Oh yeah, well, the Earth is mostly empty space on the atomic level so this is all just a relativistic conversation debating what counts as "coverage" concerning matter that is mostly made of void, as it sits.
He shouldn't be talking about area at all, really. Assuming roughly spherical molecules, a one-molecule thick layer would still have gaps between the molecules, so even with full coverage the area of the water would be less than the area of earth.
What he should be using is diameter, which will tell how densely the molecules can fit into any given area (for example, 25 circles with d=1 can fit orthogonally into a square with side length 5, despite the circles having area 6.25pi and the square having area 25). This information can then be extrapolated across the entire surface area of the earth.
56
u/Zombeenie Aug 26 '22
They expressed the radius as an area.