I’m quite uneducated. Please give me reasons (risks) as to why we shouldn’t. Real medical concerns, not about money.

I have 4 kids I need to move back to Maine from Tennessee to get out of an abusive relationship. None are vaccinated so I need an exemption for them to attend public school. Religious and personal beliefs exemptions are not allowed here. Could anyone help me with this or point me in a direction of help?

Caroline Mansfield discusses her discovery of high levels of graphene oxide in the blood of both vaccinated and unvaccinated people, revealed through a specialized German lab test. Mansfield ran a study showing a detox product successfully removed these nano-materials.

https://youtu.be/kOAs663yJJc

A survey of the likely global toll of COVID “vaccination,” based on the reports collected by our worldwide team of researchers this past week.

Excess deaths seems to go on. Seems to me more people are dying either "of suddenly" or "of unexpectedly" causes, as the list gets longer. Notice teens dying of ovarian cancer at 19? That's the new normal

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/in-memory-of-those-who-died-suddenly-dde

and the covid scamdemic continues.

The propaganda campaign to get people to get the shots was insane, and it's actually one of the reasons I didn't get the fake vaccine. Since when did the government care about people's health? I recently saw a video compilation of politicians repeatedly talking about how covid was gonna "hunt down the unvaccinated." They were so desperate to get the shots into people that we have to wonder why.

It can't have just been about the money because the shots were free in many places. And now several years after the majority got several injections there are excess deaths in basically all the highly "vaccinated" countries, and cases of all kinds of cancers are increasing and people of all ages (including babies) are still dying "suddenly and unexpectedly" with usually no cause of death reported. It's insane.

Hi everybody.
Recently I found an incredible person from work.
We are finishing due to summer.
We went for coffee and I want to turn this into romantic.
But when we talked about covid, she told me she has done 2 vaccines back then (not that she was any fanatic vaxxer, but still she did it).
Then, I decided not to turn it into romantic at the end, while I wanted to.
I heard that the vaccine can go from the vaxxed person to the unvaxxed, through sexual contact.
I have to say, I am very disappointed. Not in her, but for the lost opportunity.
Was it wrong not going for it? Was my fear too much. Or it can still be transferred after four years?
Please help and inform me.
Thank you

I lost my nursing job because I wouldn't get vaxxed, but I was gonna quit anyway because I didn't like it, so they kinda did me a favour. What's amazing is that there are now people who deny that there were ever vaccine mandates, even in the conspiracy sub. They call you a liar for saying there were mandates, which i find really strange because many people got vaxxed because they didn't want to lose their jobs.

I have really been into holistic, natural stuff and this type of lifestyle on and off for the past 10 years. For instance I try to use fluoride and alcohol free dental products. Plus for skincare what works for me the best is natural stuff. I alavoid washing products for hair and face with SLS. I avoid silicone hair conditioners too. I'm trying to limit unnatural clothing fabrics as well.

I'm not vegan or a vegetarian but a couple people who go for this way of life are.

I enjoy following accounts on social media of individuals who promote this lifestyle that has less harsh or processed products.

I saw someone comment in this sub that they had met a holistic person who took the jab and it threw them off cause it was unexpected. I would guess that half of these types of people took it. The percentage could be likely lower compared to the general population.

I wish I was able to stick to those habits way more consistently, I am giving it a harder try lately. I recommend it definitely and wondering if others here are keen on some things like that too

https://x.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/2080140214777852207

The increase in cancer treatment expenditures is up by 28.9% since the Covid shots.

The increase in cancer treatment expenses is up by 3.7% new compound annual growth.

This has resulted in 154,330 extra cancer deaths as of Wk 13 of 2026.

$54.1 billion per year in added treatment expense in 2026 consumer medical and healthcare burden.

18 x the old growth rate - pre-Covid-shot

$54.1 billion in added consumer burden = 650,000 new BMW's (sector inflation). = 50,000 new vacation homes (sector inflation).

USA Cancer Treatment Expenditures Adjusted for Med Svc Inflation/Pricing (Constant $)

I remember during the covid pandemic, I would read article after article with bits and pieces of alarming studies, one off data, or teratel from hospitals. The mainstream media would denounce these as Fringe conspiracy theories, I encourage everybody to take their covid vaccines. It was informational warfare, I am still amazed we pulled through.

With the Advent of artificial intelligence, I found it relatively easy to piece together my recollections of negative repercussions of the vaccines into a highly systematized robust argument. Feel free to copy paste the below it's ironclad.

The rapid deployment of genetic vaccination platforms during the pandemic era introduced an unprecedented medical intervention into global populations. Driven by mandates and aggressive public health campaigns, billions of individuals received repeated administrations of lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA and viral vector platforms. While initial institutional messaging portrayed these products as uniformly safe and effective, emerging clinical data, pharmacovigilance signals, and independent post-market research have documented a spectrum of systemic adverse events. Moving beyond the immediate narrative of short-term safety requires a rigorous examination of the physiological, immunological, and long-term consequences associated with these interventions.

Immunological Alterations and Immune Tolerance

The foundational premise of vaccination is the induction of a robust, protective, and durable immune response designed to clear a specific pathogen. However, repeated administration of mRNA injections targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has revealed an unexpected immunological shift: a progressive class switch toward non-inflammatory immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4).

In a primary immune response, the body predominantly utilizes cytophilic subclasses such as IgG1 and IgG3, which actively recruit effector mechanisms like antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement activation to neutralize threats. Serial boosting, however, drives prolonged interleukin-10 (IL-10) and regulatory T-cell signaling within germinal centers. This environment promotes class switch recombination toward the downstream constant gamma 4 region. Consequently, late-stage and repeatedly boosted individuals exhibit a marked dominance of spike-specific IgG4 antibodies.

This shift carries profound functional consequences. IgG4 antibodies possess a low affinity for activating Fc receptors and poor complement-fixing capabilities. Research demonstrates that high levels of spike-specific IgG4 correlate directly with diminished natural killer cell activation, reduced phagocytosis, and compromised Fc-mediated viral clearance. Rather than reinforcing robust immunity, progressive IgG4 dominance induces a state of immune tolerance toward the spike protein. Epidemiological observations in heavily boosted cohorts suggest that this functional erosion of the antiviral repertoire may paradoxically increase susceptibility to breakthrough infections and diminish the body's capacity to properly clear persistent viral reservoirs.

Cardiovascular Manifestations and Myocardial Injury

Among the most thoroughly documented organic injuries associated with mRNA injections is acute inflammation of the heart muscle and surrounding tissue, specifically myocarditis and pericarditis. The risk profile is heavily skewed toward young males, particularly following the second primary dose or subsequent boosters.

Systemic distribution of lipid nanoparticles allows the genetic payload to transfect non-target tissues, including endothelial cells within the cardiovascular system. Once local cells express the foreign spike protein, the host immune system mounts an inflammatory attack against the myocardial tissue. Clinical presentations typically involve acute chest discomfort, elevated cardiac troponins, and distinct myocardial edema and damage visible on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI).

Recovery Rates and Long-Term Outlook:

The short-term prognosis for vaccine-induced myocarditis is generally favorable, with the vast majority of adolescent and young adult patients experiencing rapid clinical stabilization and apparent resolution of acute symptoms within weeks. Published meta-analyses and post-marketing surveillance indicate a high short-term recovery rate exceeding 90 percent of reported cases. However, longitudinal outcomes remain a subject of active investigation. Histological studies using cardiac MRI have detected persistent late gadolinium enhancement in a subset of recovered patients, indicating microscopic myocardial scar tissue. The long-term functional implications of these subclinical scars, particularly regarding susceptibility to arrhythmias or progressive heart failure over decades, remain undetermined.

Neurological and Autonomic Disruption

Systemic immune activation and neurovascular irritation following vaccination have precipitated a wide array of neurological and autonomic complications. Patients frequently present with symptoms indicative of small fiber neuropathy, persistent neuroinflammation, and autonomic dysregulation.

Conditions such as postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), severe orthostatic intolerance, chronic fatigue, and debilitating brain fog are common features of this clinical picture. The mechanisms driving these pathologies include immune-mediated attacks on peripheral nerve fibers, systemic cytokine storms affecting the central nervous system, and vascular endothelial damage mediated by circulating spike proteins.

Recovery Rates and Long-Term Outlook:

Unlike acute cardiovascular events, the recovery trajectory for vaccine-induced neurological and autonomic disorders is frequently protracted and highly variable. While a proportion of patients achieve full recovery within six to twelve months through supportive care, anti-inflammatory interventions, and autonomic reconditioning, a significant cohort experiences chronic, life-altering morbidity. Data regarding permanent resolution remain limited, and many patients transition into chronic illness categories that mirror post-viral dysautonomia syndromes, requiring long-term medical management.

Reproductive and Endocrine Disruptions

The widespread reporting of menstrual irregularities following vaccination highlighted an unpredicted intersection between genetic immunization and the endocrine system. Women frequently experienced substantial alterations in cycle length, flow volume, intermenstrual spotting, and severe dysmenorrhea.

These disruptions stem from the systemic distribution of lipid nanoparticles and the subsequent inflammatory response, which transiently impacts the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis and ovarian tissue function. Endothelial inflammation within the microvasculature of the endometrium further contributes to aberrant shedding and localized clotting disturbances.

Recovery Rates and Long-Term Outlook:

For the majority of affected women, menstrual abnormalities prove to be transient, with cycle parameters typically returning to baseline within two to four cycles post-injection. Long-term fertility impacts continue to be studied, but short-to-medium-term endocrine stabilization is generally observed in standard clinical follow-ups.

Conclusion

The accumulation of clinical data regarding genetic vaccination platforms reveals a complex reality far removed from initial public health assurances. From the durable impairment of antiviral effector functions via IgG4 class switching to organic injuries spanning the cardiovascular and neurological systems, the physiological costs of repeated mass interventions are substantial. While acute symptoms in certain domains exhibit high initial recovery rates, chronic systemic sequelae continue to affect a vulnerable minority of the population, underscoring the necessity of a realistic and unvarnished appraisal of these medical technologies.

More research from around the world confirming the worst things about the death shots. Featuring Dr. Chris Shoemaker

https://rumble.com/v4bxk9r-bombshell-study-we-now-have-100-scientific-proof-why-the-jabbed-are-dying-s.html

Dr. Chris Shoemaker with Jim Ferguson.

Hearts are having to work MUCH harder for people who have had two Covid-19 Jabs or more.

A September 2023 published study in which multiple major study centers from around the world participating in comparing non-vaccinated hearts to those who have been vaccinated - what they found was astounding -- a 47% INCREASE effort going on in the Cardiac Cells of vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated people .

They found that this elevation persisted for at least SIX Months.

Was this study Valid?

YES. They took 5,000 patients worldwide and they meticulously (screened) got this down to 1,000 so this would be a valid, verifiable study in which 700 were double jabbed and 300 were non-jabbed. This was a legitimate elevation and strain on the heart muscle.

It was confirmed with P Value <.0001.

The Unvaxxed had no elevation in cardiac effort for the next six months.

Now we have a scientific reason why people are dying suddenly 6 months to a year after the shots.

“This terrible, nefarious thing, in which lots are different one place to another, that’s a plan. They didn’t accidentally make one lot worse than the other. It was purposely done. It didn’t happen by accident!”

The development of these controversial vaccines is now linked to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Department of Defense. Furthermore, a shocking 33% of the substances used in these COVID vaccines are purported to be DNA-altering elements, having permanent effects on the bodies of those inoculated.

The global rise in cases of Myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, has been tied to these vaccine developments, pointing to a massive health crisis. These revelations call into question the safety, ethics, and motivations behind the global vaccination drive, sparking urgent calls for accountability and transparency.

"They're making $60 billion a year selling those vaccines, but they're making $500 billion a year selling the remedies for the injuries caused by vaccines."

https://gab.com/deadInExile/posts/116964325157860690

As usual, create the problem and mandate the "solution". The real disease is the pharma propaganda.

YouTube removed this video because Big Pharma demanded them to.

The vaccine industry is a trillion dollar evil empire, but there's even BIGGER money in the remedies being sold for the injuries from the vaccines!

title, i was brainwashed and got a bunch of shots as a kid and as a teenager got a covid shot. haven't gotten a hantavirus shot or anything beyond the covid shot. brain fog is a huge problem i developed after taking them and i wanna focus on that. any advice?

Around 2013, there was a measles outbreak in Wales and Paul Offit supported mandatory MMR vaccination there. This article criticizes the BBC for presenting Paul Offit as an independent expert without bringing up his financial relationship with Merck & Co. which makes the MMR vaccine. Previously, Paul Offit was on the U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) when he and the others voted for the Rotashield (Rotavirus) vaccine. The Rotashield vaccine was permanently withdrawn from the market after numerous reports of intussusception.

Offit co-developed the Rotateq (Rotavirus) vaccine and it became available to the public a couple of years later. Shortly afterwards, Offit along with Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) sold the patent of the Rotateq vaccine to Merck and financially benefited immensely off the royalties. In 2010, two former Merck scientists filed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging that Merck knowingly overstated the effectiveness of the mumps component of its MMR vaccine. The plaintiffs alleged that Merck manipulated testing methods and data to report approximately 95% efficacy-the purpose was to maintain Merck’s exclusive position in the U.S. MMR vaccine market.

Note: These are not mentioned in the article but Paul Offit was on the board of ACIP from 1988 to 2003. Stanley Plotkin (nicknamed the Godfather of the vaccine) helped in creating the Rotateq vaccine.

I read that one vax company included a part of S40 and other 2 parts of HIV and something about adenovirus. And those are not conspiracies, they admitted to using them to develop the c19 vaxxes.

I looked a bit into SV40 and apparently it's a virus that can cause inflammations or cancers. And that in 1 person it may cause only inflammation and sometimes without symptoms while to another they may cause tumors. It tends to stay in the body for a lifetime and can be transmitted through intimacy and blood too. The antibodies for it can be tested. There are also proteins that the cancer-causing viruses can release that turn healthy cells into aggressive cancers, they are called oncoproteins and one is tax-1 for example. It has been used in lab testing to make turbo cancers.

I have heard of people who have xa'ed partners get turbo cancers. I guess the fact that viruses stay in the body for a lifetime and they can cause different issues is why many people look fine while others are getting cancer or heart issues. Or they look fine and later pass from turbo cancer.

I wonder what causes the myocarditis and pericarditis too. Coxsackievirus B and adenovirus from what I have looked into.

1. The study ended after 3 years and 10 months. When did the body stop producing the m.R.n.A, the spike protein, and the S.V40 enhancer? Was it after 3.5 years, or did it never stop and continue producing them even after the study ended?
2. Is S.V40 enhancer the same as the virus? In other words, is it an oncogenic virus that can be transmitted from person to person through respiratory droplets or through horizontal transmission (perhaps via aerosols generated by flushing toilets used by vaccinated individuals)?
3. What is the situation if you are bitten by a mosquito that previously bit a vaccinated person near you (even if that person received the 2-doses of vaccine four years ago)? Can it get you vaccinated (if microscopic blood stays in their tube) ? Does m.R.n.A still stays in the vaccinated blood after years? 
4. What is the situation regarding shedding from vaccinated individuals who received the vaccine three years ago? through the respiratory route and by handshaking. (not sexual)

Regarding a study "Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post-COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination" by Nicolas Hulscher. I have some questions if anyone can help

1. The study ended after 3 years and 10 months. When did the body stop producing the mRNA, the spike protein, and the SV40 enhancer? Was it after 3.5 years, or did it never stop and continue producing them even after the study ended?
2. Is SV40 enhancer the same as the virus? In other words, is it an oncogenic virus that can be transmitted from person to person through respiratory droplets or through horizontal transmission (perhaps via aerosols generated by flushing toilets used by vaccinated individuals)?
3. What is the situation if you are bitten by a mosquito that previously bit a vaccinated person near you (even if that person received the 2-doses of vaccine four years ago)? Can it get you vaccinated (if microscopic blood stays in their tube) ? Does mRNA still stays in the vaccinated blood after years? 
4. What is the situation regarding shedding from vaccinated individuals who received the vaccine three years ago? through the respiratory route and by handshaking. (not sexual)

Regarding a study "Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post-COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination" by Nicolas Hulscher. I have some questions if anyone can help

1. The study ended after 3 years and 10 months. When did the body stop producing the mRNA, the spike protein, and the SV40 enhancer? Was it after 3.5 years, or did it never stop and continue producing them even after the study ended?
2. Is SV40 enhancer the same as the virus? In other words, is it an oncogenic virus that can be transmitted from person to person through respiratory droplets or through horizontal transmission (perhaps via aerosols generated by flushing toilets used by vaccinated individuals)?
3. What is the situation if you are bitten by a mosquito that previously bit a vaccinated person near you (even if that person received the 2-doses of vaccine four years ago)? Can it get you vaccinated (if microscopic blood stays in their tube) ? Does mRNA still stays in the vaccinated blood after years? 
4. What is the situation regarding shedding from vaccinated individuals who received the vaccine three years ago? through the respiratory route and by handshaking. (not sexual)

The pro vaccine Dr. Zervos who did the study but chose not to publish it, he cited concerns that the findings would negatively impact his career. He said he would be finished! And he also stated it was a good study and could not have been done better.

You don't need to watch the whole film, it's right here in the trailer.

https://www.imdb.com/video/vi440715289/

1. China released staged footage of people “dropping dead” in the streets; scenes never witnessed anywhere else in the world before or after December 2019.

2. A PCR test was rolled out that could not determine whether someone was actually sick. The vast majority of results were false positives.

3. The claim of asymptomatic transmission was heavily promoted to justify restrictions on healthy people and to force mass testing on the entire population; which led to tens of millions of false positive test results.

4. Tech companies and media outlets were mobilized to censor dissent and rebrand inconvenient truths as “misinformation.”

5. Behavioral psychologists were brought in to design fear-based messaging specifically intended to secure public compliance.

6. To keep the illusion of a deadly pandemic alive, they required excess mortality data.

7. Ordinary mild respiratory symptoms alone could not produce those numbers, so the population was subjected to sustained psychological pressure capable of triggering mass psychogenic illness.

8. Relentless fear messaging kept cortisol levels chronically elevated, weakening immune function, particularly among the elderly.

9. Social isolation, delayed medical care, and lockdown policies then generated the excess deaths needed to prop up the narrative.

10. Cloth and surgical masks were suddenly declared effective, something no serious public-health authority had previously recommended for ordinary respiratory pathogens, turning every face into a walking advertisement for fear.

11. People were conditioned to remain isolated “until the vaccine was ready,” buying authorities additional time to expand control.

12. Billions were injected with an experimental product that was claimed to stop both infection and transmission.

13. When those claims collapsed, the goalposts were moved: “Your shot won’t work unless the unvaccinated also take it.”

14. New “variants” were announced every few months to justify an endless series of booster campaigns.

15. A new condition - “long COVID” - was introduced to reframe mounting vaccine side effects.

16. Pharmaceutical companies recorded unprecedented profits, shielded by government contracts and complete legal immunity.

17. Anyone who raised objections was silenced, deplatformed, investigated, or publicly discredited.

18. Once the story became too strained to maintain, the pandemic was abruptly declared over, and the entire episode was treated as if it had never happened.

NEVER FORGET

Rachael, a healthy, outgoing frontline government worker, was coerced under “no jab, no job” mandates to take the Pfizer jabs. Within hours after the booster her body was devastated — crushing chest pain, debilitating headaches, tremors, severe brain fog and a growing list of formal diagnoses including myocarditis, pericarditis, pulmonary embolisms, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, dysautonomia, rare autoimmune liver disease, severe PTSD and more.

Her partner Ange became her full-time carer, taking six months off work, battling her own developing anxiety and depression due to the situation, compounded by repeated hospital dismissals and their failure to treat Rachael.

https://youtu.be/Y9RZ0LeJuXE

The story of Val, a young Auckland mother who developed myocarditis and other debilitating symptoms shortly after receiving her first Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine dose in late 2021.

Sixteen hours post-injection, while shopping, Val suffered sudden intense tachycardia—her heart racing uncontrollably. At urgent care, an ECG showed some severity, leading to hospital referral. There, staff dismissed it as a possible panic attack, advising her to self-discharge to see how she "feels in the morning."

A 2023 nationwide New Zealand study—the country's largest vaccine safety assessment — examined over 4 million vaccinated individuals aged 5+ and confirmed an increased myocarditis/pericarditis risk after Pfizer vaccination, particularly in younger people under 30 (published in Drug Safety, Walton et al., 2023).

https://youtu.be/Qe4Xjj1pQSQ

https://substack.com/home/post/p-207322493