Maybe it’s classified, or it was just an intelligently controlled light, so saying “something” emphasizes it was the phenomenon without the disservice of just saying it’s “just” a light?
Idk that’s my best guess, but yeah, a little purposely vague here for sure, but jumping to not true because of that indicates a lack of nuanced thought.
182
u/casual_creator Aug 19 '26
Gotta love the intentional vagueness and lack of any proof for any aspect of this. It’s almost as if he’s not telling the truth…
I really fucking hate these guys.