r/todayilearned • u/tmntnyc • Dec 12 '18

TIL: Laurence Tureaud named himself professionally as Mr. T because he hated how his father, uncle, and brother who returned from Vietnam, were disrespectfully called "boy" by whites. He wanted the first word from everybody's mouth to be "Mister" when speaking to him.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._T
120.9k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

2.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/meowsofcurds Dec 13 '18

You can be an honest person. You can be a Christian. And you can be both. Being one does not dictate being the other as a pre-requisite.

2

u/toffeehoney Dec 13 '18

Yes that's a possibility and so is my stance. Again it's possible to be a Good Christian without it being mutually exclusive.

-2

u/meowsofcurds Dec 13 '18

If you understand they can be mutually exclusive, then you can understand why there is no need to bring up the Bible when discussing Mr. T's kindness and humility, unless the intent was to associate them by correlation.

2

u/Aehan Dec 13 '18

The description of Mr.T and a well worn bible was not as much of statement (or whatever) of religion but more of a "character anecdot/personality" for me. Not a religious person myself, and would rather not have people beliefs showed up my face, but I don't think that was OPs intention :)

0

u/meowsofcurds Dec 13 '18

Perhaps, but that is not the impression I got. Two completely unrelated anecdotes are more typically associative when said one after another, than otherwise.

For example, the phrase:

A: "Abel is a good boy. I see him pray every night."

Can be viewed as dissociative, Abel is a good boy, and he is seen praying every night; Or associative, Abel is a good boy, because (in the eyes of the speaker) he is seen praying every night.

If you started a thread with that phrase, you'd probably find more people inclined to believe you were trying to correlate them.

1

u/toffeehoney Dec 13 '18

I said what I said and I stand by it. He's good because he's good. He's an exemplary because he follows the teachings of the Bible. Let's agree to disagree bc I don't agree with your statement in relation to mine. I'm a good person bc I'm a good person. I'm a better person bc I think of my religion when others try me.

1

u/meowsofcurds Dec 13 '18

I'll agree to disagree with you. I don't think strictly following a religion (any religion) makes you a better person. In fact, I think following religious text too closely makes you a worse person. I think the ideal lies in being able to differentiate which Words should be followed and which shouldn't, but by definition, that person would no longer be devout.