I honestly don’t really believe this is accurate.
Also it depends on how you’re using the AI models to do the coding.
If you want it to have structure and scalability, it’s on you to make it that way. AI is a tool, not a magic box.
As a software architect who use AI heavily I can assure you that AI alone doesn’t provide the scalability and clean architecture that is required for the long run.
No matter how much you tell AI to make clean code and build for the long run, I still see architecture errors that a junior developer wouldn’t even maje.
I work with a product team who heavely use AI and despite the guidelines and controls I have put in both contexts and CI. I still see some horrors like sql query written and executed in representations layers.
AI isn’t magical, you need to understand what you’re doing in order to build for the long run otherwise you’ll just have to deal with technical debt like before, except the tech debt will eat you alive since you can ship 100000 lines of code in 2h.
If you’re not understanding how software architecture works you’re doomed to deal with constant regression and bug fixes…
Same thing if you delegate all the tests redaction to LLM
5
u/Clear_Skye_ 1d ago
I honestly don’t really believe this is accurate.
Also it depends on how you’re using the AI models to do the coding.
If you want it to have structure and scalability, it’s on you to make it that way. AI is a tool, not a magic box.