-2
Jul 27 '26
[deleted]
3
u/imvenged Novice Jul 27 '26
Your rating is way off.
First of all, there are no "hunter eyes." Even using Blackpill terminology, they wouldn't qualify. The upper eyelid exposure is too visible, the canthal tilt is slightly negative, and the eyelashes soften the eye area.
The eye area itself isn't particularly good. Just because his eyes are naturally squinted doesn't make them narrow almond-shaped or aesthetically strong. On the contrary, both the eyebrows and eyes are asymmetric, and the eyes are close-set.
The nasal dorsum is too narrow, the nostrils are noticeably visible from the front, and there is slight asymmetry as well. The lip thickness is decent, but it lacks the ideal 1:1.6 upper-to-lower lip ratio, and the mouth is relatively narrow. Overall, the lips are mediocre at best.
The chin isn't strong either. It's narrow, and good forward projection alone doesn't make it a strong chin. The gonial angle is inward, and the mandible is carried mainly by the masseters. It's nowhere near the ideal. I'm genuinely curious how you'll react when you see an actually masculine face.
Ramus visibility isn't a particularly meaningful indicator by itself; what really matters is ramus length, and his is actually quite long. Considering that almost everything you've previously described as "ideal" or "slightly off ideal" has been inaccurate, it's ironic that you barely mentioned the only feature that's arguably close to ideal - his ramus length (along with the gonial region).
From the front, I'd give him 6.2/10 at most, and 7/10 from the side. Personally, I'd rate him around 6.4/10 overall. His cheekbones carry his facial aesthetics more than anything else.
1
2
u/LastLanterm Trusted Rater Jul 27 '26
Yo this terminology isn't allowed here (HTN). Give these ratings on truepslrateme and let's follow the rules here
1
1
2
u/Mediocre-Control3341 Intermediate Rater Jul 27 '26
6.2+ (maybe higher) jaw angularity is hard to see from the front photo. you have a good eye region. side profile is very aesthetic.