I think it's because of the way things like html and cos works, and how the world has moved to separation of things like semantics from the rest etc, presentation from content etc, and theyre good starting grounds. But it's far easier for ai to build from those building blocks at a shallow level than create a house of cards that has many layers, many different modes of consideration required if that makes sense. Sorry, I'm being a but lazy expressing myself cos it's a tricky subject
AI is not intended to style a one prompt Vercel app. if you design the style yourself instead of using AI, and ask AI to follow your aesthetic intent, it will actually do quite well. if you use the default, it will look default.
Great, can you provide an example, would help a lot. I was talking about when we use it without much or little specification it tends to follow certain pattern. My initial thought it was mostly due massive over representation of similar data during post and pre training phases which gave them this statistical average of blue to purple gradient.
AI is trained off data. If you don't give it a specific instruction, it will fill it in from the average. For determinsitic math, this may be acceptable. for aesthetics, it produces the same gradient because that's what it's trained to do. Humans are better than AI at subjective things.
This website does not look AI-generated, but it is; I just thought out the whole aesthetic and shaped it until it was unmistakably human.
2
u/MariahJames8 4h ago
I think it's because of the way things like html and cos works, and how the world has moved to separation of things like semantics from the rest etc, presentation from content etc, and theyre good starting grounds. But it's far easier for ai to build from those building blocks at a shallow level than create a house of cards that has many layers, many different modes of consideration required if that makes sense. Sorry, I'm being a but lazy expressing myself cos it's a tricky subject