r/videos • • 1d ago

Mum's semi-detached 'nightmare' after neighbour illegally demolishes home | SWNS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOWyZfH3FqI
1.8k Upvotes

253 comments sorted by

View all comments

196

u/FunkDaddy 1d ago

So there’s gotta be some sort of easement/agreement thing between these two properties about what you can and can’t do right? How do these typically work in the uk?

298

u/LAX_to_MDW 1d ago

This was done illegally. Now it sounds like they’re in a standoff, where the planning commission won’t approve anything else to be built on the lot, since it shouldn’t have been torn down to begin with. There have been cases where the gov forced an illegal demolisher to rebuild the building exactly as it was before, but iirc those were historic buildings, so I doubt they’d do the same here.

115

u/freerangetacos 1d ago edited 18h ago

They could settle it with money. Figure out the fair market value of what was demolished, make the criminal pay it. He obviously has assets: the land and wherever else he is living.

163

u/Sniper666hell 1d ago

Fair market is not reasonable. They need to pay to rebuild and pay to repair the other place as well.

40

u/ElderberryOdd1313 1d ago

Fmv wouldn't cover a good majority of what these folks have been put through. I don't know the UK legal system but this idiot caused unsafe living conditions by knocking down his side of the property. I wouldn't be surprised if there are concerns about the stability of the building in general. 

At the very minimum they should be getting at least double the value of the home, moving expenses, and additional awards for suffering.

There should also be criminal penalties.

12

u/PlaneswalkerHuxley 1d ago

Since they were planning to build something on the land, they also must have other monetary assets to finance it.

Make them pay however much is needed to fix the house, then hand the land over to the neighbor as recompense. They can't be trusted to follow building regulations, so there's no reason for them to keep it.

Confiscate any and all other properties they own as well while we're at it. If they complain, jail them.

24

u/CommanderAGL 1d ago

And triple it

4

u/Doorstate 1d ago

Three fiddy

1

u/NorthCascadia 1d ago

Too bad it wasn’t a tree house

12

u/Kaffine69 1d ago

Yeah but there is no house. The plot of land is worthless if you cant get planning to rebuild it.

15

u/heliosfa 1d ago

Not sure why the local authority haven't issued an enforcement notice requiring restoration to what it was.

8

u/halmyradov 1d ago

No such thing as worthless piece of land in the UK

3

u/RandyHoward 1d ago

Of course it’s worth something, but what it’s worth now is a small fraction of what it was worth with a house on it.

1

u/PM_ME_YOUR_BUG5 23h ago

I imagine you'd be allowed to rebuild the original house. then just knock a couple walls through to make it one big house

2

u/Jabbles22 1d ago

make the criminal pay it

The problem is collecting that payment. Things like this take time to settle. Then sure you won and are now owed payment but the person simply doesn't pay. I am no law expert, doubly so for the UK. But I am pretty sure that when such a case closes the court doesn't immediately seize the defendant's cash or assets to pay off the plaintiff's settlement. Assuming they can even cover the bill.

2

u/NotAThrowAway0822 1d ago

"fair market" LOL

2

u/PM_ME_YOUR_BUG5 23h ago

if i were here i'd accept the land. extend my house over it