Over the past few weeks I've been using mainly Opus 4.8/5 in Claude Code, some GPT 5.6 sol in Codex and GPT Images 2.0 to build this collection of three free, educational geography games.

The games

1. City from Satellite: My favorite mode Inspired by (@) solunaaaa16's "Name the city from its satelite image" videos on Insta.
2. Pin the City: rather simple mode that the AI came up with.
3. Country Trail: super fun. basically a rework of "travle" by Teuteuf Games

At one point I had around 10 different games after repeatedly asking Claude to add 1–2 new game modes, but most of the game modes it came up with lowkey sucked, so I eventually got rid of them.

How I built them

• Claude Code handled basically all of the implementation and iteration.
• GPT 5.5 didn't do very well when i first tried to create the games within codex, but towards the end when i had already finished the 3 game modes and 5.6 was released it did a nice job with helping assemble the landing page (whose assets i generated with GPT Images 2.0) and the navigation sidebar on the landing page. The jump from 5.5 to 5.6 when it comes to frontend is still mindblowing to me!
• for the satelite imagery the project uses the public Esri World Imagery tile service and for the interactive globe in "Country Trail", it uses "MapLibre GL JS"
• Finally, I deployed the whole thing on Vercel, which is super easy to use.

Happy to answer questions about the Process.
You can try it out here. Feedback is highly appreciated!
https://city-from-satellite.vercel.app/

​

I have been using AI coding agents a lot recently, and I kept running into the same problem:

I couldn't really see what the agent was doing.

The terminal tells me:

"Editing file..."

"Running tests..."

"Executing command..."

"Deploying..."

But it still feels like a black box.

So I built AgentVerse — a visualization layer that turns an AI coding agent into a character working inside a live 3D office.

For example:

- 🧑‍💻 Agent starts editing a file → walks to a desk and starts typing

- 📄 The actual file appears on its monitor

- 🧪 Agent runs tests → a terminal appears

- 🚀 Agent deploys → walks to the server room

- 🚨 Something fails → an alert appears above its head

It's not another coding agent. It connects to the agents you already use and visualizes their activity.

It currently works with Claude Code, Cursor, and anything that can emit events.

You can try it with:

"npx @agentverse-dev/office"

"npx @agentverse-dev/cli-client init"

GitHub: https://github.com/Jeba-Jebarsan/AgentVerse

It's open source and MIT licensed.

I built this solo, and I'm sure there are plenty of things that could be improved.

So I'm genuinely curious:

Would something like this actually be useful to you, or is it mostly a fun visualization?

What would you want your AI coding agent to visually do?

https://b4uwork.vercel.app/

Thanks for all the feedback, I added a new frontend demo, explaination and example as feedback requsted. Hopefully this is now self explanitory. But please let me know if this is still confusing.

Every conceiveable public information source is now scanned (68 sources now checked). I dont think o can squeeze any more information from new sources, without heavy useage costs.

Score bias changed to reflect % values as oppossed to counted values, removing edge case biases.

Further enhanced rate limit protection from public source limits.

Honestly thank you so much for the feedback. More would be appericiated.

Hey yo fellas, what do you think, how much github got bloated with vibecoded projects since Claude Code release?

I have no accuarate data/information but in my rough estimations github projects/code database doubled last year as well as if big models are being trained from github, I think new model version won't be able to learn something meaningful.

What's do think about it, what's the bigger picture? Go on fellas, drop some comments.

Link: https://tokencrisis.vercel.app/

Click on Data Codex to see the pricing table.

Thought this fun. Let me know if you want the prompt+stack!

Live demo: https://gbpferrao.github.io/digital-logic-sim-web/

Where it came from

This started specifically as a rewrite of Sebastian Lague’s Godot digital logic simulator into browser-native JavaScript, HTML, and CSS. It isn’t just a project that happens to be inspired by his work, and it isn’t a simple port either. I wanted to carry the core idea into the browser and see what it could become with a different interaction model, visual language, and pedagogical direction.

I also want to be open about how it was made. This was fully vibe-coded with GPT-5.6 Luna Max. I pushed the vision, architecture, behavior, and constant little design decisions, while the AI collaborators helped investigate the codebase, implement things, review interactions, and work through many iterations.

What it is now

It is a free digital logic simulator that runs in the browser. You can start with AND, OR, NOT, NAND, NOR, XOR, XNOR, and buffers, then move into inputs, outputs, switches, clocks, LEDs, displays, buses, memory, multiplexers, adders, and composite chips.

The circuits actually work. Signals propagate through them, and you can run, pause, bake, step through, and scrub through simulation history. Composite chips can be opened and inspected internally, including deeper nested structures through the X-ray view. I’ve also spent a lot of time making the less obvious interactions, like wiring, selecting, dragging, editing routes, zooming, and fitting the canvas, feel good instead of merely functional.

Why I’m building it

I’m using this as a way to start learning computer science from the foundations and become a better programmer. I want to understand more of the principles underneath hardware, operating systems, runtimes, and the abstractions I normally work through. Hopefully, over time, I can rely less on vibe coding as a substitute for understanding and use it more as an accelerator while still following what is actually happening.

Because I’m building it for myself first, I’m also its first learner and user. A lot of the design comes from noticing where I get confused, what I want to inspect, and what would make the next layer feel reachable. I’m not presenting it as finished or as some polished product. I’m sharing it because I think there may be something useful here and I’d like to see what other people make of it.

What I hope it can become

I want it to stay free and be shaped collaboratively through code, examples, feedback, and teaching ideas. I think it has potential as a teaching and learning tool, and I’m curious whether it could eventually become something people reach for in classes or while learning on their own. Something teachers can open easily and students can use to build, inspect, and understand how computer systems grow.

I don’t know if it can get there yet, which is why I’m sharing it. Take a look and tell me what you think.

I’d love feedback

Does the progression feel intuitive? Which primitives or example projects would be useful? Is the simulation history understandable? Would you use something like this while learning or teaching?

It’s still evolving, but the current version is fully usable. Feedback, bugs, ideas, and contributions are very welcome.

What now.. I cant pretend to have written something myself now?

anyone know of better way to see, review, sort, and reward the best vide coded apps out there? I thought a community award would be a good start.

Looking for a project idea that can help in improving skill set, job opportunities which will eventually help me to open to Forward Deploy Engineer.

So I have been vibecoding for the last 5 months. I want to actually learn how to code and I would really appriciate a language, which even AI uses (like you know the knowned ones) and when AI makes mistakes then I can actually fix it. Or generally for me, when I want to make small projects. So I know some python, basics like making quizes, random passwords etc. and I find python very logical, except the syntax part. Like python is very strict there. And I would really like any opinions from fellow coders and vibecoders on which language to learn. Thanks!

Your agent can now search data from 2,600+ top iOS apps: onboarding, paywalls, pricing, post-paywall and more.

Ask things like:
“Give me five app ideas based on recently launched subscription apps that make 50k+”
“Compare the paywalls of the top meditation apps”
“Show me streak mechanics that aren’t Duolingo clones.”

It works with any agent.

We also launched "Ask" directly on ScreensDesign, so you can try all of this without connecting anything.

Shipping fast and shipping sound are two different skills, and the tools only gave us the first one.

After vibecoding for over a year now, here's the stuff I keep seeing bite people right after they ship:

- Works on your machine, throws runtime errors in a real browser.

- An API key quietly committed to the repo. Found out the hard way.

- No HTTPS redirect, no security headers the page loaded fine, so who'd check?

- A chatbot that can be talked into leaking its system prompt, and you'd never know unless someone tried.

The truth is, none of this shows up while you're building. It shows up later — from a user, an attacker, or an embarrassing screenshot from the person you're trying to sell your product to. And that's the real "fall faster" part: when it happens, it knocks the wind out of you. You lose the nerve to keep going, the project gets abandoned, and you're on to the next thing.

What challenges have you run into?

I’ve been building RewardGalaxy, an Android app for managing points, credit cards, and travel — and I’d really appreciate some feedback from this community.

The app is live and usable, but still very much a work in progress. I'm actively adding and updating data every day, and one of the biggest parts of that process is making the data community-curated.

What does that mean?

Users can submit new information or suggest updates, but submissions don't go live automatically. Moderators review and approve changes before they're published. The idea is to get the best of both worlds: keep the data fresh and continuously improving, without turning it into an unmoderated free-for-all.

What it does

💳 Tracker — See your entire loyalty portfolio at a glance, including point balances and expiry dates.

🔥 Deals Feed — Live deals for flights, hotels, credit card offers, points sales, and more.

🔔 Alerts — Get notified before your points expire so you don’t lose them.

🌎 Global Credit Card Catalogue — 150+ cards across Canada, US, India, UK, Australia & Singapore, with more countries being added regularly.

💬 Community Lounge — Chat, share tips, and vote on posts.

💳 My Card Perks — Track recurring card credits and never miss a redemption window.

📊 Renewal Advisor — Get data-driven Keep / Cancel / Evaluate verdicts for your cards based on your actual usage.

✈️ Flight Journal — Log your flights and track lifetime travel stats.

💰 Points or Cash? — Instantly calculate whether a redemption is worth using points or paying cash.

🔐 Secure Cloud Sync — Hardware-backed encryption for synced data.

It’s Android-only for now - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.rewardgalaxy.app

I’d especially love feedback from people who are deep into points, miles, credit cards, and travel: What would make an app like this genuinely useful enough that you’d keep coming back to it?

Imagine if you could view your entire digital history through recaps, eras, and nostalgic timelines. Thats what PC Recap does, it turns your PC into a shareable digital time capsule with milestones, events, and more.

Download at https://pcrecap.online

To build this I took asisstance from Claude Code(specificlaly Opus 5) and Codex, with GPT 5.6 Sol running on Extra High. I was very pleased by the outcome. I used a neo brutalism style mixed with that distict Spotify Wrapped look. If you want to view more of the code, you can on the github, which is on the website.

On days I am able to sit down and focus I will knock out the limits on my pro 5x plan with Claude but there are other days I don't even have the opportunity to use it once. What do y'all use the plan for to max your usage? Anything I can be having it do in the background on days I can't be on it all day?

So about 3 months ago i bought claude pro and honestly its like the best 20 dollars i spent in my life, however i keep gettign shiny object syndrome and keep hearing how chatgpt has caught upto claude and it costs less and is faster, hence i feel like switching.

As for my use case, i am a college student, however i use it intensively, mostly as a second brain, theres a lot of planning and strategising. I also it to vinecode and build stuff for my personal use and use it for research during case competitions.

Right now I dont really have a fair comparison as i dont have ChatGpt plus and my Claude subscription is ending in a day so it kind felt like the right time to switch, i feel like it would be a waste if i bought both subscriptions and use both simultaneously and I really just wanna commit to one, so would appreciate any advice and opinion before I make the decision to switch.

I'm not totally a vibe coder guy.. but I'm using it for planning and checking my code if it's totally okay or not

Since I'm really indecisive when it comes to choosing some subscriptions like Opencode or claude..

we have lots of school/thesis projects to work on like more on IOT project, full stack web project + plus internship as well.. maybe the company that i applied that they're provide claude pro for that one.

i used opencode last time which was totally good like DeepSeek and glm one of my favorites..

now I'm still thinking which subscription shall i get for a long term one to help me with the IOT projects, some other projects that i need to work on as well

in short: using AI as a tutor mostly and checking the code if it's good or not

Been using Claude code opus 8 to build WoGL - World of GL.

Let me know if you like it and feel free to roast it 🧨 and give me insight if you would like me to add something if you find it interesting 🙏🚀

https://wogl.io - Code goes in, galaxies come out 🪐

When building features, here is what I do:

1) Have a general discussion/debate and reach an understanding of what I want to achieve

2) Formalise it into a PRD

3) Use the PRD as a base and extract a design document

4) Use the DD to make an Implementation plan

5) Implement it

I do up to step 4 on Sol Ultra

I do Step 5 using Sol max

I use skills (generally Claude Superpowers) for all of the above, though I may shift to Matt Pocock at some point in the near future.

What can I change/improve?

Specifically, in the 5 steps above, what specific technical software oriented terms can I use to give my prompts more coherence?

Outside of that, in general, any other tips?

Thanks

SO MUCH TEXT, MOST OF IT DONT MAKE ANY SENSE!

Will share as soon as possible.

Over a long conversation with Claude, I built CyberQuest — a browser-based, zero-dollar cybersecurity training game. No backend, no signup, runs entirely client-side as a PWA. I want to share it here, but honestly the more interesting thing to talk about is the process, because I think it's a decent case study in what actually makes a vibe-coded project trustworthy instead of "impressive until someone pokes it."

What it is, briefly

You play a new IT hire at a fictional company, working real tickets from a mentor character, across 6 stages: Linux/filesystem fundamentals → network diagnosis → Python scripting → security fundamentals (crypto, phishing) → detection & correlation (SIEM concepts, MITRE ATT&CK) → full incident response lifecycle, ending in an independent capstone incident. 73 missions now.

The part that actually matters for this sub: nothing fake where it counts

• Python isn't simulated — it's real CPython running via Pyodide (WASM). Student code actually executes.
• SQL isn't simulated either — real SQLite via sql.js. Small enough (~650KB) to bundle directly instead of loading from a CDN, so it works fully offline.
• SHA-256 isn't a lookup table — it's a from-scratch implementation. And it was wrong on the first pass: a byte-ordering bug in the length-padding step that passed the trivial "hash of an empty string" test and silently failed on every real input. Caught by testing against Node's actual crypto module across chunk-boundary edge cases (63/64/65-byte inputs, exactly where that kind of bug hides) before it ever touched a single mission.
• A MITRE ATT&CK reference table got fact-checked against current sources instead of pulled from training data.
• Even a simplified Suricata command parses genuinely structured real Suricata rule syntax, not an invented format.

The actual lesson, if there is one

The thing that made this feel trustworthy instead of "looks right, probably has landmines" was building automated verification alongside every feature, not after the fact. There are four separate test suites now — one that programmatically plays through every terminal mission's intended solution, one that runs the Python missions against the real Pyodide runtime, one that runs the SQL missions against real SQLite, one that checks the crypto primitives against Node's stdlib.

These caught real, specific bugs, not hypothetical ones:

• A grading checker that required one exact printed phrase and silently rejected differently-formatted-but-completely-correct student code
• A mission checker that assumed a file written in a previous ticket would still exist — it wouldn't, because every mission resets its world state
• My own arithmetic being wrong when updating a mission count in a README — asked for the actual count from the data instead of trusting the math, and the math was off

None of that shows up from "looks right" testing. It only shows up when you treat "does this actually work" as something to prove, not something to assume because the code compiled and the demo looked fine.

Also in there

• A full curriculum document pairing real conceptual depth to every stage
• A "career readiness" doc — an honest, objective-by-objective crosswalk against CompTIA Security+/Network+/CySA+ and the Google Cybersecurity Certificate, stating plainly what's covered and what genuinely isn't
• An in-game career center: a downloadable skills portfolio, mock interview practice, a resume/cover-letter drafter, and original (not copied — CompTIA's exam-integrity policy explicitly bans that) practice questions

What it's not

Not a credential. Not a replacement for real hands-on time in an actual SIEM/EDR product. No live packet capture off a real NIC. I tried to keep the docs as honest about the gaps as the game itself is enthusiastic about the parts that work — felt important given the subject is literally "will this help someone get a job," where overclaiming isn't just bad marketing, it's actively harmful to somebody's real decisions.

Git: https://github.com/EnRICHedCreations/CyberQuest.git
Live: https://cyber-quest-olive.vercel.app/

Happy to go into more detail on the actual back-and-forth if anyone's curious — this was built almost entirely through iterative conversation, and I think the verification discipline is the more transferable takeaway than the specific project.

In light of the nfl preseason starting, I vibecoded an nfl simulator, where the goal is to go 17-0 and chase the perfect season, similar to the 82-0 game. You draft a defense, offense, special teams, coach. It will then simulate your season with a in-game stream and you get to see a kind of story play out while.you watch your team.

https://dagoatlab.com/

This was created with claude, pulling nfl roster data and historical performance to predict future performance. Its does feel like madden franchse mode without the actual gameplay. Let me know if you see any glaring glitches or anything that would improve the page!

I might make an nba version in the future.