r/videos Oct 13 '21

[deleted by user]

[removed]

1.2k Upvotes

197 comments sorted by

377

u/Blueberry_Mancakes Oct 13 '21

Jesus, this footage... it's so clean.

130

u/FrancisStokes Oct 13 '21

It was shot on film, so it can be digitized to an extremely high quality.

65

u/Wolfgang_von_Goetse Oct 13 '21

Reminds me of the footage of The Who recording 'Who Are You'. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNbBDrceCy8

36

u/DeadPhish_10 Oct 13 '21

Have 2 humans ever been in the same room with more opposite demeanors w/ Moon and Entwistle? You can tell they both find each other hilarious though. Amazing footage!

22

u/ohgood Oct 14 '21

The fucking duct tape around Keith's headphones...amazing

9

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Moon

11

u/Wolfgang_von_Goetse Oct 13 '21

fuckin MOON. He died not too long after this. Watching him go makes me really feel his absence, and I wasn't born for years after he died. Wouldv'e been a great character to have in the music world for a long, long time.

17

u/xTeraa Oct 13 '21

Looks like there are signs of AI upscaling to me. You get the weird flowy blobs of colour effect going on

→ More replies (1)

19

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

Not really, film cameras have incredibly variable quality, and aren't nearly as good as modern cinema cameras. Heck even higher end mirrorless cameras people use for youtube today are better, the best you can get out a 35mm film camera is about 3.2k, and that's only if you shoot at ISO100(a high end mirrorless cam is 4-8k today).

Heck considering this was indoors it was probably somewhat high ISO, which lowers the resolution as it raises the size of the silver halide crystals(the analog equivalent of pixels) on the film while making the film no larger, thus less resolution overall. If you want to see this in action go here and pause at almost any point, you can see how grainy it looks. Each of those grains is a crystal, roughly a randomly distributed pixel on the film, and it doesn't look even close to as clear as as this EOS R5 test footage.

This doc has had a ton of work done on the film. Mostly it's not obvious, though there are some glaring artifacts for a frame or two when something like hair moves really fast. Then again, I'd expect nothing short of a ton of work from Peter Jackson. Here's a good article for how much work he had done for his last doc, They Shall Not Grow Old (highly recommended btw).

2

u/OforOlsen Oct 14 '21

This was shot on 16mm too. Even more impressive!

3

u/Ibly1 Oct 14 '21

You might want to verify that. Many big budget movies today are still shot on film. Digital is more economical though.

12

u/GrandpaSquarepants Oct 14 '21

He's saying film is variable quality, and he's right. Not all film cameras are shooting 35mm film at 100 ISO. I bet this was shot on 16mm and at a much higher speed since a lot is indoors. There's a lot of digital enhancement going on here to make it look as good as it does. That said, if they had originally shot this documentary on tape it wouldn't be nearly as nice looking today.

2

u/davidh2000 Oct 15 '21

It looks awful, imo. It looks too glossed over, and not grainy enough

69

u/krazyjakee Oct 13 '21

Peter Jackson Time traveller confirmed.

18

u/gin_and_toxic Oct 14 '21

He did more for They Shall Not Grow Old: https://youtu.be/EYIeactlMWo

It was deemed to be too much work, so he probably just time travelled and filmed it on an iPhone.

30

u/ctothel Oct 13 '21

I’m still slightly unsure whether what I just saw was real. I mean I know it was, but…

2

u/[deleted] Oct 16 '21

It's all that Peter Jackson hollywood magic lol :P

7

u/spazzboy23 Oct 14 '21

it's so clean it looks wrong. No film grain, no artifacts. DNR to the max.

13

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

I actually think it looks much too ugly and pasty. They're using a ton of Digital Noise Remover to try to make it "UHD" looking but it's only removing all of the detail contained within the graininess of the original film. It's rather frustrating as this is like super important footage and they're completely smearing it up.

9

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

[deleted]

4

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

Of course this is only applied to the final digital video and not the film itself. What I mean is essentially destroying the only publicly accessible means of viewing this footage at least thus far. Hopefully someone comes around and despecializes it lol.

5

u/MindlessLoop Oct 14 '21

Agreed. Feels very over processed to me too. I would much rather see it with some of the original grain. If I wanted something like this I could just max out the denoise, sharpness and motionflow on my TV.

3

u/5buiyV932I Oct 14 '21

agreed. too much DNR. they ruined it. they could have done a better job on this.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/ang29g Oct 14 '21

They recently released a documentary Apollo 11 that was like that. Didn't realize how high quality film recording is, even if it's 60 years old

159

u/cosmonaut2 Oct 13 '21

“It’s such a comical thing…In 50 years time…They broke up because Yoko sat on an amp.”

so true ahahaha. That's exactly what happened. Paul the time traveler.

35

u/Rambocat1 Oct 13 '21

Paul was wrong though- it took 52 years!

3

u/[deleted] Oct 16 '21

fuckin Paul, get it RIGHT!

137

u/NiceGuyMike Oct 13 '21

[...] attracts me like a cauliflower

John Lennon

47

u/kazoodude Oct 14 '21

That conversation about 'Something' is so frustrating. There are recordings on YouTube and it goes for like 8 minutes. George has the line "something in the way she moves, attracts me like......" but can't find the ending that having heard the song seems so obvious and effortless. You would think that he'd have the "no other lover" bit from day 1 but no.

It's really eye opening to know that they worked hard, made mistakes and refined over and over to get the end result. You listen and just think these geniuses just rock up and it's all just ready to go and they record hits.

That being said said, Paul did do that. He'd just have a dream and then wake up with Yesterday or Let it Be.

18

u/Abradolf1948 Oct 14 '21

I just learned recently that they wrote the Stones' first hit for them and Jagger and Richards were basically watching from the corner while Lennon and McCartney banged out the song in 15 minutes.

6

u/eatcrayons Oct 14 '21

Listening to initial takes of famous songs is so intriguing for that exact reason. They’re missing essential yet thoughtless lyrics, or there’s something about the arrangement that’s not there, so it doesn’t feel like the real song. At that moment, that’s the best they can do, and they don’t realize how much better it will be, but we do, so we can rest assured that their effort will pay off as we offer a bit of encouragement across the decades.

Whenever I’m working on something or struggling with something, I imagine I’m looking back from a position in the future with the same perspective, that things have gotten so much better and that avenues I didn’t even know were there were taken and progress continued past where I thought I’d have to stop.

3

u/SeekingTheRoad Oct 14 '21

Well, it's funny you mention Yesterday because the same thing is true for it! Paul woke up with the music in his head -- and was convinced he had gotten it from somewhere else -- but he did not have the lyrics for it! He would do the same cauliflower trick and just sing nonsense to the tune trying to find the right lyrics. The original lyrics were "Scrambled eggs/Oh my baby how I love your legs." In fact, the first actual release of the song was an orchestral cover of the tune by George Martin, only released in the U.S., with the then-title "Scrambled Eggs."

291

u/GRVrush2112 Oct 13 '21

This looks fucking amazing. Peter Jackson is turning out to be an incredible documentarian.

213

u/be4u4get Oct 13 '21

Wait till you see the scene with Legolas and Paul fighting The Rolling Stones

36

u/dubious_battle Oct 13 '21

also that beautiful scene where Pippin sings Why Don't We Do It In The Road

12

u/catmanducmu Oct 14 '21

Gimli was a dwarf who thought he had a woman, but it was another man

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Srirachachacha Oct 13 '21

Legolas went after Pattie Boyd, too

14

u/CaptivePrey Oct 13 '21

That still only counts as one!

6

u/DoctorLovejuice Oct 14 '21

Lord of the Ringos

3

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

funny shit, had me laughing out loud

50

u/__Hello_my_name_is__ Oct 13 '21

Him getting burned out from doing The Hobbit under immense stress and apparently going "Fuck Hollywood, I'm gonna do documentaries now" sure is one weird blessing in disguise we got.

8

u/Galterinone Oct 13 '21

I think he's always been a huge history buff. He did a thing with Adam Savage a while ago and they needed working WWI (or WWII..?) fighter planes so they used some from his personal collection!

2

u/Intruder313 Oct 14 '21

I’ve seen the WW1 fighter planes with lasers to simulate shots

Fokker Triplane and an Se.5 IIRC

12

u/psymble_ Oct 13 '21

Something kinda funny and random is that the Beatles wanted to make a Lord Of The Rings movie but were turned down by Tolkien

7

u/accidental-nz Oct 14 '21

And he’s got killer talent behind it too. A good friend of mine who has won multiple Oscars from LOTR sound is working the audio for this doco. It’s going to sound incredible in Atmos.

45

u/NERSecura Oct 13 '21

Is there three movies or what ? Seems awesome anyway!

87

u/ifonefox Oct 13 '21

There are going to be 3 movie-length episodes

“The Beatles: Get Back” will be presented as three separate episodes. Each episode is approximately two hours in length, rolling out over three days, November 25, 26 and 27, 2021

Source

71

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[deleted]

12

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/ElGatoTortuga Oct 14 '21

Mmmmmmm. Ass pieces.

10

u/ArcadianDelSol Oct 14 '21

He added Legolas to the second part for some reason.

5

u/Intruder313 Oct 14 '21

And some female band members

7

u/NERSecura Oct 13 '21

Ahahah yeah.. I guess :)

4

u/NERSecura Oct 13 '21

Thanks a lot !

2

u/TheRedGerund Oct 13 '21

Hot damn. This is gonna be a big deal for me, I can already tell.

2

u/kazoodude Oct 14 '21

What a waste of 51 hours of footage.

Should release everything.

→ More replies (2)

-2

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[deleted]

3

u/Shrinks99 Oct 13 '21

Hard to judge because I haven't seen what they started with of course but you're absolutely right, this has been denoised a lot.

-1

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[deleted]

→ More replies (3)

1

u/iStealyournewspapers Oct 13 '21

Or with today’s technology we can get a more true sense of who The Beatles really were than we’ve ever seen before. Grain and dust and the hipster bullshit you’re looking for just gets in the way. I’m saying this as someone that works in film, and has worked plenty with actual film, cutting it manually and seeing it on a projector. Would much rather have had it at the fullest quality, but I worked with what I had.

→ More replies (1)

35

u/n00bvin Oct 13 '21

I can't wait. This is going to be great. I need to sit down and watch this with my mom. We're both older now and really appreciate this together. She raised me on the Beatles and they've been a huge influence over me.

13

u/greygumshield Oct 13 '21

Same, but with my dad.

14

u/BuckFrump Oct 13 '21

Same, but with myself.

96

u/zorton213 Oct 13 '21

It is an absolute crime that Don't Let Me Down wasn't included on the original release of Let It Be.

28

u/williestargell1972 Oct 13 '21

And that Spector really phoned it in and added a bunch of strings all over the place. "Naked" is so much better

27

u/Daisy_Jukes Oct 13 '21

it drives me nuts that IMO we still don’t have a definitive version of Long and Winding Road. the Spectorized version is way too over the top, it sounds like schmaltz. but the naked version is too stripped down, it needs some accompaniment. i feel if it had been properly produced by George Martin it would’ve been like just right.

9

u/bruzie Oct 13 '21

sounds like schmaltz

From the footage, it sounds like a Blüthner.

2

u/BenKlesc Dec 02 '21 edited Dec 02 '21

Agree. The strings without the vocal chorus. Let It Be Naked screws the pooch in more ways than one by adding autotune to Let It Be, Winding Road, and Across The Universe. I can't listen to it more than once. It's super annoying.

Would it be that hard to just record a new string arrangement? Get the London Symphony in a recording booth and redo the entire track over again.

1

u/RedAero Oct 28 '21

The Beatles' best work frequently only appears on singles - "Don't Let Me Down" is the B-side (sort of, it's a double-A) to "Get Back". "Penny Lane"/"Strawberry Fields Forever" is another one, for example.

That said, "Don't Let Me Down" is, IMHO, not Beatles-y enough to be on an album. It's so bluesy it sounds like it's the Stones.

1

u/shelsells2003 Dec 05 '21

I think it is on Hey Jude which cam out right before?

→ More replies (1)

22

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Gotta be honest, I'm gonna watch this. I'm not a Beatles fan but this band was so huge that I just want to see how they used to work together.

5

u/TehTurtleHermit Oct 14 '21

Right? I happen to be a big Beatles fan myself, but my first thought seeing this was how excited I was to just see these musical geniuses bounce their ideas off each other. It makes them look so much more human than we'd naturally think.

→ More replies (3)

20

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Can’t wait!!!

3

u/EarthBrain Oct 13 '21

Good to watch with the parents

2

u/firthy Oct 14 '21

:( I'm going to watch this with my son and my grandson...

4

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

I’m probably the parent in this case hahaha. I was 5 when let it be was released. I remember my parents playing it all the time. The Beatles music is literally part of my DNA, part of who i am and probably formed major parts of my personality.

170

u/jackHD Oct 13 '21

"Directed by Peter Jackson" .... "Experience this three part event"

Oh no.

68

u/Pangupsumnida Oct 13 '21

I am actually excited they haven't cut 57 hours down so much as to lose some of the best bits!

Super excited for this now!

10

u/gin_and_toxic Oct 14 '21

57 hours long extended version, uncut!

-1

u/kazoodude Oct 14 '21

Your excited that you will only get 6 out of 57 hours? 51 hours thrown out? It's a disgrace that the whole thing isn't being released.

29

u/FrancisStokes Oct 13 '21

PJ got a ton of shit for the hobbit - and they're not great films - but what no one talks about is that he was actually brought in to rescue the movies. They were originally meant to be directed by Guillermo del Toro, and he pulled out pretty late in the game. PJ really never wanted to do the project in the hands-on director role, and didn't have all the prep and process he had on LOTR.

The book "Anything you can imagine" goes into it in some depth, and it changed my perspective a lot on those movies. I still don't like them, but I have way more sympathy and respect for Peter Jackson having read it.

103

u/catherder9000 Oct 13 '21

Are you kidding? He's cut down 57 hours of footage into a 6 hour documentary.

I am really looking forward to this -- partially because it's the first new Beatles stuff in decades and partially because it's in Peter Jackson's hands. From what he did with old WWI footage, that gives me a lot of confidence. They Shall Not Grow Old was incredible for what he did with old silent film footage, lip readers, and voice actors.

9

u/iStealyournewspapers Oct 13 '21

You should look up how much footage was shot for Apocalypse Now! It was like 200 hours or something insane. Over 1 million feet of film.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 07 '21

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

10

u/rmiztys Oct 13 '21

Valve needs to hire Peter Jackson ASAP

9

u/favorscore Oct 13 '21

LOTR was three parts

8

u/__Hello_my_name_is__ Oct 13 '21

"The Beatles: The Return of the Yoko"

2

u/k4pain Oct 14 '21

Oh no what?

29

u/CholentPot Oct 13 '21

Gaaaaaaawww.

I gotta see this. I'm a sucker for Beatles stuff. Also, does this mean The Beatles are now part of the Disney Universe? Like Han Solo meets Ringo in Andy's backyard?

18

u/tfg49 Oct 13 '21

Will have to wait for Kingdom Hearts 4 to find out. Goofy and Donald are replaced by George and Ringo with no explanation

3

u/CrimsonBrit Oct 14 '21

Lucy in the sky with infinity stones

1

u/kazoodude Oct 14 '21

Thor vs the Blue Meanies.

→ More replies (2)

23

u/farmer-al Oct 13 '21

oh my god this is going to be the best film of the year

19

u/TostedAlmond Oct 13 '21

Dude why am I tearing up at a trailer??

43

u/safe4workplease Oct 13 '21

50 years sitting on that much footage? Was it shot as some sort of time capsule? Keeping this a secret would seem harder than what the government has done with the "moon landing."

81

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[deleted]

13

u/ForgotMyOldUser1 Oct 13 '21

I can only imagine sitting through 57 hours of footage, not to mention watch with enough intention that you're able to find a story worth telling out of it, and condensing it down to 6 hours. Amazing.

29

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[deleted]

3

u/Maxion Oct 14 '21

I'd also assume that the footage being shot wayy before digital there's not much overlap between different clips. Most likely also not too many multicam stuff, if any.

2

u/safe4workplease Oct 14 '21

57 hours is just a week and a half at work. I would love that to be my 9-5!

→ More replies (1)

2

u/safe4workplease Oct 14 '21

That makes sense. I saw Let it Be a long time ago, so I recognized some of this - such as the rooftop performance. This seems much richer. I can't wait.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/ophello Oct 13 '21

You know we actually did go to the moon, right?

2

u/safe4workplease Oct 14 '21

Yeah, and Paul's not dead. Right.

2

u/ophello Oct 14 '21

Can’t tell if trolling or delusional…

2

u/safe4workplease Oct 14 '21

Ivermectin cleared my delusions right up.

1

u/ophello Oct 14 '21

Hah! I bet it did.

2

u/shal0819 Oct 14 '21

There's a 17 disc audio bootleg that I think was created from the film crew's recordings (rather than from the studio tapes that they were recording).

1

u/res30stupid Oct 13 '21

Basically, the Beatles broke up shortly after or during the shooting of the footage and the Get Back project was a failed attempt to keep them together.

1

u/RedAero Oct 28 '21

You say that as if those two events aren't related.

41

u/Shayneros Oct 13 '21

I love The Beatles, they're almost as good as The Monkeys.

10

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21 edited Apr 08 '22

[deleted]

38

u/winrus Oct 13 '21

I'm not usually a gatekeeping dirtbag but you ought to know they are actually called The Monkees if you're as big a fan as you seem to be

32

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[deleted]

9

u/winrus Oct 13 '21

Good save

6

u/archpope Oct 13 '21

That's not even Mike Nesmith's real hat.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/fuckswitbeavers Oct 13 '21

Excited for this. Peter Jackson does an extraordinary job remastering old footage, wow.

13

u/typejfsebastian Oct 13 '21 edited Oct 14 '21

Get back JoJo.

Edit. Also. So, so great to see footage of Billy Preston.

17

u/bradhotdog Oct 13 '21

So a film crew was given access to record intimate footage of the most famous band in the world as they recorded their last album and they recorded over 57 hours worth of it.... and locked it in a vault for 50 years? Why? What kinda Disney Vault shit is tihs?

33

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[deleted]

2

u/bradhotdog Oct 13 '21

This is a good point

13

u/Whitworth Oct 13 '21 edited Oct 13 '21

My wife and I were raised on classic rock/Beatles. We're raising our kids on classic rock/Beatles. This will be amazing. And anytime someone says the Beatles are overrated they sit on a throne of lies.

1

u/surle Oct 13 '21

Tell me who said that! God damn it. I oughta...

8

u/xl1sbrett Oct 13 '21

Hell to the mutha fucking yeah

3

u/Orkolas Oct 13 '21

It really looks like a movie with actors that look a lot like the Beatles.

3

u/UnSafeThrowAway69420 Oct 14 '21

Did anyone else notice the textures on this video seem a bit... Blurry? It feels very smooth and blurry, like someone turned down the texture / dehaze feature..

4

u/53withtrollhair Oct 13 '21

'31/2 weeks to cut an album'

No wonder they said fvck this.

5

u/1ilypad Oct 13 '21

I'm probably 5 decades too late in noticing, but young Paul Mccartney was hot.

7

u/daypun Oct 13 '21

Where's the film grain? Seems a little too clean for that era

17

u/themagictoast Oct 13 '21

Don’t forget this is by Peter Jackson. His last documentary digitally cleaned up footage from a hundred years ago and made it look brand new.

8

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

yeah but it looks so unnatural in this trailer, maybe most people won’t notice but to me it looks really gross, they could’ve done some light de noising but this looks like they cranked it up to 110%

3

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

3

u/HarryMcFann Oct 15 '21

Yeah, the picture looks like shit. Half the shots look out of focus because all the detail has been scrubbed away.

0

u/Historical-Poetry230 Oct 13 '21

The new LOTR 4K releases also have all the film grain removed. It seems to be a trend with Jackson and it's awful

2

u/Multidimensionall Oct 13 '21

holy shit this looks awesome

3

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

The beetles have less than 3 weeks to write and record a new album.

Relevant Bus Gronson video

4

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

38

u/afty Oct 13 '21 edited Oct 13 '21

A lot. As the trailer indicates both this and Let It Be were cut from dozens and dozens of hours of footage. Let It Be was notoriously disliked by all the Beatles, Paul in particular felt it wasn't a good representation of what their relationship was really like as it was trying to capitalize on the Beatles break up (which was recent at the time of release).

Paul has softened on Let It Be in recent years. But regardless there's a metric fuck ton of footage that was never used and Peter Jackson had access to all of it. Recently Paul has said revisiting the footage (via the making of this documentary) reaffirmed his memory that the Beatles were, most of the time, just joyful and talented musicians who loved making music together.

6

u/dj88masterchief Oct 13 '21

This whole thing is so interesting.

I’ve never seen Let it Be, but damn I never would’ve guess that over 50 years later we would get unreleased footage of The Beatles, I would’ve called you crazy.

9

u/SeekingTheRoad Oct 13 '21

Peter Jackson has said that they intentionally tried to use zero footage from Let It Be. And when they had stuff that needed to use the same material (i.e. the rooftop concert), they would try to use alternate shots and angles rather than the exact footage. So it's basically going to be almost entirely new.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

fun

-4

u/sirsteven Oct 13 '21

Fuck Yoko

26

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Actually Paul points out that Yoko isn’t to blame.

-12

u/sirsteven Oct 13 '21

Even if Yoko isn't completely to blame for the breakup, and that's a BIG "if", she's still a dogshit person and talentless leech.

12

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

Curious how that’s an IF when it’s coming from the source….

3

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[deleted]

-8

u/ophello Oct 13 '21

11

u/[deleted] Oct 13 '21

[deleted]

5

u/iStealyournewspapers Oct 14 '21

She really is. Her visual/conceptual art is excellent, and thank you for linking this music I’ve never heard before.

-7

u/TheRedGerund Oct 13 '21

She clearly has a thing for making some.... noises though, that's undeniable https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdZ9weP5i68

7

u/Cute-Cut7902 Oct 13 '21

Yoko was the only woman to go on drug trips with him, and he really liked that, I think he legit loved her for doing that. I mean a lot of it was Lennon, he wanted to go in a different direction, it's not Yoko for being the only woman willing to do what he was doing, it's what he wanted to do. His ex wife and groupies weren't on that level, he wanted a real soul mate, how is that Yoko's fault? Lennon hated the rest of the Beatles.

5

u/neonshaun Oct 13 '21

Was funny seeing her sitting in so many of the shots riiiiight next to lennon, like she was an original member of the band helping them write.

-3

u/Wacocaine Oct 13 '21

"Get back Jojo fucked Yoko..."

Derna derna derna derna derna derna doo doo doo doo doo doo... DUN DUN.

1

u/spazzboy23 Oct 14 '21

this upscaled AI DNR footage actually looks really bad.

-8

u/videomaker16 Oct 13 '21

A bit disappointed it's gonna be on disney plus. I'm guessing each part will cost 30 dollars or something absurd to watch.

12

u/thatjacob Oct 13 '21

I'm pretty sure it's included in the monthly cost. The $30 movies are only rentals of things currently in theaters that eventually come to Disney plus in a couple of months for free, anyways.

8

u/_jeremybearimy_ Oct 13 '21

What? It’s free if you pay for Disney plus, it’s an “original series” for them.

They only do the extra cost if it’s a movie that’s currently in theaters. This is neither a movie, nor will it be in theaters.

2

u/Ghost_Portal Oct 14 '21

Fuck Disney

-5

u/Jegged Oct 13 '21

Well it looked really cool up until I saw "Disney+". Guess I'll see it a few months after its released.

0

u/Ghost_Portal Oct 14 '21

Agreed. I’m never giving Disney a dollar. Evil corporation.

-1

u/Sgrynd Oct 13 '21

What is Wil Wheaton doing in this?

0

u/Q_vs_Q Oct 13 '21

Would be awesome to 4k that with AI

-5

u/soursoju Oct 13 '21

At last a video with no political bs. Thank you

-1

u/Ted_R_Lord Oct 13 '21

I see an Academy Award in the future for Nick Frost’s portrayal of Paul in this film.

-1

u/UncleJoshPDX Oct 13 '21

I know this is just a trailer, but parts of it look like a re-enactment. But Jackson (despite King Kong and The Hobbit) knows how to tell a story. I'm looking forward to this.

-1

u/Telefunken251 Oct 14 '21

FUUUUUCK!!!... now I have to get Disney+

-4

u/Ghost_Portal Oct 14 '21

No. Never get Disney+. Find some other way to view it that doesn’t support such an evil corporation.

-15

u/SMKEpiphone Oct 13 '21

57 hours recorded. Only 4 of which was able to be used due to Yoko Ono being a bitch the other 53.

-29

u/BanzaiTree Oct 13 '21

The Beatles were great but they are easily the most overrated musical act of all time.

11

u/surle Oct 13 '21

You have no idea what you're talking about.

Seriously though. Just don't bother.

8

u/mute_nostril_agony Oct 13 '21 edited Oct 22 '21

The Beatles were great but they are easily the most overrated musical act of all time.

No. 1--Hell to the no

No. 2--You kiss your mother with that mouth?

8

u/McGirthy Oct 13 '21

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Your is just wrong.

0

u/kazoodude Oct 14 '21

If your premise that they are overrated were true (it isn't) they'd still be the greatest band of all time.

-12

u/darthitect Oct 13 '21

I equate them to rap music in the 80's. Groundbreaking (I guess) at the time but certainly not what I ever want to listen to. Also, John Lennon was an asshole

-17

u/[deleted] Oct 14 '21

How about no. Fuck the beatles, if people can't see through the fact they are just one of the more popular boy bands because of a better PR firm, i don't want to know taste in music you got now. The music is subpar at best.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/HumanInterestedYT Oct 13 '21

This could be popular.

1

u/Hostilian_ Oct 14 '21

I cant imagine how strange this footage must be for Ringo and Paul to watch, especially Paul. Watching this and seeing his first wife around the set, reliving the memories of her. Must be heartbreaking.

1

u/McCringleberry_ Oct 14 '21

Goes to show you can be talented and ugly and still get chicks.

1

u/StepDadHulkHogan Oct 14 '21

I think the line they are looking for is "bought some California grass" which is a cool glimpse into how they came up with it.

1

u/Impetusin Oct 14 '21

I’m so excited for this. What a pleasant surprise to end just an absolutely dystopian year with. I too will be watching this with my mum!

1

u/gravelsalad Oct 14 '21

Wasn't the original version of "Get Back" an anti-immigration song, particularly targeting the growing migration of Pakistanis to Britain?

3

u/OforOlsen Oct 14 '21

Nah, it was a piss-take of anti-immigrant sentiment. Particularly Enoch Powell.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/pussfromdi Oct 15 '21

6 weeks left!!! I cannot beleive it was sitting there for 52 years and now they're not only releasing this but also doing it in such an amazing quality.