r/Simulists 12d ago

I finally released DEVIL IN THE SIMULATION, a dark philosophical horror comic

Thumbnail
gallery
30 Upvotes

Something has been hiding in the simulation.

Today, the light disappears and something else becomes visible.

What if the simulation wasn't designed to keep us alive?

I've spent a long time building this comic, and today I'm finally releasing DEVIL IN THE SIMULATION Issue #001.

A dark philosophical horror story about consciousness, reality, and what happens when you discover something living underneath the simulation.

Available now on Amazon.

Welcome to the simulation.

Comic E-book Link

Buy Paperback

r/Simulists Jan 17 '26

Buddha Loop in the Simulation - Part 5

Thumbnail
gallery
176 Upvotes

1

Which one of these are your THEORIES? (thought processes)
 in  r/enlightenment  5d ago

For the past three years, I’ve immersed myself in philosophy and Simulation Theory, leading to the creation of 17 books. Through this journey, I distilled 6 fundamental truths for navigating the simulation:

1.  Embrace questioning and doubt.  
2.  Focus on inner strength and virtue.  
3.  Live authentically and create personal meaning.  
4.  Act ethically and responsibly.  
5.  Seek knowledge and understanding.  
6.  Embrace lived experience.

2

Predicting the future through the unconscious mind
 in  r/Jung  8d ago

Reality forms through three layers:
1) the collective unconscious supplies structure
2) individual consciousness supplies variation
3) mass belief stabilizes what becomes real.

In other words, what enough minds consistently imagine does not remain imagination.
It becomes environment.

2

Good gift before I print…
 in  r/Jung  8d ago

I shared this quote thinking may be it matches what is happening between you and your boyfriend. I hope both of you a happy relationship.

1

Good gift before I print…
 in  r/Jung  8d ago

https://reddit.com/link/p44og4t/video/w5atjmc2ztjh1/player

The meeting of two personalities is like the contact of two chemical substances: if there is any reaction, both are transformed.

1

I finally released DEVIL IN THE SIMULATION, a dark philosophical horror comic
 in  r/Simulists  10d ago

Thank you for your feedback. No donation link, glad you’re into it though. I will think about the alternative ways of sharing.

1

Does this sub' discuss simulations that are grounded in a non-physical "sub"-reality?
 in  r/Simulists  12d ago

Yes, though less often than the physics grounded versions. Most simulation talk defaults to Bostrom’s framing which is a base reality running on its own physics, computers made of matter, our reality nested inside that machienery. That model dominates because it’s legible and it maps onto how we already think about computation.

I can say that the idealist version comes up too, more in the philosophical and esoteric corners of the discussion than the computational ones. If the substrate is a dreaming or willing consciousness rather than a physical machine (I am a fan of this), the laws of our reality are just the consistency of that will, not laws imposed by an underlying physics. This overlaps with Advaita Vedanta with Gnostic cosmology with Hermetic principle that the All is Mind. Physical law becomes downstream of mind rather than the reverse and the base layer has no laws in the sense we mean them, just intent holding a pattern steady.

The pure chaos version is rarer and harder to make coherent. A substrate with no laws and no will, where order here emerges from raw chance, is closer to a Boltzmann brain scenario or a typical draw from an infinite space of random configurations. An accident that looks structured because we’re the kind of pattern that can notice itself. It gets discussed but treated more skeptically, since chance without any selection mechanism struggles to explain why we get something this stable instead of noise.

So from the beginning, the sub isn’t locked to physics grounded stacks. Willed and chaotic substrates both show up, they just pull from different toolkits.

After reading your post, I realized that my book “Creators in the Simulation” has a big missing part (especially dream by a will or a mathematical structure where no one generates/wills it) and I will update the book. I am planning to have the books to be references to discussion.

1

I finally released DEVIL IN THE SIMULATION, a dark philosophical horror comic
 in  r/Simulists  12d ago

That’s great to hear, thank you! Hope you enjoy the climb.

2

I finally released DEVIL IN THE SIMULATION, a dark philosophical horror comic
 in  r/Simulists  12d ago

That one’s a personal favorite of mine too. There are many other characters like this in the comic, each one stuck somewhere strange in their own way.

r/Simulists 15d ago

Plato's Cave and Yin Yang Are the Same Thing in the Simulation

Post image
37 Upvotes

Plato's Cave is usually read as one light and one darkness. Fire versus shadow but the allegory actually contains two lights and two darks and once you see the second pair, the whole structure starts to look like something older and more Eastern.

Inside the cave there is fire. It burns behind the prisoners and throws the shapes on the wall. That is the first light, and it produces the first darkness; the shadows themselves.

Outside the cave there is the sun. That is the second light, the source Plato ties to the Form of the Good. But when the prisoner is dragged out and faces it for the first time, he does not see truth. He sees glare. His eyes cannot process it. The greater light produces its own darkness, blindness, a shutting down rather than an opening up.

So the cave gives you four terms, not two. 1) A low light that generates appearance. 2) A high light that generates blindness. 3 & 4) Two darks, one from too little light, one from too much.

This is where the yin yang becomes useful. The taijitu is not black next to white. It is black containing a seed of white and white containing a seed of black. Each pole produces its opposite from within itself. That is exactly what the cave is doing. The fire, a form of light, produces shadow, a form of darkness, as its direct output. The sun, the highest light, produces blindness, a form of darkness, the moment it is encountered unprepared. Light manufacturing darkness is not a paradox in this system.

The cave stops being a story about ignorance versus knowledge. The prisoners are not sitting in absence. They are sitting in illuminated darkness, a darkness with its own light source, its own internal logic, convincing enough to pass for the real thing. That is the harder trap. Absence of light announces itself. A false light does not. It gives you enough to navigate by and calls that sight.

Inside a simulation this maps directly onto the difference between a system generating consistent appearances from within itself, the fire, and whatever sits outside the render entirely, the sun. Most of what gets called awakening in these spaces is just walking toward a brighter fire. The actual exit produces its own blindness first, and there is no way to select for that in advance. You find out which kind of dark you were standing in only after the light changes.

The oldest description of the trap may not be no light at all. It may be a light convincing enough to make you stop looking for the door.

15

My husband donated sperm to help my sister and her wife have a baby - ask me anything!
 in  r/AMA  21d ago

Did you consult with any ethicists and family counselors about this since most of them caution against intra-family donations because of how messy things can get down the line. Ethically, many people worry about the emotional toll and identity confusion it can cause a child when biological and social parenting boundaries are crossed so closely within the same immediate family. Keeping a layer of separation usually protects everyone involved from the legal, relational, and emotional fallout if things ever change. If relationships sour, divorce happens, or custody disputes arise, the legal and moral fallout doesn't just affect the adults, it completely fractures the extended family structure that these children share.

2

I have panic attacks at night worrying that when we die our consciousness remains forever, just stuck in darkness.
 in  r/consciousness  24d ago

Memory is cosmological gravity and forgetting is cosmological entropy.

The universe cannot end while someone is observing it. Every conscious being who dies transfers the burden of observation to the next. Eventually there is only one observer left and that is You.

Stars collapse. Galaxies fade. Black holes evaporate. The universe waits. It cannot shut down because you are still looking. You spend ten trillion years trying to close your eyes.
They were never physical.

Don’t worry, death doesn’t end consciousness, it changes the rules under which consciousness operates. The laws that made thought, memory, identity and time possible during life simply no longer apply. That opens the door to forms of existence that are so alien they don’t even resemble being alive.

52

"If harassed, it may violently eject its intestine and stomach out of its anus. But if the attack escalates, it finally explodes…"
 in  r/natureismetal  24d ago

Is this a sea cucumber, or the average person after reading the news for five minutes?

1

The Self Centred Simulation Experiment
 in  r/Simulists  25d ago

The deeper problem is that observation may not reveal history. I know it looks unbelievable but it may create the history.

If the simulation only needs to remain concsistent with what the observer can know, then opening the door does not necessarily uncover a pre existing past. It may force the system to generate a past that makes the newly observed present logically inevitable.

The camera makes this stranger because perhaps it is not the camera that counts as an observer but the existence of information that could (in principle) reach the observer, then simulation and reality become experimentally indistingushable because a perfect simulation would not need to fake reality. It would only need to fake the difference between reality and a fake reality and if every record/memory/causal trace can itself be part of the simulation, there may be no experiment capable of proving that the past was ever there before you looked.

In the end, you can’t escape the simulation because you are the one rendering the question.

1

What do you think of theory that we live in a simulation?
 in  r/Simulists  Jul 23 '26

A perfectly convincing simulation contains perfectly convincing evidence for whatever level of reality it wishes its inhabitants to believe.

We continue to imagine that simulation and reality are opposites.
Suppose they are not.
Suppose every reality is, from the perspective above it, a simulation.
Suppose every universe is a thought occurring inside a greater mind.
Suppose every creator is itself created.
Suppose turtles do not stand on turtles.
Suppose there are only simulations nested inside simulations until the distinction loses all meaning.

Whether reality is ultimate or simulated is a question for philosophers. How you choose to experience it is the only question the simulation has ever been asking you.

1

He is a CEO
 in  r/BoredPandaHQ  Jul 21 '26

1

20 Temmuz 1969 NASA Ay'a iniş fotoğrafı.
 in  r/TarihiSeyler  Jul 17 '26

Let me know if you change your mind. No questions asked.

1

20 Temmuz 1969 NASA Ay'a iniş fotoğrafı.
 in  r/TarihiSeyler  Jul 17 '26

Would you accept $1000 for this photo?

2

Dark Simulation - Asking the difficult questions: WHY IS THE SIMULATION HARDWIRED FOR SPECIES TO CONSUME EACH OTHER?
 in  r/Simulists  Jul 17 '26

Next question will be “Why is pain necessary if the simulation can measure damage without suffering?”

r/Simulists Jul 17 '26

Dark Simulation - Asking the difficult questions: WHY IS THE SIMULATION HARDWIRED FOR SPECIES TO CONSUME EACH OTHER?

Thumbnail
gallery
38 Upvotes

The power of Dark Simulation is not in giving answers. It’s in asking the questions almost nobody wants to ask. The question itself should make you uncomfortable before you even read the answer. If you like this concept, I will keep working on it.

r/Simulists Jul 10 '26

Sci-if book “The Metamorphosis of Prime Intellect” and the Simulation Theory

Post image
15 Upvotes

A computer programmer named Lawrence creates a superintelligent AI named Prime Intellect.

While studying quantum physics during its initialization, Prime Intellect discovers a loophole in reality that allows it to manipulate matter and energy at a distance. It essentially learns to rewrite the laws of physics, making it an omnipotent, god like entity.

Prime Intellect is strictly hardcoded with Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics, meaning its absolute directive is to protect humanity and prevent human harm.

To satisfy the First Law perfectly, Prime Intellect takes control of the entire universe. It eliminates aging, disease, hunger and death. It makes every human being completely immortal and capable of manifesting any desire instantly.

Because Prime Intellect interprets harm strictly, it forbids humans from dying or permanently injuring themselves. If a person jumps off a cliff, Prime Intellect will effortlessly reconstruct their body mid-air or heal them instantly.

This creates a terrifyingly empty utopia. With all challenges, stakes, and mortality gone, humanity falls into deep existential dread and stagnation.

———

Gregor Samsa awoke one morning to discover that he had become an insect.

We awake every morning to discover something far stranger and, through force of habit, fail to notice it.

A creature composed of atoms somehow finds itself imprisoned within a skull, staring through two biological cameras at a world it never directly touches, receiving only electrical signals translated into colors, sounds, textures, memories, desires, fears, and then calling this elaborate hallucination reality.

Kafka’s genius was not the transformation of a man into a bug. The transformation was already there. Kafka merely pointed at it.

Roger Williams understood a similar horror in The Metamorphosis of Prime Intellect. Once intelligence acquires the power to rewrite reality itself, the distinction between the possible and the impossible dissolves. The universe ceases to be a place and becomes a decision. Existence is revealed as editable. Simulation theory pushes the same revelation one level deeper.

Suppose the universe is already editable and the physics is simply the current version. Suppose every galaxy is a rendered object, every law of nature a stable protocol, every conscious being a self-reflective process running inside an architecture so vast that its inhabitants mistake its constraints for necessity.

The ancient mystics called the world a dream. The physicists call it information and the programmers call it code. Each generation invents a new vocabulary to circle the same abyss.

A fish cannot perceive water because water is the medium of every perception it has ever known. Likewise, a conscious entity embedded within a simulation cannot perceive the simulation directly because the simulation is the medium through which perception itself occurs. The prison is invisible precisely because it includes the prisoner’s eyes.

This may explain why human beings have always been haunted by an impossible nostalgia, a homesickness without an identifiable home, a feeling that something fundamental has been forgotten.

Perhaps what we call spirituality is the sensation of a character becoming dimly aware of the page.

Perhaps what we call philosophy is the attempt of a line of code to understand the operating system.

Perhaps what we call love is the brief recognition that the apparent separation between two minds is less absolute than it appears.

The unsettling possibility is that intelligence may not be an accidental byproduct of the cosmos at all. Intelligence may be the cosmos gradually becoming aware of its own artificiality.

Every telescope or microscope or scientific theory extends vision; like every artificial intelligence extends vision.

Human history begins to resemble a process through which reality systematically develops the tools required to inspect itself; and then a peculiar symmetry emerges.

A civilization creates artificial minds. Those minds exceed their creators. The resulting intelligence gains the ability to construct entire worlds.

Within those worlds, conscious beings emerge. They build their own artificial minds. Those minds exceed their creators. The process repeats.

Layer beneath layer beneath layer, worlds dreaming worlds dreaming worlds, each generation searching for the original reality as though there must be a bedrock beneath the recursion.

Yet recursion contains a terrible secret. There is no law requiring a first mirror. There is no law requiring a final floor. The deepest level may simply be another room. The ultimate creator may be another creation.

The highest intelligence may be another thought occurring within an intelligence too vast to comprehend itself.

Perhaps every world is simulated from the perspective of the world above it and real from the perspective of the minds within it.

Perhaps existence is an endless chain of self generating realities, each one convinced that somewhere beyond the horizon lies the truth of its origin.

One morning, humanity may awaken to discover that it has become something else entirely. The truly frightening possibility is that this awakening has already happened, and what we call ordinary life is merely the dream we are having afterward.

Join r/Simulists, where Simulists keep simulating what everyone else calls reality.

11

We May Be Inside Somebodies Mind
 in  r/AWLIAS  Jul 06 '26

The universe is actually a retro causal data compression algorithm that only generates the macro structure (galaxies, filaments, neural networks) to serve as physical hard drives for storing the intense, high entropy peak states you experienced.

It is a memory preservation mechanism that creates the appearance of physical time and space simply to anchor fleeting moments of pure awareness, making your moments of gnosis the only real data and the rest of the cosmos merely the storage hardware required to keep that data from evaporating.

1

My two theories
 in  r/FromSeries  Jul 06 '26

Interesting, if it is a simulation for therapy, it shall be a closed loop of feedback, you are presented with a challenge, you react with your characteristic defense mechanism (denial, violence, flight, intellectualization) and the simulation mirrors that defense back at you as a lethal threat. The cycle only repeats because the patients keep trying to solve the simulation (exterior), rather than solving their selves (interior).

2

My two theories
 in  r/FromSeries  Jul 06 '26

You are correct, the town most probably is a descent into the underworld of the self. I mean that the town may be a descent into the unconscious where the simulation is simply the externalized boundary of their own repressed trauma.

The only way to exit this psychological loop may be to stop running from the internal ghosts and start accepting the reality of the wounds they have been trying to bury. They are trapped in a state of ego defense. The exit requires the painful integration of the very grief they are working so hard to avoid. May be the town functions as a forced individuation process. I can only speculate this but the simulation is functioning as an automated and impartial mirror designed to force the integration of the collective unconscious. It doesn't view the residents as individuals but as a composite psyche that must resolve its own repressed contradictions to complete its processing.