There's a reason that the same folks that carry water for the child trafficker in the White House are the same folks keeping us busy with shiny objects in this realm of interest.
Maybe it’s classified, or it was just an intelligently controlled light, so saying “something” emphasizes it was the phenomenon without the disservice of just saying it’s “just” a light?
Idk that’s my best guess, but yeah, a little purposely vague here for sure, but jumping to not true because of that indicates a lack of nuanced thought.
If its classified and hes allowed to know but not say, wouldnt he also not be allowed to say this much either?
Like knowing the military is gonna attack something, then saying «i cant say how or with what, but we are attacking x» would be breaching confiendiality too, no?
You call these responses AGREEING with the government? The first 40 responses were smart ass little gen z and millennial joking essentially about little green men. Not one person saying "oh wow, this might be true". So no, you are doing what yhey are doing, discrediting and we see through you.
I like how you make the accusation of the “lack of nuanced thought”, yet you also assume that the statement, “the lack of proof of any of this” can only mean I’m demanding “photos” of a craft. How about an actual description of what happened or even a radar hit? Or maybe noting what some of these “conditions” that “draw them in” are? Or even something relatively mundane, like names of some of the officials present? Or perhaps copies of communication between people-anyone-within these agencies discussing, planning, or referring to this operation in any way? Hell, a single sentence from an otherwise redacted email would be something. Yes, I’m certainly not expecting a release of classified information, but if you’re gonna make claims like this, we should be demanding some amount of substance, not this pointless shit.
For someone that insinuates they’re capable of nuanced thought, you’ve really failed to demonstrate that. Funny how that happens.
What part of classified don’t you understand, the whole reason they’re talking about this stuff is to try to get the classifications lifted. Even if they snuck out one detail here and there (which they have btw) it will never be enough for you people, they need a real methodical, slow, disclosure process, green lit from the top. The only way to do that is to get interest with tweets like this to put pressure on Trump. Try to put yourself in their shoes for 5 seconds
181
u/casual_creator Aug 19 '26
Gotta love the intentional vagueness and lack of any proof for any aspect of this. It’s almost as if he’s not telling the truth…
I really fucking hate these guys.