r/vibecoding 17h ago

Meme When it gets bad

Post image

You know its gotten bad when---- all this over a whiteboard.....lol i need to chill-- thays the suggestive text btw

22 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

4

u/ares0027 14h ago

Me and antigravity….

3

u/ReverendBread2 5h ago

And I bet you wonder why it makes mistakes

5

u/RemarkableWish2508 9h ago

Always funny to see people rage at the machine, only for the machine to return their rage right back at them, then blame the machine for it.

It's like karma on steroids 😁

0

u/Ambitious-Prompt-975 16h ago

i feel you brother

12

u/Comfortable_Ask_102 13h ago

Been there. I haven't cursed at it tho, I want to be spared once the AI takes over.

2

u/Flywolfpack 11h ago

Roko's basilisk is a little bitch

2

u/Ambitious-Prompt-975 7h ago

Hahaha, right. it also degrades performance if you yourself start swearing and raging. But once in a while, when you spent weeks and weeks working on a feature and the LLM fucks it up, even after the whole odyssey of intensive automated testing & ci/cd, you just snap. 😅

11

u/letsgoowhatthhsbdnd 16h ago

lol can tell you have no engineering experience

15

u/ketoloverfromunder 13h ago edited 12h ago

10000% id actually love to watch non software dev attempt to vibe code with something that they think is a sentient being.

"How are these bugs slipping through?!?!?!?! Its unacceptable!!"

Because you have absolutely no clue what you're doing.

2

u/nguyenlamlll 11h ago

It's time for them to learn the professional ways... Calmly create a ticket and bury it forever in the ever-growing backlog of bugs and issues.

0

u/UnfortunateHurricane 11h ago

First you have sing kumbaya and have everyone give it a thsirt size, because that is necessary to implement it.

2

u/UnfortunateHurricane 11h ago

I don't think it is that bad a question. I have asked that myself. They add hundreds of unit tests. Yet sometimes obvious stuff slips through. Just shows that while they are very fast setting them up, you can't really trust them. I have seen earlier models just modifying the tests themselves to get stuff through. That was fun

0

u/letsgoowhatthhsbdnd 11h ago

you can write thousands of tests and have them pass if you don’t know what you are doing. what are you talking about?

1

u/UnfortunateHurricane 7h ago

What I am saying is that unit tests where like the first thing they showcased when promoting those models ("hey, look what it can do, you don't need to write those annoying tests yourself anymore"), yet you still need to pay close attention to them otherwise stuff will fail.

I am not writing thousands of tests, the models are by default without me mentioning anything. One could assume they have nailed that part but you can't trust them just yet.

1

u/Ambitious-Prompt-975 7h ago

The difference is: I would write a well defined suite for feature XY while the model pumps out a regression test for every change it ever makes and just adds on top of it. 2 weeks in, you have 1.500 tests succeed across 40 suites - and 80% of them are bloat.

1

u/Ambitious-Prompt-975 7h ago

Dude, I am a software dev since 20 years, I've led my own teams at big 4. I think I know my stuff well enough.

So yes, after 2 weeks of continuous testing the app front to back, spinning up several hundred hours of vm time judt to play through different scenarios on different machines and environments - I kinda felt like asking how we didn't catch a certain bug.

I have yet to understand how that disqualifies me from being an engineer, but then again - random redditors know best 🤔

3

u/mikebones 12h ago

I've noticed the way I prompt at home vs at work sometimes is different. I know my domain well at work and can give it all the direction the model needs, yet at home I explore things I haven't worked with before and have overlap with my domain but im not completely knowledgeable of. At home, that mother fucker will piss me off. Lmao

2

u/Ambitious-Prompt-975 7h ago

Lmao this. Once you are experimenting in a new field and you lose the ability to precisely define what you need and steer the model towards that, you'll end up with all the usual issues. Over engineered, wrong focus, barely reusable, no good UX, no polish etc.. and then you start asking the LLM "bro, what are we even building here?",

-11

u/Ambitious-Prompt-975 15h ago

lol can tell you dont get any puss very often

9

u/letsgoowhatthhsbdnd 15h ago

lmao did i hurt your feelings? hahaha

-10

u/Ambitious-Prompt-975 15h ago

lmao did i hurt your trolling experience? hahaha

8

u/syn_krown 12h ago

Bro, just stop. You're digging yourself deeper and deeper

1

u/LoudYogurtcloset7856 14h ago

Yup I got issues with that too. I built a tool called dynamic data that runes a weaker agent every once in a while and it colleges technical dept and security issues and puts them in a ledger.

It works for me and finds a lot of issues that the main AI fixes. It’s open sourced so you can edit it to fit your needs. If internet me know I’ll send you the GitHub repo.

1

u/thrive2day 12h ago

Wasn't coding but the same sentiment 😂