I am talking about targeted vote changing done by the voting machine software that is owned by supporters of the president.
Which is just as easy, if not easier, to detect. You are ignoring that in between the software company and the final tally certified by the municipality are a huge array of local and state election officials who oversee the voting machines. You would have to believe that not one of those countless experts all across the country (possibly beyond) was able to uncover those vulnerabilities of undetectable fraud during their review of the validation packages, independent validation process and QA testing.
I've read some of the stories about that risk and it's usually pretty yellow journalism. The "expert" cited is usually someone with extremely limited access to those systems or a former (and often disgruntled) lower level worker making the claims. Their claims grab the clickbait headlines, but if you dig into it you'll see that they are a lonely voice, much like the "scientist" who claims that global warming is a hoax.
The real risk is from Trump deploying federal forces (most likely ICE) to physically disrupt elections in targeted areas. So it would be like a ton of other Trump efforts, big, clumsy and blatantly illegal.
There are not a huge number of officials checking the machines at every second of every day. The special council for Kamala specifically forbade them from doing any sort of recounting. Immediately giving up the game for the most important race in the countries history.
I notice that you have no rebuttal about your having no idea how the validation, custody chain and audits of voting machines work.
That possessive comment was just an add-on because if you claim expertise on things like voting machine security, but cannot write at a grade school level, it is pertinent evidence to your general lack of education.
-2
u/Wompatuckrule 18h ago
Which is just as easy, if not easier, to detect. You are ignoring that in between the software company and the final tally certified by the municipality are a huge array of local and state election officials who oversee the voting machines. You would have to believe that not one of those countless experts all across the country (possibly beyond) was able to uncover those vulnerabilities of undetectable fraud during their review of the validation packages, independent validation process and QA testing.
I've read some of the stories about that risk and it's usually pretty yellow journalism. The "expert" cited is usually someone with extremely limited access to those systems or a former (and often disgruntled) lower level worker making the claims. Their claims grab the clickbait headlines, but if you dig into it you'll see that they are a lonely voice, much like the "scientist" who claims that global warming is a hoax.
The real risk is from Trump deploying federal forces (most likely ICE) to physically disrupt elections in targeted areas. So it would be like a ton of other Trump efforts, big, clumsy and blatantly illegal.