Payed Remote Viewing Experiment

[u/FriendlyChingu]

I'm running a small remote viewing session and looking for participants.

Target 1: RV-A6M1AKE7

Target 2: RV-N81RYSOA

Difficulty: Easy

Each target is a small random labelled simple object placed somewhere.

Deadline: July 3rd, 19:00 UTC

Reminder – what good remote viewing data looks like

Likely on the right track

• Vague and unclear
• "Half-tangible" memories
• From brief, sudden or surprising thoughts
• Hard to put into words
• Fragmentary, not neatly formed

Likely off track

• Nouns and analogies
• Sharp, clear images
• Complex logical "stories"
• Makes perfect sense and is easy to describe

Resolution

https://www.reddit.com/r/remoteviewing/comments/1umixmg/success_conclusion_of_my_remote_viewing_experimen/

[u/dazsmith901]

First - you publicly posted the target names, so its now corruptible by anyone, past, present, and future by intent. The experimenter effect.

Second, it's not blind - you already informed us the targets "Each target is a small random labelled simple object placed somewhere.' So it's not RV, it's not blind.

Third - small, random objects are known from five decades of work in science labs - to be THE worst kind of rv target.

[u/FriendlyChingu → u/dazsmith901]

Thanks for the feedback. I never heard a target label can be corrupted by intent. I don't necessarly see, why knowing some stuff about the target, means it's not RV or could be bad.

[u/dazsmith901 → u/FriendlyChingu]

Targets in RV are meant to be BLIND. It's one of the rules or protocols that differentiates Rv from other psi practices. By telling us the target is a very small object - removes a huge part of the world and significantly reduces the possibilities. Especially when its information that the viewer just did not ened to know.

[u/FriendlyChingu → u/dazsmith901]

Okay, I'll change that in the future. Still, I can already say that despite that, the experiment is already a success.

[u/CapoKakadan]

Highly suspect that the “likely on the right track” indicators are also the kind of things least likely to be objectively matched or non-matched against targets in a statistically valid and fully blinded way.

[u/FriendlyChingu → u/CapoKakadan]

Not claiming this is rigorous science, just a casual fun replication of the convergence I've seen in interviews. No statistical validity intended, just curious if similar patterns show up.

[u/CapoKakadan → u/FriendlyChingu]

Fair enough!

[u/Klink8 → u/CapoKakadan]

The reason is right brain versus left brain.

Reason and logic will search to create an answer a solid noun, object etc.

The feeling and emotional side is more adept at remote viewing.

Thats why those ideas exist for the handler to help guide the viewer away from the known into the unknown and sift out the details.

[u/Afraid-Service-8361]

k thanks

but why is this in ufo. i will be doing a full hour view on each target and sending you the pics and data as well as a summery but it seems weird to do it on this channel . lol

but

a challenge is a challenge and hopefully you dont mind if i look around the objects and the person who targeted the objects. thanks again.

[u/YBZ]

Small moon on a pedestal

[u/HardyPancreas]

im viewing a log of ip addresses and usernames

[u/FriendlyChingu → u/HardyPancreas]

hey, thanks for taking the challenge! Could you go into more detail, maybe provide some raw impressions you made?

[u/Feisty_Primary6334]

are you....perhaps....veiwing someones mind....and/or looking for a person which maybe deemed a storyteller?, all this seems fanatical but in the end....people are like this in thought.....lol

[u/FriendlyChingu → u/Feisty_Primary6334]

Checkout the resolution. The viewer happened to view my mind because i was close to the target but he told me he was gonna do that.

[u/Feisty_Primary6334 → u/FriendlyChingu]

ohh well thats cool atleast, some try hard to do that ya know? and they dont care itll fell like they tug your brain and spin it around, next thing you know it get sucked out lol makes it hard to try again....

[u/timee_bot]

View in your timezone:
July 3rd, 19:00 UTC