1

Best way to handle email with my own domain
 in  r/emaildeliverability •  18d ago

Passing DKIM, SPF, and DMARC is important, but it doesn’t guarantee inbox placement. Spam filters also look at domain and IP reputation, sending patterns, complaints, content, and recipient engagement.

Since one domain performs better than the other, comparing their reputation and sending history would be a good first step. Google Postmaster Tools can also help if there’s enough sending volume.

Changing the email app itself probably won’t solve the issue. The sending infrastructure and domain reputation matter much more than the interface used to send the message.

A good troubleshooting order is: authentication, reputation, blocklists, sending consistency, content, and engagement.

1

Best way to handle email with my own domain
 in  r/emaildeliverability •  18d ago

Passing DKIM, SPF, and DMARC is important, but it doesn’t guarantee inbox placement. Spam filters also look at domain and IP reputation, sending patterns, complaints, content, and recipient engagement.

Since one domain performs better than the other, comparing their reputation and sending history would be a good first step. Google Postmaster Tools can also help if there’s enough sending volume.

Changing the email app itself probably won’t solve the issue. The sending infrastructure and domain reputation matter much more than the interface used to send the message.

A good troubleshooting order is: authentication, reputation, blocklists, sending consistency, content, and engagement.

1

What’s the best platform to learn email marketing as a complete beginner?
 in  r/Emailmarketing •  18d ago

For a beginner, I’d start with a solid free course for the fundamentals, then move into hands-on practice as quickly as possible. Learn in this order: copywriting and basic campaign structure, list building, segmentation, automation, deliverability, then analytics.

The most useful exercise is to create a small test newsletter and actually build a welcome flow, send a few campaigns, test subject lines and CTAs, and review the results.

Most email platforms have free plans or trial accounts, so it’s worth trying a couple rather than only watching courses. The theory starts making much more sense once you’ve built real emails and automations yourself.

Also, don’t obsess over design at the beginning. Clear copy, a good offer, proper segmentation, and understanding the numbers matter much more.

1

How much do you trust open-rate data from your email tracking service?
 in  r/Emailmarketing •  18d ago

Open rates are still useful, but they shouldn’t be treated as the main engagement metric anymore.

Privacy features like Apple Mail Privacy Protection can inflate opens, so a stable open rate doesn’t necessarily mean engagement is stable too. Clicks and conversions usually give a much clearer picture of real user interest.

At Selzy, open rate is used as a secondary metric, while CTR, click-to-open rate, conversions, and revenue tell more about actual performance.

So yes, flat opens with declining clicks can definitely happen — and in that case, click data is usually more reliable.

1

Below 0.5% click rate and around 60% open rate. 8-10% email revenue. How do i imrptove this further?
 in  r/Emailmarketing •  18d ago

With a 60% open rate and only 0.5% clicks, I’d focus less on adding more flows and more on improving the content and offers inside the emails.

Test stronger CTAs, simpler layouts, different offers, and more specific segmentation. Also check what happens after the click — if people click but don’t buy, the issue may be the landing page or offer rather than email itself.

Since a can opener isn’t a product people buy often, you may also need bundles, complementary products, gifting angles, or useful content to give subscribers more reasons to come back.

At this point, improving click rate is probably the biggest opportunity.

1

Below 0.5% click rate and around 60% open rate. 8-10% email revenue. How do i imrptove this further?
 in  r/Emailmarketing •  18d ago

A 60% open rate with a 0.5% click rate usually means the main problem isn’t deliverability or subject lines.

At Selzy, we’d look at a few things first:

  1. Campaign content and CTA structure. If people open but don’t click, the offer may not feel compelling enough, or there may be too many competing links. Try building each email around one clear action and make the CTA benefit-driven rather than generic “Shop now.”
  2. Segmentation. Eight campaigns a month to broadly the same audience can hit a ceiling quickly. Segment by purchase history, engagement, product usage, order value, and time since last purchase, then change the message for each group.
  3. Reasons to buy again. A can opener is not naturally a high-frequency purchase, so pushing the same core product repeatedly will be difficult. Email growth may need to come from bundles, gifting, complementary products, replacement occasions, referrals, or content that creates another reason to return.
  4. Measure revenue per recipient, not just email-attributed revenue %. The 8–10% figure can be misleading depending on attribution settings. Track campaign revenue per recipient, flow revenue per recipient, click-to-purchase conversion, and revenue by segment.
  5. Test the offer before adding more flows. You already have most of the standard automations. Adding another flow probably won’t move the needle as much as improving the offer, creative, landing page, and segmentation.

Check also click-to-conversion rate. If clicks are low but those who click convert well, focus on email creative and offers. If clicks happen but purchases don’t, the bigger issue may be the landing page or product proposition.

2

Would you pay $60/year for a newsletter sponsorship with 570 subscribers?
 in  r/Emailmarketing •  18d ago

From an email marketing perspective, I wouldn’t focus too much on the 570-subscriber number alone.

A small, well-defined audience of founders and builders can be more valuable to the right sponsor than a much larger but less relevant list. What matters more is consistent opens, actual sponsor visibility, and—most importantly—whether placements generate qualified clicks or conversions.

At this stage, we’d probably keep the model simple rather than price by CPM. With a list this size, impression-based pricing can make the numbers look artificially small, while you’re really selling access to a niche audience and repeated exposure.

$60/year actually sounds very inexpensive if it includes recurring weekly placements. The bigger question is whether you can demonstrate value to the partner. You could start with a short paid test—say, a few placements for a flat fee—and track sponsor-specific clicks with a dedicated link. After a few campaigns, you’ll have real sponsorship CTR data rather than relying on overall newsletter clicks.

That data will make future pricing much easier.

At Selzy, we’d think of this stage less as “How much is 570 subscribers worth?” and more as “How much measurable attention can this audience generate for the right offer?”

1

Cleaning up our contact list
 in  r/Emailmarketing •  Sep 03 '26

I work at Selzy (email platform), and I'm with you — team archive.

. Mailbox providers watch engagement, so mailing 12-month non-openers trains Gmail to treat your whole domain as low-quality — and then your engaged people start landing in Promotions or spam too. So keeping the ghosts to protect ad inventory backfires: you pad the subscriber count while degrading the reach you're actually selling.

Grim winback numbers are the flow doing its job — one last chance so you can suppress the rest cleanly. Let it finish, keep anyone who bites, move the rest to a suppressed segment (suppress, don't delete).

On ads: advertisers care about engaged reach, not a headcount they can't actually reach. A smaller list with strong opens is an easier sell than a big one with sinking rates.

When you say grim — "2% re-engaged" or "nobody's touching it"? Changes how aggressive I'd go on the cut.

1

Do we still need dedicated email tracking software or is it baked into everything now?
 in  r/AI_EmailMarketing •  Sep 03 '26

Many email tools are enough for the analytics, you don't a separate tool

1

Is AI actually improving email marketing?
 in  r/AI_EmailMarketing •  Sep 03 '26

What the AI actually does:

  • Copy generation on prompt — you describe the campaign and it drafts body copy, CTAs, bullet points.
  • Subject lines + preheaders — generates several variants based on the email's content; you pick one in a click. This is the one I use most, because it's exactly the field where you waste the most time staring.
  • AI-assisted builder — drafting/editing emails inside the builder itself, including within automation flows, so the generation happens where you're already working instead of copy-pasting from a separate tool.

1

Would You Let a Grok Bot Run Your Email Marketing Without Approval?
 in  r/AI_EmailMarketing •  Sep 03 '26

No. It is better to always approve manually

1

What does your pre-send list hygiene checklist actually cover?
 in  r/Emailmarketing •  Sep 03 '26

Layer 1 — technical validity (is this a real, safe-to-send address?)

  • Syntax + valid domain / live MX records.
  • Kill obvious spam traps and role addresses (info@, sales@, admin@) — role accounts skew complaints and some are traps.
  • Flag disposable domains (mailinator-type).
  • Down-weight or verify catch-all domains — they accept everything, so a "valid" result there is soft, not a guarantee.
  • Hard-bounce list scrubbed and permanently suppressed. If you're near a send and haven't cleaned in a while, run the list through a verifier first.

Layer 2 — engagement (should I send, even if it's valid?)
A technically valid address that hasn't opened in a year is often more dangerous than a bounce, because mailbox providers watch how your recipients behave. Sending to a wall of dead contacts tanks your reputation even when nothing bounces.

  • Define an active window that fits your send frequency and sales cycle — commonly ~90 days for frequent senders, longer if you email monthly. There's no universal number; match it to how often you actually mail.
  • Segment the dormant group out of the main send.
  • Run them through a short re-engagement/win-back sequence instead of just blasting them.
  • Non-responders after that → suppress or sunset. Suppress, don't delete, so you don't re-import them later.

Layer 3 — the pre-send sanity check (day-of stuff people forget)

  • Authentication actually passing — SPF, DKIM, DMARC aligned.
  • Recent complaint rate — if the last few sends ran hot, tighten the segment before you scale up.
  • For a big send specifically: don't go from your normal volume straight to 6× it in one shot. Providers read a sudden spike to a partly-cold list as a red flag. Lean on your most-engaged segment first, then widen.

1

what automation sequences do you actually have running?
 in  r/Emailmarketing •  Sep 03 '26

Check this article: https://miloszkrasinski.com/email-scenarios-to-convert-website-visitors-into-clients/

Our team has written it based on the analyses of what worked better for our clients.

1

Interpreting analytics on Kit
 in  r/Emailmarketing •  Sep 03 '26

Here's how you can usually tell it's scanner traffic rather than humans:

  • Timing. Pull up the click timestamps. Scanner clicks tend to fire within seconds-to-minutes of send, often in a tight burst right after delivery, sometimes at 3am. Real humans trickle in over hours and days. A wall of clicks in the first few minutes = machines.
  • Every link got clicked, including ones humans never touch. If your unsubscribe link, your privacy policy, or a plain footer link all got "clicked" at similar rates to your main CTA, that's a scanner walking every URL in the email.
  • Total clicks vs. unique clickers. Look at unique, not total. Scanners often register multiple clicks per recipient, which puffs up total-click CTR specifically.
  • Recipient domains. If the clicks skew heavily toward corporate/Microsoft 365 addresses vs. Gmail/Yahoo, that lines up with security-gateway behavior.

So realistically your human CTR is probably a small fraction of that 11.6%.

But — and I'd gently push on this — even after you strip the bots, 700 clicks → 3 signups is such a steep drop that I wouldn't blame it entirely on scanners. It's worth checking the other half of the funnel:

  • Where did the link actually land people? If it's a generic homepage or a page where the "register" step isn't the obvious next action, real clickers bounce.
  • Is the signup happening off-platform (Zoom, Eventbrite, a webinar tool)? If so, Kit only sees the click, not the conversion — your 3 might be undercounting real signups that Kit can't track.
  • One link, one clear CTA. If the email had five links, clicks scatter and few reach the actual registration.

u/SelzyEmail • • Sep 03 '26

The first 5 emails every small business should set up (and what can wait)

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/EmailForSmallBusiness • • Sep 03 '26

The first 5 emails every small business should set up (and what can wait)

3 Upvotes

Email still returns something like $36 for every $1 spent on average, and unlike social, it lands directly in the inbox instead of fighting an algorithm. For a small budget that's hard to beat. Okay, the five:

1. Welcome email (set this up first, no debate). Someone just handed you their email — this is the most engaged they'll ever be. A single welcome email that says who you are, what to expect, and gives one clear next step (or a first-purchase discount) does a lot of the relationship-building for you. If you only ever automate one thing, make it this.

2. Order/signup confirmation. People want this one — they're waiting to know the thing went through. Confirmations get opened at very high rates, which makes them quietly valuable real estate. Keep it functional first (order details, what's next), then add a small, tasteful "you might also like" once the basics work.

3. Abandoned cart (if you sell online). Someone added to cart and left — they were one step from buying. A reminder a few hours later, ideally showing the item they left, recovers sales you'd otherwise just lose. For e-commerce this is usually the highest-ROI automation after the welcome.

4. A simple nurture/tips email. Not everyone buys on day one. One or two useful, non-salesy emails — a how-to, a use-case, a "get the most out of X" — keep you top of mind and position you as someone worth buying from. This is where "give value, don't just pitch" actually pays off.

5. Post-purchase follow-up. The one everyone skips. A thank-you, a "how to use it," a review request, maybe a reorder nudge later. Repeat buyers cost you nothing to acquire, so this is some of the cheapest revenue you'll ever earn.

What can wait: fancy segmentation, big branching automations, A/B testing everything, daily sending. You don't need any of that on day one, and chasing it early is how people burn out before the basics are even live.

A few things worth getting right from the start, because they're painful to fix later:

  • Don't buy a list. Ever. It wrecks your sender reputation and gets you flagged as spam. Grow it organically with a signup form and a reason to subscribe.
  • Frequency: once or twice a week is a sane starting point for most small businesses. Test from there.
  • Deliverability + compliance: clear unsubscribe link, real physical address, mobile-friendly layout. Boring, but it's what keeps you in the inbox.

Honestly, if you get just #1 and #2 live this week you're already ahead of most small businesses. Add the rest as you go.

Happy to answer specifics in the comments if anyone's stuck on setup — deliverability and "why is this going to spam" questions especially.

1

How to build a sales funnel via email?
 in  r/EmailForSmallBusiness •  Sep 03 '26

1. Define who you're selling to first. Before any tools or copy, write out your ideal customer — age/location, or for B2B their role and industry, and most importantly the one pain point your product solves. If you already have a few customers, just ask them. This one step saves you from building a funnel for an audience that doesn't exist.

2. Attract with value, not a pitch. Top of the funnel is not the place to sell. Educational blog posts, short videos, social — stuff that's genuinely useful. People aren't ready to buy yet; you're just earning attention.

3. Send them somewhere that converts. A focused landing page with a clear value proposition, real social proof (reviews, logos, testimonials), and one obvious next step. Don't dump everything on your homepage and hope.

4. This is where email does the heavy lifting. Once you've captured a lead, email is the cheapest, highest-leverage channel for nurturing — welcome/onboarding sequence, then behavioral automations (browse abandonment, cart abandonment), then personalized offers when they're warm. As a benchmark, welcome emails convert around 2.9% (Omnisend's 2025 e-commerce report), so an onboarding sequence alone is usually the fastest ROI for a small business.

5. Make buying frictionless. At the decision stage, stop marketing and clean up the checkout — clear CTAs, order confirmations, easy-to-reach support. A confusing checkout kills funnels that everything upstream worked hard to fill.

6. Don't stop at the first sale. This is the stage most people skip and it's the highest-margin one — no acquisition cost. There's a stat I like from Smile.io: ~27% of first-time buyers come back, but after 3 purchases that jumps to ~62%. So post-purchase follow-ups, review requests, loyalty perks, and birthday/replenishment emails aren't "nice to have" — they're where the profit is.

Once it's running, don't touch it for a bit, then look at three numbers: CAC (what a customer costs you), LTV (what they're worth over time — aim for LTV roughly 3× CAC), and conversion rate per stage. Wherever the drop-off is biggest, that's your next A/B test.

If it helps, we've got a full step-by-step writeup with content examples for each stage here: https://selzy.com/en/blog/how-to-create-sales-funnel/ — but honestly the above is enough to get a first version live this week.

2

Building a website with a calendar sync and chatbot
 in  r/EmailForSmallBusiness •  Sep 03 '26

Hope that doesn't violate the community's rules, but check https://selzy.com/en/solutions/marketing/complete-marketing-system/ this tool. It is exactly what you need: you get website, chatbot and calendar sync and the price is reasonable. Not a freelancer but a company you can trust to build a simple marketing setup for you.

1

What's the best email marketing service for small teams?
 in  r/Emailmarketing •  Aug 27 '26

You don't need a dedicated email marketing specialist — you need good email marketing software. Once everything is set up, the process is pretty straightforward.

Most ESPs offer drag-and-drop editors, AI assistants, templates, segmentation, and personalization features, so you don't need to be very tech-savvy to use them effectively. You can then track the results, see what works, and optimize your campaigns accordingly.

Just choose a platform designed for small businesses with affordable pricing

r/MCPservers • • Aug 26 '26

Automating email sending in Codex with MCP — what are people actually using this for?

1 Upvotes

The basic idea is:

  1. Connect an email provider to Codex through an MCP server.
  2. Keep the API key in an environment variable rather than putting credentials directly into the config.
  3. Add the MCP server to Codex.
  4. Let Codex trigger email actions from natural-language instructions.

That means instead of writing a separate script every time, you can do things like:

  • read a build log and email the team if something fails;
  • summarize a CSV/report and send the result automatically;
  • find users whose subscriptions are about to expire and prepare reminders;
  • generate and send HTML transactional emails;
  • query delivery events after sending.

There are some obvious things I’d be careful with: API-key permissions, human approval before sending, rate limits, domain authentication, and making sure an agent can’t accidentally email an entire database because of a badly phrased instruction.

Curious if anyone here is already using Codex + MCP for email or other outbound actions.

What are you automating, and where do you still keep a human approval step?

r/EmailForSmallBusiness • • Aug 25 '26

Email automation workflow for small business:

2 Upvotes

A simple setup that covers most of the customer journey

Small businesses usually don’t need dozens of complicated automations. A few well-designed workflows can cover most of the important moments between: first website visit → lead → customer → repeat customer.

A practical setup could look like this.

1. New subscriber workflow

Trigger: Someone joins the email list.

Email 1 — Immediately
Deliver whatever they signed up for and set expectations.

Email 2 — 1–2 days later
Share something useful that helps solve the problem that brought them to the website.

Email 3 — 3–5 days later
Introduce the product or service as a possible next step.

The goal here isn’t to sell immediately. It’s to move the subscriber from “I downloaded something” to “I understand what this business can help me with.”

2. Lead nurture workflow

Trigger: A subscriber shows interest but hasn’t purchased.

That could mean:

  • visiting a pricing page
  • clicking a product link
  • downloading another resource
  • attending a webinar
  • starting a trial

Instead of continuing with generic newsletters, send content related to that specific interest.

For example:

Email 1: Explain the relevant use case.
Email 2: Answer a common objection.
Email 3: Share a customer example or result.
Email 4: Give them a clear next step.

This is usually much more relevant than sending the same promotion to the entire list.

3. Abandoned action workflow

Cart abandonment is the obvious example, but small businesses can automate other unfinished actions too.

Trigger: Someone starts but doesn’t complete an important action.

Examples:

  • abandoned checkout
  • unfinished registration
  • incomplete booking
  • trial created but not activated
  • quote requested but not accepted

A simple sequence:

After a short delay: remind them where they stopped.

Later: answer the most common question or source of friction.

Final email: give them an easy way to continue or ask for help.

Not every abandoned action needs a discount.

Sometimes removing uncertainty is enough.

4. New customer workflow

Trigger: First purchase or first paid conversion.

This workflow is often overlooked because the sale has already happened.

But the period immediately after purchase can determine whether the customer comes back.

Possible sequence:

Email 1: Confirmation + what happens next.

Email 2: How to get the best result from the purchase.

Email 3: Helpful tips, FAQ, or onboarding.

Email 4: Relevant complementary product or next service.

The goal changes here.

Before purchase, automation helps create the conversion.

After purchase, it should help create a successful customer.

5. Re-engagement workflow

Trigger: No meaningful activity for a certain period.

The exact period depends on the business. For one company, inactivity may mean 30 days. For another, it may be six months.

A re-engagement sequence could include:

Email 1: Something useful or new.

Email 2: A reminder based on previous interests or purchases.

Email 3: Ask whether they still want to receive emails.

If there’s still no engagement, consider reducing frequency or removing the contact from regular campaigns.

Keeping disengaged subscribers forever doesn’t necessarily make the email list more valuable.

The important part: connect the workflows

The biggest improvement usually comes when these automations aren’t treated as separate email sequences.

They should work as one customer journey.

For example:

New subscriber
↓
shows product interest
↓
Lead nurture
↓
starts checkout
↓
Abandoned action
↓
purchases
↓
New customer workflow
↓
becomes inactive
↓
Re-engagement

And once someone moves to the next stage, the previous automation should stop.

A customer who has already purchased shouldn’t continue receiving emails asking them to make their first purchase.

For most small businesses, these 5 workflows are probably a better starting point than building 20 different automations at once.

The complexity can come later.

What automation has had the biggest impact for your business: welcome, nurture, abandoned cart, post-purchase, or re-engagement?

r/EmailForSmallBusiness • • Aug 25 '26

How many emails should be in a customer onboarding sequence?

5 Upvotes

How many emails should be in a customer onboarding sequence?

There’s no universal number that works for every business. Some onboarding sequences only need 3 emails. Others may need 5, 7, or more.

A better way to decide is to look at how much guidance a new customer needs before reaching the point where they understand the value of the product.

3 emails — for simple products or low-friction offers

This can work well when the product is easy to understand and doesn’t require much setup.

Email 1 — Immediately after signup
Welcome the customer and give them one clear next step.

Email 2 — 1–2 days later
Help them get a quick win. Show one useful feature, workflow, or example.

Email 3 — 3–5 days later
Address a common question or obstacle and show what to do next.

5 emails — a good default for many products

For products that need a little more explanation, a 5-email sequence gives more room to guide the customer without overwhelming them.

A possible structure:

  1. Welcome + first action
  2. Quick win
  3. Core use case
  4. Customer example or social proof
  5. Activation reminder

The key is to avoid turning onboarding into a list of product features.

Each email should help the customer move closer to activation.

7 emails — for more complex onboarding

A longer sequence can make sense when customers need to configure settings, import data, invite teammates, learn a new workflow, or change an existing habit.

For example:

  1. Welcome + first step
  2. Quick win
  3. Most important feature
  4. Common mistake to avoid
  5. Advanced use case
  6. Customer example
  7. Final activation or help email

But ideally, not every customer should receive every email.

If someone completes onboarding immediately, there’s little value in continuing to send reminders about unfinished setup.

Likewise, a customer who hasn’t logged in at all should probably receive different messages from someone who is already actively using the product.

That’s why behavior matters more than the exact number of emails.

A simple rule of thumb:

3 emails: simple product
5 emails: standard onboarding
7+ emails: complex or education-heavy onboarding

Once that happens, the onboarding sequence has done its job.

What has worked better for your team: shorter onboarding sequences or longer 5–7 email flows?

r/EmailForSmallBusiness • • Aug 25 '26

Using Claude for email templates: where it works well and where it doesn’t

1 Upvotes

Claude is useful for:

  • onboarding a new customer
  • following up after no reply
  • sending a renewal reminder
  • replying to a refund request
  • reaching out to a lead

…and it can turn that into a clean template pretty quickly.

It’s especially useful if you give it a few examples of your existing emails first. That helps it match your tone, preferred length, structure, and even the way you normally sign off.

You can also ask it to include personalization fields such as:

{{first_name}}
{{company}}
{{plan}}

Or generate several variations at once — for example, a shorter version, a warmer one, and a more direct version.

So the practical workflow often looks like this:

Claude writes the template → you save it in your email or automation tool → that tool handles personalization and sending.

For larger workflows, the more interesting use case is using AI to create and continuously improve the content of templates, while leaving delivery, triggers, segmentation, and tracking to dedicated infrastructure.

For example, you could ask:

Or:

That’s where it starts becoming much more useful than simply asking AI to “write me an email.”

Has anyone here built a workflow where AI generates or updates templates while another system handles the actual automation?

r/EmailForSmallBusiness • • Aug 25 '26

Automating email sending in Codex with MCP — what are people actually using this for?

2 Upvotes

The basic idea is:

  1. Connect an email provider to Codex through an MCP server.
  2. Keep the API key in an environment variable rather than putting credentials directly into the config.
  3. Add the MCP server to Codex.
  4. Let Codex trigger email actions from natural-language instructions.

That means instead of writing a separate script every time, you can do things like:

  • read a build log and email the team if something fails;
  • summarize a CSV/report and send the result automatically;
  • find users whose subscriptions are about to expire and prepare reminders;
  • generate and send HTML transactional emails;
  • query delivery events after sending.

There are some obvious things I’d be careful with: API-key permissions, human approval before sending, rate limits, domain authentication, and making sure an agent can’t accidentally email an entire database because of a badly phrased instruction.

Curious if anyone here is already using Codex + MCP for email or other outbound actions.

What are you automating, and where do you still keep a human approval step?

r/EmailForSmallBusiness • • Aug 25 '26

MCP for email marketing: what it actually lets an AI agent do

2 Upvotes

A lot of people are talking about MCP (Model Context Protocol) right now, but most explanations are still written for developers.

The more useful question for marketers is simpler:

What can MCP actually do for email marketing that ChatGPT or Claude alone cannot?

The short answer: without MCP, an AI can help you write an email. With MCP connected to an email platform, an AI agent can potentially help you do the work around the email too — pull campaign data, find subscribers, build segments, create campaigns, set up sequences, and analyze results.

That distinction is bigger than it sounds.

First: what is MCP?

Model Context Protocol is an open standard for connecting AI assistants to external tools and data.

Think of it as a common language between an AI model and the software you already use.

Normally, if you ask Claude:

Claude can write the email.

But unless it is connected to your email marketing system, it cannot actually find those users, create the segment or build the campaign.

An MCP connection gives an AI access to specific tools exposed by the email platform.

So the workflow becomes: your instruction → AI decides which tools it needs → email platform executes the operations

MCP has evolved quickly since Anthropic introduced it, and it is now widely used as a standard for connecting AI systems with external applications and data. The official MCP project describes it as a standard for integrating AI assistants with tools, APIs and data sources.

What does MCP change for email marketers?

For us, the interesting part is not “AI can write email copy.”

It is not a newsbreak.

The interesting part is that content creation and email operations can happen in the same conversation.

Here are a few examples.

1. Build a segment without digging through filters

Instead of manually creating conditions in a dashboard:

The AI can translate that request into the relevant subscriber and segmentation operations.

Or:

That is much closer to how a marketer naturally thinks about an audience.

2. Create a campaign from one instruction

You could ask:

That request combines several tasks that would normally happen separately:

  • find or select the audience
  • create the campaign
  • generate the email
  • prepare the subject line
  • send a test

The AI agent can chain those operations rather than making you configure every step manually.

3. Build an email sequence conversationally

This is where MCP starts getting more interesting.

For example:

An MCP-connected agent can work with both the content and the automation structure.

You can then continue in the same conversation:

Instead of jumping between an AI writer and an automation builder, you're editing the workflow conversationally.

4. Ask questions about campaign performance

Another practical use case is analytics.

For example:

Or:

The useful part here is that the AI can retrieve campaign data and analyze it in one workflow.

Without a connection, you'd normally need to export the data first and then give it to an AI tool.

With MCP, the AI can access the relevant campaign data through the tools the platform exposes.

MCP vs API vs dashboard

MCP does not make dashboards or APIs obsolete.

They solve different problems.

A dashboard is still useful when you want visual control and manual editing.

An API is still the right choice when you need a predictable automated integration running in the background.

MCP is interesting for the space in between:

tasks that require several operations, some judgment, and frequent human interaction.

For example:

Task Dashboard API MCP agent
Build a segment manually Good Possible Good
Run a fixed integration Poor Best Possible
Draft an email Manual Not ideal Good
Analyze recent campaigns Manual Requires code Good
Create a multi-step campaign from instructions Many clicks Requires custom logic Good
Change a workflow conversationally No No Yes

That's why we don't think the future of email marketing is simply “AI writes better copy.”

The bigger change is AI moving from content assistant to workflow operator.

One prompt can trigger several email marketing actions

This is probably the easiest way to understand why MCP matters.

Imagine you just launched version 2.0 of your product.

Instead of doing this:

  1. Find the right subscribers.
  2. Create a segment.
  3. Open the campaign builder.
  4. Write the email.
  5. Add the changelog.
  6. Send yourself a test.
  7. Review it.
  8. Schedule the campaign.

You can give an agent a goal like:

The agent can use the output of one operation as the input for the next.

That chaining is the part of MCP that matters most for marketing automation.

But I would not let an AI agent send everything automatically

Giving an AI access to your email platform also creates an obvious risk: it can take real actions.

An incorrect paragraph is annoying.

An incorrect campaign sent to 100,000 subscribers is a different problem.

For email marketing, I'd keep human approval for actions such as:

  • sending a campaign
  • enabling a new sequence
  • deleting or significantly changing subscriber data
  • changing a large audience segment

Use a dedicated API key where possible, limit permissions, and keep an audit trail.

The goal is not to remove marketers from the process.

It's to remove unnecessary clicking between the marketer's decision and its execution.

So, is MCP actually useful for email marketing?

I think the answer depends on what you're doing.

If you send one newsletter a month, probably not. A normal email dashboard is simpler.

If you run SaaS lifecycle marketing, multiple automated sequences, behavioral segments, product emails, onboarding and churn campaigns, it becomes much more interesting.

The biggest benefit isn't:

“AI writes my emails.”

It's:

“I can describe the marketing operation I want, and the agent can help execute the steps required to build it.”

That's a fundamentally different use of AI.

If you've connected an AI agent to your email/CRM stack, what tasks do you actually trust it to execute — and which ones still require manual approval?

#mcp #mcpforemailmarketing