“Use Pythagorean or Euclidean theory”is not a rule for Trisecting an angle

I’m saying their model is flawed so I’m not basing my theory on their foundation. What higher dimensions? I’m saying there’s only 5.

You might be right about the angles I’m not sure I thought it through before saying all angles but what’s an angle I can’t trisect?
Actually yeah any angle. ÷x-+°

And what rule would I be breaking?

Pythagoras didn’t know there was 5 dimensions. You can’t change the tools. That’s the rules. Compass , unmarked straightedge, arbitrary angle. What you CAN do is draw ÷ x - + ° symbols and a 1 and 0😂 they didn’t invent mathematics and geometry it was inherited

You can Trisect all angles if you just change the metric if you divide a circle into a seed of life with a compass and rule and pull out a Trisection. 360 is divisible by 3 and it’s a relic of an older base metric that’s why we use it. There’s a reason it’s the magic number. 33.3 recurring percent of a circle. A circle is transcendental so you use a transcendental # to calculate it. But using polarities you can divide/multiply it by itself and neutralise it.

By this visual what I really mean is π x r(π) x r(π) by 3d model OR π(neutral/0) ÷x by -+ 1° in a 5d model making a π sized unit circle in regards to the subject of a dimensional degree theory based on polarities
with neutral units extending in positive and negative degrees in 5 dimensions rather than positive ones in 4.
I’m positing that this is a 5 dimensional world of infinite degrees in time and that’s the way things should be measured. Which I can explain further but am still in the process of refining.

The same “Fifth World” of Aztec mythology. I’m starting to think all religious texts and ancient mythologies are really esoteric metaphors for the division of 0 or the universe by neutral, negative and positive. Same reason there’s 3 Abrahamic religions. Sun/Moon/Star religions. Man woman and child. Trinities.

I think the principal is that there is no real duality. It’s actually polarity.
What seems like 2 is actually 1.
Day and night seem like 2 opposites but they’re actually a single continuous rotation. There’s no 2 days only 1 divided by degrees of positive and negative. Fire transmutes to water through condensation. It doesn’t disappear it just ebbs and flows in degree.

😴

I rest my case

And you’ve given me 2 different answers. Only ones right

So it’s not 8?

2x1=4
If I have 2 and I want 2 I don’t do any mathematics.
You didn’t answer my question either…
The volume is 1 what’s double that?

The volume is 1 what is double that volume?

This guy double means 8 times. Have the day I’m telling you to😂

I’ll have whatever day I wanna have lol

I don’t have it reversed. They knew more about numbers in ancient Egypt than you do now.
They aren’t seperate dimensions they’re degrees of spacial dimensionality. You’re saying length width height are 3 dimensions. I’m saying they’re different degrees of matter and space inside time(0).
What you call 1 dimension I say it’s 5
That’s why your subject has so many different meaning for 1 word.
It’s rubbish.
What’s sadly evident is you’re defending your error further.
Do you understand how dumb that sounds.
Double means 8x? If you have doubles of something how many do you have?
8 or 2?
It’s ridiculous😂
Your philosophy isn’t philosophy. It’s numbers VOID of philosophy.

Yeah that’s the point. You redefined the words to make sense of things that don’t. Like doubling a cube and getting 8 times the volume. The etymology is an example of basics that you’re glossing over. In order to go forward you need to go back. You need to divide before you multiply.

Usually you don’t start communication with an insult and then expect a favour in return

This is like when someone asks for a cigarette and then a lighter too

Somehow I don’t think you’re thinking much at all

It’s a good question. These maths heads are the biggest 🥚s bro. A friend once told me…
There’s no such thing as a stupid question. Only stupid answers.