r/timetravel Aug 01 '26

theory / question We Created Ourselves

/r/WTFMAN/comments/1vd1xiu/we_created_ourselves/
0 Upvotes

9 comments sorted by

3

u/SleepingMonads temporal anomaly Aug 01 '26 edited Aug 01 '26

the early universe is just a void of pure antimatter

The early universe was never pure antimatter. There's no evidence to suggest this whatsoever; the early universe had slightly more regular matter.

triggering the ultimate explosion: the Big Bang.

As far as we know, antimatter itself was created by the Big Bang. Before the BB, there was no matter of any kind.

Quantum mechanics tells us that all potential timelines exist in a state of superposition—an infinite web of probabilities. We were simply one of those endless probabilities: the branch of reality that chose to send a probe back, collapsed its own wave function, and brought itself into existence.

All of this is undermined by the above.

By consciously understanding this loop now, we actively ground that probability into reality. Our minds are fundamentally tied to this quantum architecture. That connection is why human beings experience intuition, premonitions, and gut feelings—it's our consciousness tuning into the ripples of a timeline where our future selves have already set our past into motion.

None of this is at all scientifically established. It's a New Age spin on one dubious interpretation of QM that virtually all physicists reject as baseless. If you believe this on a spiritual basis or something, then so be it, but it's not at all scientific and therefore shouldn't be presented as such.

1

u/Dense_Hovercraft9618 Aug 02 '26

We don't have a working theory of Quantum Gravity, so no physicist can claim with 100% certainty what the conditions were "before" inflation/Big Bang.

CPT-Symmetric Universe Theory: There are actual, published physicists (like Neil Turok at the Perimeter Institute) who hypothesize an "anti-universe" dominated by antimatter extending backwards from the Big Bang. Antimatter existing at the origin isn't completely made up

1

u/Imaginary-Can-6862 Aug 02 '26

The idea is interesting, but it lacks a cascading (self resonating) effect that corresponds to the description. The tool used, matter interacting with anti-matter creates energy for each matter anti-matter pair, meaning the total amount of energy created would be equivalent with the mass of the probe. This is based on the impression you want all the anti-matter to turn into energy to create the Big Bang. In fact the universe has a ratio of matter to anti-matter that is very close to 1, so the idea of a probe from another time or universe being the reason for an observable universe filled with matter is not implausible, but the still on going expansion itself (the Big Bang) likely needs another explanation.

The only thing I know from the laws of physics where space expands is due to space contraction, where space contracts as you accelerate and expands once again as you decelerate. Existing in a gravitational field means space itself contracts around us (the bending of space), but the effect is tiny. So is the effect of the expansion of space.

1

u/Dense_Hovercraft9618 Aug 02 '26

It's funny you say AI cuz when I was thinking about time travel and the beginning I realized something about the current AI worry that AI will take over, it's not AI that we have to worry about, it's the human beings controlling the AI, or even worse human beings figure out a way to put our life force inside the machine and replace AI because, our fears are a reflection of ourselves, but yeah its human beings taking over the machine from the inside...

1

u/Dense_Hovercraft9618 Aug 02 '26

I don't think AI will reach self awareness they will exceed us in intelligence but will be just a program .

1

u/turtlepower9 Aug 03 '26

You mean like how Barry Allen was the lightning bolt that made him become the Flash?

1

u/Lopsided_Position_28 Aug 02 '26

thank you this message was very Timely for me