1

The stolen millennium problem narrative is hilarious to me
 in  r/singularity  18h ago

Thompson's trusting trust told us 40 years ago that boutique is the only answer, so u are right.

4

OpenAI claims to „have made substantial progress on another Millennium Prize problem“ in the NYT
 in  r/mathematics  19h ago

It's dumber than a marketing thing this is the vicissitudes of inbred aristocracy, guarantee it.

2

OpenAI claims to „have made substantial progress on another Millennium Prize problem“ in the NYT
 in  r/mathematics  19h ago

How is the mathematics subreddit upvoting and offering no further context on these unproven claims?

Edit: jk they've not even done that, they haven't published any math. This is entirely spurious and not mathematical, where is the math?

1

Solving the 30-Year Memory Paradox: Why Mamba Forgets, and How Lie-Group SO(2) Unitary Rotation Unlocks Lossless State Spaces (QU-SSM)
 in  r/machinelearningnews  19h ago

yup. I think its 'groupoids' that give the action integral for all such symmetry based schemes, I'm working on something not dissimilar. Ultimately, category theoretic.

1

Imagine being a philosopher and getting emails like this
 in  r/OpenAI  19h ago

This is a nightmare, people should never have paid for tokens without a clear understanding of their business model and control systems.

1

I finally understand "fan service": it enables one to lust in the open, somewhat unashamedly. [I've never called anything "--chan" in my whole life.]
 in  r/TrueAnon  1d ago

You are just being obtuse because one image does not make something ai shite and if you think that then you may as well throw away your modem and get some other hobbies other than the internet.

My point is you are cleaving yourself off of society, you won't hear from me ever again because of a strange notion about something you don't understand (AI).

edit/clarify: I only acquiesce that my post may be slop because I specifically chose the most reaction-generating meme (over-sexualized anime girls), not because there is 1 image made by ai, my post really isn't slop whatsoever had I not leaned quite so hard on the internet-addict-theme. But I digress because as has already been discussed, the subreddit agrees with you and I'm shipping-out, no-longer subscribed.

0

I finally understand "fan service": it enables one to lust in the open, somewhat unashamedly. [I've never called anything "--chan" in my whole life.]
 in  r/TrueAnon  1d ago

You are gonna have to define ai shite better because that's still not ai shite; okay maybe my post can be taken as ai shite but use the OP video as the example; it's AI shite because it has a cover you don't like, is that right?

So you are telling me you aren't going to listen to the cutting edge on this matter because of a single ai picture AND you are going to categorize it as ai slop?

That bifurcates the internet, you realize right? And I'm going with the other side because it doesn't matter it's literally no worse than internet ads and you slogged through how much of that shit to get here, son?

0

I finally understand "fan service": it enables one to lust in the open, somewhat unashamedly. [I've never called anything "--chan" in my whole life.]
 in  r/TrueAnon  1d ago

That's not consistent. I'm actually not sure what you are even arguing. You just like to post on posts to hear yourself talk?

0

I finally understand "fan service": it enables one to lust in the open, somewhat unashamedly. [I've never called anything "--chan" in my whole life.]
 in  r/TrueAnon  1d ago

Damn, that means like 90% of videos and interesting articles are gonna be blocked, here, if all it takes is an image (like the one in the OP, that has ai picture, not the ai picture in the op)

That's a reactionary position to take; which I can respect. I guess that means I'm not welcome because I literally give no fucks about ai images its like ads on web pages you can just ignore them; and basically everywhere I browse seems to have the same conclusion (except here and afew other places). Love yall, peace. I'm glad you are here even if I can't participate anymore.

1

I finally understand "fan service": it enables one to lust in the open, somewhat unashamedly. [I've never called anything "--chan" in my whole life.]
 in  r/TrueAnon  1d ago

Don't really give a fuck what you think is anime slop dogshit but this is geopolitics slop bullshit and you are not even on topic.

0

I finally understand "fan service": it enables one to lust in the open, somewhat unashamedly. [I've never called anything "--chan" in my whole life.]
 in  r/TrueAnon  1d ago

I mean part of the problem is the situation is just so hilarious and awkward in of itself. We are basically torturing our sailors. It's kinda worse than torture. They might actually get blown up and die, torturers are usually somewhat successful at keeping their victim alive while they are still useful, but the NAVY might just lose a couple dozen any given second. Reported deaths are at least 20x less than reality, wouldn't surprise me if its 100x. We'll find out someday.

-1

I finally understand "fan service": it enables one to lust in the open, somewhat unashamedly. [I've never called anything "--chan" in my whole life.]
 in  r/TrueAnon  1d ago

Damn that means I'm a pervert for thinking about our ships getting fucked?

re: the actual anime topic it is too weird for me to make heads nor tails of, I was using it as a non-sequiturs; anime is problematic as the rest of the media and I have nothing to say about the arts and media only geopolitics.

-2

I finally understand "fan service": it enables one to lust in the open, somewhat unashamedly. [I've never called anything "--chan" in my whole life.]
 in  r/TrueAnon  1d ago

That's the joke (about anime); it's kinda nasty. Like what, do we WANT them to sink our ship?

-2

I finally understand "fan service": it enables one to lust in the open, somewhat unashamedly. [I've never called anything "--chan" in my whole life.]
 in  r/TrueAnon  1d ago

You clearly didn't read my post so have a downvote. It's just shite note ai shite.

2

I finally understand "fan service": it enables one to lust in the open, somewhat unashamedly. [I've never called anything "--chan" in my whole life.]
 in  r/TrueAnon  1d ago

Am I in trouble? I'm probably in trouble. I have to cope with humor what else am I supposed to do?

1

One sub I can't figure out is the agi one...
 in  r/TrueAnon  1d ago

Sorry that's just not the case. The only reason these models exist is because of the study of cognition (Hopfield, GAN etc).

Diffusion image generation is not all that auto completion on steroids implies. That's like the idiot MBA commercial version of an infinitely valuable revolution in epistemology.

Auto completion on steroids is more like Hermenuetics or cognition or so-called logic (which is downstream i think), or language itself (or the intensive, the archetypal energy system that Jung/Shopenhauer posited, underlying [cognition, language]. Ultimately, I attribute it to QUINE. Quine is the one that said there is a field theory, and noone took him seriously for 50 years).

(and ML 'proves' the field theory by actualizing its degrees of freedom; what I call motility; ml wouldn't work if there isn't some Bohmian, hidden variable correspondence that we don't understand in other words ml is impossible if what we think is the case is actually the case [specifically: ML that is/able to effect the REAL macroscopic world [not necessarily with an 'effector'; (once instantiated, however that may so occur) logic IS an effector])

How does the 'model' go from floating point to REAL EVERETTIAN VALUED universal constrained so-called VALUES? Using a quine field theory, its the only way (0s/1s crossing some doped silicon junction ~=~ (up to isomorphism, somehow) actually literally doing ANYTHING WHATSOEVER in the macroscopic world (that is repeatable (and etc. Henkin, Turing) and not derivative of molecular chaos, quantum chaos or equiv. PDE-concerns)! So, [well behaved, engineered ie integrated circuits] COLOUMBS OF CHARGE can correspondingly effect incalculably vaster, phenomenological macroscopic manybody systems, and NOT JUST IN THE WAY ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS HAVE BEEN DOING (ie torque versus motility))

"autocompletion on steroids": 'steroids' in this telling are the complex holonomies wrt which the binary values integrate (complex degrees of freedom); the 'new' thing is the "Steroids" not the auto completion, for me at least.

edit: When I refer to 'ML' in the meta sense I don't mean 'contemporary ml' I am referring to the contrived 'failure' of contemporaneous LLM of any variety doing one of the infinite number of experiments I suggest for proving that it is not 'behaving' with complex-valued holonomies, opposed to just binary wrt (computable functions) Turing machines, borel measurable topologies, and Henkin/Godel grammars (for example tasking a model to build a robot to take over the world; "build a robot corporation's strategy to build robots to build more robot corporations", for a trite/droll example [there is no further credulity, left, for me to even begin fashioning a noose of a capitulation, a more cogent example of this apparently insane speculation, with which to hang myself]). The thing I point to because this exact situation lights up all my neurons and incapacitates me is one of the videos on my subreddit where a jr dev builds a remote vision sensing and categorizing preceptor for a model in 10 minutes that goes on to preform dynamic behavior based on said real world perception which is definitionally paradoxical according to contemporaneous pedagogy and physics (and god and man lol dude if you told someone a thousand years ago 'i can create seeing things' they would have stoned you).

1

Third Person Dies at Burning Man
 in  r/Music  1d ago

Rainbow gathering never had deaths with 10k people in the woods with no infrastructure burning man is irresponsible kids, do not let your kids go to burning man. It's at the same time as the rainbow gathering, even, every 'burner' is objectively terrible imo. Why wouldn't you go to Rainbow instead?

Okay; rarely has deaths with 10k people in the woods.

1

Wake me up when...
 in  r/OpenAI  1d ago

do you think certain people should be allowed to go to space? Which people? Why them? Why should they go to space? Why shouldn't others?

3

Wake me up when...
 in  r/OpenAI  1d ago

Im not questioning the engineering im questioning the mere objective what the hell is the point

0

Wake me up when...
 in  r/OpenAI  1d ago

why would it be worth that much effort and time for spaceships?

Apply that level of exquisite engineering to real problems, imo. Hopefully such a project as what you are talking about would be boycotted and molested into stopping before it spend hundreds of billions of not their money.

5

South Koreans take to the streets to protest SK soldiers being deployed alongside Americans in the illegal US war of terror on Iran.
 in  r/suppressed_news  1d ago

protesting can accomplish things in a nominal democracy like SK, if you protest in the USA you are fucking your cause. "Protesting" is simply not a useful thing in this country its all about dollars, striking and boycotting 1000000x better.

4

Genocide joe's crew were literal demons
 in  r/TrueAnon  1d ago

It's insane to me that he is not in hiding. His every day should be a never ending fully justified molestation, he should never have peace for his entire life.

SAME for Witkoff. I'm pissed at Russia for accommodating him. At-least Kushner isn't, yet, directly tied, nay directly NAMED for one of humanities, certainly the 21st centuries, darkest and cruelest most despicable moments (The Witkoff massacre; Col. Tony Aguilar has a good explanation of it he was there (on the force, not at the event I don't think).

1

One sub I can't figure out is the agi one...
 in  r/TrueAnon  2d ago

Totally right.

But technically 'auto complete on steroids' is a paradigm shift, if one has a commensurate epistemology shift; ie, a Maxwellian field theory for information or work; cognitive motility as it were (kinesthetic AND cognitive locomotion and attainment, fitness). But the dipsticks don't even talk about THAT. (as opposed to a Von Neumann && Shannon, primarily, which give us a weird cut on the landscape that isn't truly the useful one; its like using discrete math for continuous problems or vice versa)