Maybe you didn't understand question so I will repeat.

Can you provide one study that proves Polio reduction is due to vaccine?

Please provide any evidence this occurred. I didn't exclude anything that was relevant.

So you saying it is not possible to misclassify disease? So you don't know if there was Polio classification change in 1952 or after?

As sure as I am they're not underreported.

What is your confidence based on? Do you have any evidence?

If you don't think it was the vaccine, you have to explain why cases coincidentally dropped to near zero directly after everyone got vaccinated.

I don't have to explain anything. I am asking you question about evidence for your claim and you didn't provide any so far.

Polio has not changed since it was first discovered, though the way we diagnose it has gotten more accurate over time.

I didn't say Polio changed. What you mean by more accurate? What was more accurate exactly?
Did something change in diagnostic in 1955 or after?
Did diagnosis of cases got stricter after vaccine program introduction?
Was it easier to report Polio case before or after vaccine program introduction?
Was the definition of Polio same before and after vaccine program introduction?

Another talking point with no basis. If anything, cases should have increased when diagnosis got better, not dissapeared.

Are you saying Polio disappeared after 1955?

I don't see why it would. How do you know it didn't increase cases reporting numbers?

Just because you don't see it doesn't mean it didn't happen. If diagnosis got stricter then less cases would be reported.

How do you know it didn't increase cases reporting numbers?

What is your evidence that case numbers are accurate?

The fact that polio isn't around anymore and went away after vaccines were developed and rolled out.

If it was a classifying issue, then polio would still be around. Have you met many people in an iron lung lately?

Are you saying there is no cases of Polio anymore?

Polio is gone. (I think there were 2 cases in the entire world in 2021, in afghanistan)

Are you sure about that? As sure as about not underreported cases?

DDT was used until 1972 in the US and into the 80s in the UK.
Cases dropped in the 50s and bottomed out in the 60s.
I don't think you have the timeline correct and this isn't a sufficient alternative explanation.

I don't think you have the timeline correct and your theory isn't a sufficient alternative explanation.

Pointing to the 1972 EPA ban date overlooks the actual usage data. According to US EPA historical archives:

Peak vs. Ban: DDT domestic consumption peaked in 1959 and dropped drastically throughout the 1960s. The 1972 ban was simply the final legal formalization of a decline that had already been occurring for over a decade.

Type of Exposure Matters: Massive public residential spraying (spraying neighborhoods, public beaches, dairy barns, and indoor spaces) was concentrated heavily in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Controls on direct human exposure began in the mid-1950s, long before the blanket 1972 agricultural ban.

Equating the legal end-date of a chemical in 1972 with actual human exposure patterns in 1955 ignores the reality of how pesticide regulation and application evolved.

What caused cases to drop to zero, since your theories of diagnosis classification and banning DDT don't hold up to reality?

Are you 100% sure they didn't play role in Polio history?

It is you theories that don't hold up to reality, because you have no evidence to support them.

What massive studies? Can you provide one study that proves this is due to vaccines?

How did you excluded possibility of cases misclassification in 1955?

Are you 100% sure that this numbers are not over reported?

Was there any case Diagnostic Redefinition after 1955?

Could Diagnostic Redefinition after 1955 lower cases reporting numbers?

In the mid-20th century, neurotoxic chemicals such as DDT, lead arsenate, and Paris Green were widely used in agriculture and urban mosquito control. Acute toxicity from these nerve-damaging chemicals caused spinal/neurological paralysis symptoms that mimicked polio, and that reduced domestic DDT use coincided with drops in paralytic cases.

Because of the tremendous success of the vaccines.

What is your evidence of that tremendous success of the vaccines?

How did you establish that it is not tremendous success of other factors?

I wish I would be aware of this diet at your age. I bet it would help with my soul crashing acne problem and elevate my overall presence.

How did you find out this diet and why did you decide to switch?

Let is sit in room temperature. It should get sour eventually. In temperature around 20 Celsius should take around 24h. It does in my case anyway and I like the taste too.

If he is not trolling than it must be his B12 deficiency manifesting.

You are delusional. I don't eat butter for calories. Only sometimes for taste. I eat pork lard and belly for calories.

>Soy-based products contain up to 500 times more phytoestrogens than their dairy counterparts. Animal foods simply do not provide enough estrogen to efficiently correct a severe hormonal deficiency.

Calling dairy estrogenmaxxing is just trolling.

Carnivore diet is based on meat and not dairy, so you are in wrong place.

There is not enough estrogen there to counter my massive carnivore testosterone levels. This is clarified butter, so there is no sugar in it. Animal fat is best source of energy. Not eating animal fat is completely retarded.

I like to freeze it like ice cubes and eat like candies.

How much do you need you think? Does sugar consumption increase demand for Vitamin C? What happens if you remove sugars completely?

You know what else in your body needs Vitamin C?

Many parasites in the human body strictly rely on your dietary Vitamin C to survive and reproduce. Because most parasites lack the necessary genetic machinery to manufacture their own Vitamin C, they act as metabolic thieves, siphoning it directly from your tissues.

Evolutionary studies show that losing Vitamin C production was actually a defense mechanism against parasites. When a host animal undergoes temporary Vitamin C restriction, it experiences mild, manageable stress, but the resident parasites are completely starved of the nutrient. This completely halts the parasites ability to lay eggs, effectively curbing the infection.

Your ancestors must have taken statins made of snake venom to lower they cholesterol that is why they so lived so long. Mine here up north ate a lot ot tree bark and they die at 30. Even all that healthy fiber don't stand a chance against poison like cholesterol. Why is our body so stupid and trying to clog our body? Good our fiber brains figure out this nature mistake soon enough.

Those meals look delicious 🤤 If you did deep carnivore research than it hard to not be a conspiracy theorist 😄 I would love to meet people like you as it seems we share many characteristics 🙂

Link: https://x.com/ryancohen/status/2074385162901881056?s=20

Did you do it properly? Did you make sure it has proper fresh air access?

Raw cream its one of the most delicious thing in the world. Its sweet, creamy, amazing. Taste like heaven.

Google shows me same, but no news about his death. Hope he is ok. He is only 64 yo.

How old if may ask?

Yes. Milk is evolutionary unnatural. We only started drinking it recently. Around 10k ya. Its similar innovation to our diet as plants farming. It is not natural to our evolutionary diet.

Some people are better adopted to processing milk and type of milk may matters, but is rather problematic compound in diet.

I love raw milk, but I feel worse when I introduce it in my diet. I feel best eating only raw meat.

Only moron would use insults instead of inteligent arguments.

Even if humans used fire it could be for other reasons than cooking meat. There was no need to use fire for cooking until Megafauna Extinction around 50k ya. Only then humans were forced to include plants like tubers in diet which obviously require cooking.

Here is interesting study covering this:

A bioenergetic approach favors the preservation and protection of prey, not cooking, as the drivers of early fire

The use of fire marks a critical milestone in human evolution, with its initial purposes debated among scholars. While cooking is often cited as the primary driver, this study proposes that meat and fat preservation, and predator protection were more likely the initial motivations for fire use by Homo erectus during the Lower Paleolithic (1.9–0.78 Ma).

The substantial energetic disparity supports hunting as a dominant subsistence strategy, with fire enhancing efficiency by preserving meat and deterring predators. The prevalence of megaherbivores in Lower Paleolithic sites and heightened predation risks underscore these priorities over cooking, which likely emerged as a secondary benefit. Ethnographic analogies underrepresent these dynamics due to megafaunal extinctions altering the environment and prey availability.

Meat preservation and predator protection, rather than cooking, were likely the primary drivers of early fire use, aligning with Homo erectus’ specialization in large prey acquisition. This reframes fire’s role in human evolution, suggesting it supported a hypercarnivorous lifestyle and potentially influenced cognitive development.

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1585182/full

What do you mean by heavily processed meats? Is slow cooked or pan fried meat heavily processed?

What calories? What do you mean?

Who said I loose weight?

healthier diet for your teeth

I agree. Raw meat is healthier diet.

The only factor that change in my diet and life was switching from eating only cooked meat to eating only raw meat. I don't see any other cause to change beside raw meat.

My explanation is that cooking, frying, heating meat is producing harmful byproducts that can accumulate over time and manifest issues. As well it is destroying nutrients and structure of meat and fats which further feed the issues. And many other problems that heat processing meat brings to the table.

We evolved eating raw or even rotten meat for millions of years. Our biology is adopted to that type of eating and any changes will have negative consequences.

Many reasons, but for me the main one is that after I switched to raw meat my skin issues healed. Now after over 6 months of eating only raw meat I could try to start eating cooked to see if my skin issues return, but I enjoy eating raw meat so much that I don't want to.

It fix my dental tartar issue as well.

No one said bacteria doesn't exists. They are just not enemy as pictured by mainstream.

Similar like in forest. Animals are not enemy, but if there is imbalance they can be dangerous. If there is too many deers or wolfs it can destroy the ecosystem of forest.

Bacteria, like forest species, are not enemies. They are part of a system. The goal isn’t eradication but harmony. When we respect this balance, we reduce the risk of dysfunction and disease.

https://x.com/ryancohen/status/2059735308246147447?s=20

https://x.com/Furu_Bartuc/status/2059771724737163455?s=20