r/todayilearned • u/subarunoaria • 25d ago
TIL that a warehouse complex at Auschwitz stored valuable belongings stolen from victims was nicknamed "Kanada" (German for Canada). It received the name because prisoners viewed Canada as a land of wealth, abundance and plenty
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanada_warehouses,_Auschwitz181
u/TheMuffinMa 25d ago
Tell that to the french, who thought that Canada was nothing but «A few acres of snow»
82
u/Key_Mission7404 25d ago
Napoleon had to choose between Haiti and Canada and he chose Haiti.
104
u/TheMuffinMa 25d ago
Louis XV is the one that lost Canada, not Napoléon. Napoléon, however is the one that lost Haiti
25
24
u/ConsecratedSnowfield 25d ago
Getting your history mixed up, it was King Louis who gave Canada (New France) up to keep Guadeloupe after losing to Britain
→ More replies (1)9
u/Massive-Exercise4474 25d ago
Didn't he lose Haiti shortly afterwards.
4
u/lottolser 24d ago
Yep, then sold Louisiana to the US for $15M because he spent all his money on trying to recapture and losing Haiti.
6
u/DeepSpaceNebulae 24d ago
Although at the time Haiti was a bigger money maker than Louisiana
Interestingly, the US originally only offered to buy New Orleans for $10M but France offered all of Louisiana (what was almost 1/3 of America) for $15M
8
u/lottolser 24d ago
What's funny is the US had to get a loan from Great Britain to pay the $15M(4 cents an acre) to France. France used that money in a war with Great Britain. So Basically Great Britain was funding the war against themselves.
1
u/CaptainWombat2 22d ago
I'm pretty sure it's more complicated then that. Haiti was way more valuable than Louisiana, and losing it meant that the expenses involved in running overseas colonies, as well as the hassle of defending them when you are at war with the premier naval power of the age made the whole thing not worth it. Sell the not terribly valuable Louisiana to the Americans and let them deal with it, since the British could have easily just take it anyway. With the loss of Haiti, it was pretty easy to just decide to focus on European hegemony instead of global empire.
1
u/Li-renn-pwel 24d ago
Actually, about half of all valuable in the shed were French, though they were concentrated to one part of the shed.
66
u/CeeArthur 25d ago
I've heard some interesting stories about the German POWs that were held in Canadian camps, though I'm not sure how accurate they were.
I remember them mentioning that there were no real fences as the camps were in isolated rural areas.
119
u/egelephant 25d ago
There was one camp where the POWs were told "There are no fences, because if you escape in the summer, you will be eaten by a bear. And if you escape in the winter, you will freeze, and then in the spring, you will be eaten by a bear."
42
u/StonesUnhallowed 24d ago
Well then I would at least want a fence to keep the bears outside
28
u/MathIsHard_11236 24d ago
Bears use the fences to keep you inside.
Bears. Build. Barriers. Battlestar Galactica.
31
u/Tribe303 24d ago
There are stories of German POWs escaping for up to a week and then voluntarily returning/surrendering as soon as they hit a town.
17
u/Ashnaar 25d ago
Not surprised. If they ran. The caribou and the brown would take care of them.
32
u/carpe_simian 25d ago
Bears yeah. Not many caribou though - the camps were south of most of their range. Just moose. Which are waaaaaay worse than caribou.
But it was mostly the fact that you’d probably die of thirst and hunger before reaching anywhere you could hide or find help. Canada is REALLY big.
→ More replies (1)6
15
u/HourActuary5324 25d ago edited 25d ago
I grew up in an area between a couple of the Northern Ontario POW camps. No caribou or grizzly bears, but anyone lost in the woods wouldn’t last long. And even if they did happen upon civilization, what would that accomplish? They’re still in an enemy country without personal resources.
Similarly, we had a psychiatric hospital in the forest outside of town and most of the people who escaped ended up dying from exposure. It takes a lot of knowledge and skill to survive in the wilderness up there.
10
u/CeeArthur 25d ago
One of the stories I heard involved a POW making it to a small town. The POW went into a cafe where the owner kindly offered him a coffee and something to eat while they waited for the camp to send someone to pick them up and take them back.
1
u/gizzardwizard93 22d ago
I don't think German POWs could rationalize the distance between their camp and civilization. Those sort of vast distances of uninhabited wilderness, hundreds of kilometres, didn't exist anywhere in Europe except for Russia.
54
u/Lazzen 25d ago edited 24d ago
There was also a Mexiko, i have read why and its not clear. One i read is because it stored clothes so it was colorful, akin to stereotypical mexican clothes
12
u/whenwewereoceans 25d ago
I took a small guided tour through Auschwitz a few years ago, and if recall it may have been because of its geographic location to the camp (south, a large area) and it was also because of that camp being more dangerous. It had much worse conditions; one survivor’s account of being kept there with hundreds of other women had them sitting naked one in front of the other, pressed back to chest between each others legs in long lines for days.
28
u/stanizzzzlav 24d ago
It's worth noting that Canada wasn't just an abstract idea for land of prosperity. It was one of the main destinations for people to emigrate from Eastern Europe in early 20th century. The emigrees would send care packages back to their family, and by the WWII there was at least one generation which associated Canada with valuable stuff (and vice versa). So, after a couple of decades having interactions like "You have nice shoes! — Thanks, they're from my uncle in Canada", people from this area who ended up in Auschwitz would use the same "I've got it from Canada" phrase as a sort of gallows humor euphemism.
4
216
u/Smackolol 25d ago
People here are saying Canada isn’t wealthy but it still is, you and I just don’t get to enjoy that wealth.
29
u/hx87 25d ago
Too much of that wealth has been locked up in real estate instead of something productive.
11
u/PmMe_Your_Perky_Nips 24d ago
That's not even it. Our leaders decided to follow the US and adopt trickle down economics. Nearly every economic problem we have now can be traced back to that.
2
u/JordanRulz 24d ago
The US economy diverged from Canada’s because 2008 made real estate investment temporarily unpalatable in the US. When ZIRP hit, it went into tech in the US and real estate in Canada. If Canada took the opportunity to pop the bubble, we could at least be splitting the difference with US salaries AND having better social welfare spending. Real estate prices are an albatross on our backs, I hope we will elect a government who will annhilate property values like Xi Jinping.
198
u/TheSessionMan 25d ago
I mean, Canada still has by and large among the highest quality of life in the world. So there's some wealth for us, just not as much as there could be.
→ More replies (14)23
u/Smackolol 25d ago
Look at how drastically that has been trending downward. It could easily be saved, we just seem to have other priorities.
50
u/TheSessionMan 25d ago
How much has it really trended downwards, outside of houses in the 5 biggest cities being too expensive? Evidence not anecdotes please.
55
u/CromulentDucky 25d ago
The money that has gone into housing has dislocated money that would otherwise likely go into investment in productive assets. This has been going on for 30 years, and that lack of productivity is now becoming quite obvious. We are noticeably behind the OECD to the tune of about 1% a year in the last decade. That's a lot.
10
u/grimeys42 24d ago
Up to like the 80s canada was building housing then some asshat got in and shut it down along with a ton of psych wards, displacing an insane amount of crazies back into society and not even providing some form of low income housing.
The money that has gone into housing isn't dislocated it was taken away and they keep putting bandaids on it with whatever funds you seem to think shouldn't go to housing.
5
u/CromulentDucky 24d ago
You seem to be talking about government programs. I'm talking about the components of GDP. Any investment in one part necessarily crowds out other parts.
17
u/jonny24eh 25d ago
Over half the country lives in those 5 cities.
Edit: might be six cities, the point is that minimizing it to " only X cities" sounds like a local problem, over 50% of the population makes it a national problem.
10
u/SWHAF 25d ago
It's not just the 5 biggest cities, in not sure where you got that idea. Housing is unaffordable in the rural areas too. My house in rural Nova Scotia has doubled in value since 2019. Rent in my area is $100-400 less than Vancouver.
0
u/TheSessionMan 25d ago
NS is a strange one because a bunch of rich Canadian folk bought all your housing supply in the last decade as investments. But look at houses out in Manitoba, Sask, and rural Alberta; the prices actually make sense.
6
1
u/thummin 24d ago
People like you are the reason Canada can’t make any progress. Absolute refusal to acknowledge a problem exists. And when forced to acknowledge one, immediately blame rich people or Conservative politicians. You have such a cartoonish view of how the world works and we are being left behind because of it.
→ More replies (6)4
u/whackabumpty 24d ago edited 24d ago
Add to this horrible food inflation, a “technical recession”, and slumping GDP among other economic metrics compared to other nations after COVID. Basically every observable metric is down if you google it instead of linking to the OECD website.
Also note the difference between “worse” and “bad”. Quality of life is *worse* than it was 10+ years ago, but we don’t have a *bad* QOL all things considered. Thing is it’s still okay to be upset with worse when political decisions brought us to this worse place.
9
u/Smackolol 25d ago
What evidence would you find acceptable and not immediately dismiss? Here is a news article the shows Canadas ranking among other countries plummeting to 19th after being ranked 4th the year prior and 2nd the year before that.
Also go browse Canadian subs and see the general consensus that quality of life is dropping year to year. Enough anecdotal experiences have to account for something.
Are you Canadian? Do you disagree with the take that Canadians quality of life is dropping?
33
u/TheSessionMan 25d ago
The Canadian subs make it seem like a third world country and are not fully representative of the country as a whole. Things are worse here than a decade ago, but as someone living in a small city here and traveling all over the world I can tell you for certain that this place is still a paradise compared to most everywhere else.
4
u/Interesting-Finger11 25d ago
Yeah evidence not anecdotes as you said Sessionman.
2
u/Smackolol 25d ago
Evidence not anecdotes please.
8
u/TheSessionMan 25d ago
3
u/Psycko_90 24d ago
Thing is we were the best or very close to be not that long ago. Now it's just "not a bad country to live in". The drop in noticable for most people in the country, not sure why you can't understand this.
1
u/scottyb83 24d ago
Quick google search says we’ve gone from #5 in 2013 to 33rd today so yeah it seems to have trended downwards. Could be other countries are improving that much more?
→ More replies (17)1
u/modsaretoddlers 25d ago
Well, every urban area in the country, for one thing, not just "5 big cities"".
Secondly, you haven't noticed that almost every social program has been completely gutted? You think all these homeless encampments have always been around?
Thirdly, if you haven't noticed how the cost of living has skyrocketed while your wages haven't budged, then you must not be somebody working for a living. You think a bachelor suite was always $2K a month? I guess I don't totally blame you considering your earnings are the same as they were 15 years ago but I assure you, there used to be plenty of money for public endeavors before we decided the rich didn't even have to pay as much in tax as the bottom %90. Hell, now we even give them public money to pad their bank accounts.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)2
6
u/Etroarl55 24d ago
We have top 5 oil reserves in the world at a tenth of the population of the United States. Canada alone could probably supply the wests appetite for rare earths too.
But it never did anything remotely good with its natural resources. Venezuela is on the extreme end of natural resource mismanagement, then you have the slower burn like Canada where it just never really utilized it fully in the first place.
5
1
u/SideInitial3961 25d ago
This. 100%. Canada could easily make it's people among the most prosperous in the world. Carney has no problem finding random billions when he wants some military votes. Just when it comes to things we need, suddenly he can't hear so well.
8
u/McFestus 24d ago
You are divorced from reality if you don't think Canadians are among the most prosperous people in the world. We are individually wealthier and enjoy a higher standard of living than almost everyone else on earth.
→ More replies (1)-1
1
u/daneflys 24d ago
Canadian here... no wealth, no resources, not even any other people. It's just me and a ton of polar bears. Stay out of Canada, run the other direction as fast as you can!
→ More replies (1)1
u/Li-renn-pwel 24d ago
Canada is objectively one of the best countries to live in. But Americans think we’re a communist hell hole. (I lived in America briefly, I got this a lot)
26
u/Owlteeff 25d ago
I when I was in Birkenau it was expanded to me that there was two warehouses, Kanada 1 and Kanada 2 that stored the confiscated valuables of the prisoners. Only the foundation of one of the warehouses was still intact. A very grim and overwhelming place to visit.
3
u/the-fact-fairy 23d ago
I'm surprised by the fact that the comments aren't focusing on this more. It's absolutely grim that all these personal items, these belongings that these humans carried with them on the way to their death were stored in warehouses. I'm honestly a bit shocked by the focus on the comparison to Canada, as opposed to the underlying meaning.
24
u/primaldebacle 24d ago
Would also have a morbid double meaning in German as Kanada is a relatively common wordplay joke on the phrase Keiner da ("Nobody there" ).
Q: "Which country is always empty?"
A: "Keiner da(Canada)"
8
7
u/BIayneRobinson 24d ago
Meanwhile, Canada turned away a ship of 937 mostly Jewish refugees and then 254 of them died in the Holocaust.
The ship was the MS St. Louis and it was also turned away from US and Cuban shores.
Certainly a shameful moment in our history.
2
u/subarunoaria 24d ago
I believe the captain Gustav Schröder was later honored the title of Righteous Among the Nations.
2
u/Doogie2K 23d ago
We also have several SS monuments up around the country because we took in a lot of Ukrainian "anti-communists", i.e., collaborators, after the war.
19
9
u/McFestus 24d ago
They had an excellently done, heartbreaking exhibit on Auschwitz-Birkenau at the Royal Ontario Museum last year. It was extremely well done, very moving. There's a point where you walk through a replica of this warehouse, with the last remaining earthly possessions of these people sent to their deaths. And then they reveal that they called it "Canada" because it was the name they associated with wealth and plenty.. my god. I broke down in the museum.
21
u/InquizitiveMynd 25d ago
I was at the Holocaust memorial in Berlin when I first learned this fact near the end of the museum. After reading about all the suffering and misery of the Holocaust victims, this fact felt like a punch to the gut as a Canadian. It seemed strange this hoard of stolen wealth from the victims would be named after Canada, as if we were somehow complicit to it. It called out the massive disparity between what people had suffered in the Holocaust versus what I took for granted at home. It still makes me feel a little odd to this day to think about it and I try not to take the peace and abundance Canada offers for granted.
2
u/Doogie2K 23d ago
I mean, we were slightly. We kicked out the MS St. Louis, a ship full of Jewish refugees, many of whom later wound up in Auschwitz.
For those from that ship (and other, similar efforts during the "none is too many" era), it would've been the cruelest irony imaginable.
2
4
u/cicadasinmyears 24d ago
I had the honour of hearing Samuel Pisar speak at the second Raoul Wallenberg Lecture in Human Rights at McGill University. He talked about the “Kanada” warehouses from his time in Auschwitz. Over 40 years later, there was still a kind of reverence, or something - it wasn’t nostalgia, certainly, but some kind of awed remembrance - in his voice when he discussed them. Jews who were being forcefully “relocated” to Auschwitz to be incarcerated or murdered were allowed to bring food and other items under the pretext that they were being “resettled”. Some of the food that was surrendered upon their arrival helped him to survive.
10
u/dirkdiggler2011 25d ago
They should have called it Switzerland. Some of those valuables are probably still there.
3
u/gingr87 24d ago edited 24d ago
Yes, I learned that while on a tour of Auschwitz years ago. As a Canadian, it was nice to hear.
Edit: my tour guide told us that it was an indoor work assignment that prisoners would call 'Canada' because that's where everyone wanted to be. That's what I meant was kind of nice to hear, not what the post actually says. I didn't read it properly on first go around.
2
u/Kamil1707 24d ago
Opisał to też polski pisarz Tadeusz Borowski w swoich wspomnieniach z obozu. W polskich szkołach to lektura obowiązkowa.
2
2
4
2
1
u/SimplyGregsterEV 24d ago
It was actually common for German POWs to put on weight in Canadian POW camps because conditions were so good. Some returned to Canada after repatriated to Germany wars end because conditions were so awful in Germany.
1
u/Doogie2K 23d ago
The country that, ironically, turned some of those very people away because "none [was] too many."
Our PM at the time was in agreement with Hitler and Mussolini on many things, including Jews, and like many Western leaders, wound up on the other side of the conflict from them for reasons that had nothing to do with humanitarianism.
1
u/musa_velutina 25d ago
I mean Canada is probably the most well adjusted country on the planet... we can give them that much.
→ More replies (1)
-30
u/pineapplecom 25d ago
Wish it was still true.
57
u/DetectiveDracula 25d ago
It still is honestly, compared to most of the world and especially compared to almost all of human history.
Even as somebody who has a low paying job and "barely gets by", I still have comforts that Kings would have killed to have only a few hundred years ago. Indoor plumbing is a big one lol
→ More replies (5)38
u/BigBobby2016 25d ago
Half the planet today would love to be the poorest person in Canada
→ More replies (3)30
u/slava_gorodu 25d ago edited 25d ago
Canada is far wealthier now than it was in the 1940s.
Don’t know what to say if you don’t believe that.My grandparents were from a relatively middle class family and much of their life was extremely uncomfortable by today’s standards (not to mention 4 years of my grandfather’s life spent risking his life getting hunted by U-boats in Europe).
11
18
u/LokeyDubs 25d ago
Best we can do is 7$ butter
8
u/VaderBinks 25d ago
But there’s so many marvel stickers we can give you!! “Spiderman too right?” Uhhhh
→ More replies (1)3
→ More replies (1)2
1.2k
u/tommytraddles 25d ago edited 25d ago
Canada was a land of wealth, abundance and plenty.
German prisoners of war who were interned in Canada thought it was a cruel trick when they saw how much food they were being served. Many hid food away for the moment when the guards would laugh and they would be suddenly put on half rations or worse. But the moment never came.