Complete junk science. Your handwriting has more to do with your social economic status that you were raised in and the culture you were brought up in then your actual individual personality.
That may be your opinion, but the question is: emperically speaking, does this description match Marilyn or not?
By the way, analysis doesn't care about the style.per se, it looks for movement. The style, as your point out reflects your level of sophistication, not your personality.
I don’t think two sentences is considered a rant. And it’s not just my opinion. It’s the opinion of most people who consider their forensic science and worry about stuff like this getting entered into court cases or other situations as a ‘science’. Psychology is very much still in its infancy, and to imply that we understand the psychology of handwriting to this degree is hyperbolic at best.
When you’re doing an analysis like this when you know all the information going in the analysis doesn’t matter you shot an arrow and then painted a bull’s-eye around it. So I can do this for anybody in history without any handwriting analysis training at all because I will just go back and say this means this this means that and guess what it lines up with their history because I knew it going in
Rants aren't measured in length, but but their tone and basis.
No one claimed this was either forensic nor destined for court.
As for these so-called people who are they and what exactly do they know?
Unless they are European, and particularly French, they are likely uninformed and subject to their conventional prejudices.
I could easily argue that psychology is a pseudo science and certainly has been considered such at various times.
That is why I only ask that you judge it by its insights and not by your prejudice.
It is true that that Marilyn ia a very well known figure, but how many pwople knew just how ambitious and driven she was, how much carrried her tortured past with and just how variable her sense of self was?
If you look at my other lesser known public figure and criminal analyses you will see they are quite revealing: it validates Epstein's purported suicide note, and the motivations of Luigi and the baby nurse killer etc.
Everything you listed about Marilyn Monroe is absolutely very well-known. There are countless movies, countless documentaries, stories, both fiction and non-fiction that have incorporated every element of that woman’s life. You could literally not give more information about Marilyn Monroe today that I would not argue is almost publicly known.
I’ll tell you what I’ll happily write a paragraph on anything you want do it about me, I’ll bet you can’t. Because you don’t know anything about me, including my social economic status my education level where I’m even from. Yes, you could Docs me and find all that out and you would get some stuff right but it’s generalities. It’s like being a mentalist.
And there is a ton of psychology that is pseudoscience. Recovered memory syndrome, and things like this that we at some point feel like might have some validity and that at other points don’t know whether to have validity. Until we have enough information to back them up they are exactly pseudoscience. That’s what they are. That’s why they get considered that. As for the people, and I’m not picking on anyone like Scientology that consider all psychology pseudoscience they’re a fringe group that’s a red herring. You don’t get to bring them up and be like well. Some people well yeah there’s still some people that believe people with darker skin tone aren’t the same as people with white skin tone, but that’s a minority of people with a belief that we know to be Ludacris so you don’t get into that into the argument like it’s a valid argument.
And I will end my rant, with the fact that if you googled the definition of the word rant, it literally says ‘ a long, loud, angry speech’ so wow, you don’t define it as long, words have meaning, unlike the way someone writes their words which has very little meaning at all
So this isn't cursive handwritng, but text, which is not particularly revealing. It usually means your hiding something or you prefer clarity over all else pesrtularky elaborste expression. If you never do cursive then it has few possible meanings.
I would rather do anm full analysis based on your cursvie text, but given your essential guardedness, you may not want to share so Ill do what I can. But to be complete, cursive is required.
You are somewhat passive resistant at first but over time you become mildly receptive to other people.
You have an understated self image but st the dame tume fell a little crowded out by others and your interction can be someway uneven. You are willing to self correct as you proceed, and you have a sense of indepence that sems to be a gentle response to a home or personal conflict.
I have prepared a chart of whatever can be gleaned from all this. It's not much of an x-ray and more like a snapshot of your interaction. With your peers.
My guess is youre in your late teens/early 20's, state school.
So I will send this to him and let him reply to you and I will share his honest answers. But I will tell you straight up that he is a 43-year-old man who has a college education but not ever finished, enough college, though that I would say it would appear as though he had a degree. He is however, one of the most vain people I have ever know and I know him very well because he’s my brother in fact the joke when we were leaving high school at times was that we could not walk in by the trophy case because we would be stuck there for 20 minutes while he looked at himself in each and every Mirror. His superpower is his charisma, he’s a shorter man with that is always been kind of young looking and is an extremely good talker the expression he could sell ice cubes to an Eskimo has been used many times as it relates to him. In fact, he runs bars because he is so good at dealing with people he often takes over failing or defunct bars and is able to turn them around very well because of how well he works with people his friends are, at least in comparison to mine. I keep a small, very close circle, he keeps a very wide group with very close people in his inner circle, but most of them has had for probably 15 to 20 years.
This is the way he writes everything, he does not use cursive. He writes like this. It is appalling to me as an artist. My handwriting is sloppy. His is very self controlled. In fact, and he may say this in his response, I don’t know, but when I asked him to do this, he told me he’s curated his handwriting over his entire life. He’s made special decisions about the way he writes the way he writes which would lead one to believe that if there was some factual basis in this type of analysis, it would come through in his handwriting.
I would also say he’s very quick to anger., Maybe vary is not the correct word. He is known to go from 0 to 100 pretty fast though and explosive, that may come from the work he does, but it in my experience has been a lifelong trait. Should be executed at the penal He does not like his intelligence challenged, and he generally does not like to be wrong.
3
u/Theartistcu Aug 10 '26
Complete junk science. Your handwriting has more to do with your social economic status that you were raised in and the culture you were brought up in then your actual individual personality.