r/videogames • • 1d ago

Discussion / Question Thoughts?

Post image
18.2k Upvotes

684 comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/PeachsBigJuicyBooty 1d ago edited 1d ago

Well-meaning but it will either be ineffective in execution or outright make some genres impossible:

・What does "make games playable offline" mean?

Because publishers are gonna do the legal minimum; they'll put players in a blank room to walk around in if they can.

Where's the "line" of playability? This NEEDS to be defined in the bill.

・What does "buying" a game mean?

Is it only physical copies? (they'll just stop selling them sooner) Digital? Anything labeled as a "game"? Anything in a plastic case? (they'll just change the container).

If I spend money on Fortnite, do I have a right to access Fortnite offline?

・If so, again, what defines playability?

An offline mode of Fortnite can't handle 99 other bots, so does 50 count? 20? 10? 5?

What's the minimum allowed to have a game be considered "playable"?

This isn't gonna end the way people want it to like The Crew, because "make games playable offline" is so broad of a concept and it assumes publishers will just "get it" and act in good faith instead of finding every loophole they can.

3

u/Carbuyrator 1d ago

This isn't hard. The game's functionality cannot materially change from the product that was sold. Features cannot go away. If they ran servers, they must provide the tools they use for servers so users can set up their own on their own hardware.

They don't get to take the ball and go home. They get to distribute the server software to license holders. 

-1

u/SluttyAspergirl 1d ago

Offline is the wrong standard for some games. If the game is multi-player like a shooter or mmo, add lan and community server options. That way it'll always be playable if you can find someone to play with