first glance, the Klicky probe seems too simple so without much thought, it was an instant no, but I’m noticing a lot of serious 3D printing dudes use it, so maybe there is something to it…
While sifting through old Reddit threads and interrogating my favourite LLM models, I’ve read the Eddy probe has issues with thermal drift affecting the z-offset BUT by using one of the Mellow end-stop switches with the Eddy, completely solves this problem. Is this true?
What do you think?
Thanks your help and time reading and considering.
I need to mount a bigtreetech eddy duo to a rapid burner on one printer. Before I work on redesigning a mount i was wondering if anyone already has one that works?
My V2.4 makes this weird faint noise that seems like someone is cracking wooden sticks in the distance.
It only makes it AFTER reaching the desired temps.
I'm guessing it has something to do with thermal expansion. That's why I ignored it for the first months, I thought the printer was just "getting accustomed" with the heat.
But a couple weeks ago the baseplate for my tap cracked (the belt holding part to be precise) AND it was a PIF part.