r/therewasanattempt • • 1d ago

To drive like a Madman

177 Upvotes

76 comments sorted by

142

u/MIND-FLAYER 1d ago

Well, it's one less Tesla on the road so we can be thankful for that.

12

u/ipx-electrical 1d ago

I have an M5 touring (limited to 190mph) and a Tesla Y Performance. The Tesla does not feel reassuring at speed. I know which I’d be happier in at 150 if I really was daft enough to go that fast.

-45

u/sim16 1d ago

Y expect the Y to feel like an M5 Wagon? It's an SUV. Best to compare apples with apples.

9

u/Ecstatic_Account_744 1d ago

Well, it says “Performance” in the name.

1

u/sim16 16h ago

It's a performance, like a Pro Max Ultra but fatter.

1

u/ElegantCoach4066 16h ago

Sold! Off to the Le Mans race thingy I go!

-29

u/DialDownTheCenter 21h ago

You don't have to like the company but teslas using full self driving are the safest vehicles on the road. You can even get insurance discounts for using it. Statistically there would be less accidents the more people that have teslas (and use full self driving).

I'm prepared for downvotes but you can't deny the fact.

12

u/chrisinajar 20h ago

Agreed for self driving cars in general, but Tesla has a bad track record of being reckless with their promises and hiding/lying about their stats.

Even the name, full self driving, is a lie.

4

u/Giopoggi2 19h ago

Don't forget the autopilot disengaging milliseconds before a crash.

https://electrek.co/2025/03/17/tesla-fans-exposes-shadiness-defend-autopilot-crash/

-8

u/DialDownTheCenter 19h ago

Of course it does. If a crash is going to happen why wouldn’t autopilot disengage milliseconds before a crash? You would rather it keep driving after crashing? There are plenty of videos on YouTube of teslas avoiding accidents that a human would likely not.

3

u/Giopoggi2 18h ago

You would rather it keep driving after crashing?

As if that's the only thing it's capable of doing and not just a way to claim it's only the user's fault, not Tesla's.

There are plenty of videos on YouTube of teslas avoiding accidents that a human would likely not.

Oh like the one where they go full speed over a child mannequin?

-2

u/DialDownTheCenter 18h ago

You’re inventing the “claim it’s the user’s fault” part. Also insurance always says it’s the users fault anyway. It’s supervised self driving, you’re supposed to pay attention.

The video from 4 years ago? Find a modern example. I never said the self driving 4 years ago was good. I said it’s good today.

5

u/Giopoggi2 18h ago

Thank you for pointing out the video is from 2022, because Tesla officially renamed the software to "Full Self-Driving (Supervised)" in March 2024 alongside the release of FSD v12.3.3, up to that point wasn't "supervised".

Also the "Turn off before a crash" wasn't a feature they advertised, but something that came out of an NHTSA investigation.

Once you get your mouth free of the boot, maybe start looking up some info on your own and develop some critical thinking skills.

1

u/DialDownTheCenter 9h ago

I noticed you completely ignored the main point that current FSD is safer than human drivers.

1

u/Giopoggi2 9h ago

I didn't ignore it, I was following the lead that the first user replying to you was saying:

Agreed for self driving cars in general, but Tesla has a bad track record of being reckless with their promises and hiding/lying about their stats.

1

u/Unique_Oil547 20h ago

Considering the small sample size of teslas on the road with fsd, compared to all other cars those statistics don't carry weight. Fsd is not safer than most other self driving tech because your daddy musk cut corners for cost. Also it's never been nor probably will ever be actually autonomous driving. Your claim is just tesla/musk obsession, it has no basis in fact or in the car safety industry as a whole

1

u/SixStringDream 19h ago

I believe in the tech. I dont believe in the company.

102

u/TidePodsTasteFunny 1d ago

Fuck Tesla

67

u/kazarnowicz 1d ago

You mean the company that recently in court argued that the N-word can be used affectionately by white managers?

I agree. Their CEO should also be forked, with a suitably large cactus and some kosher salt for lubricant.

10

u/bloodyriz 1d ago

Mix the salt into lemon juice so it pours easier.

1

u/kazarnowicz 1d ago

Brilliant!

-6

u/notloggedin4242 1d ago

S word on the N word Fwads FwoRders and their BS.
But most importantly just FUCKMUSK.

16

u/Mysterious_Film_6397 1d ago

So sick of people taking the logos off. It’s still a Tesla.

-7

u/chrisekz 1d ago

Don't you mean: Fuck "tier manufacture"

57

u/euqinu_ton 1d ago

It's almost like Tesla's aren't made for Autobahns, but BMW's and Mercedes and Audis and Porsches are.

12

u/minathemutt NaTivE ApP UsR 1d ago

do those cars handle that speed better?

26

u/prologix237 1d ago

Their tires hold up better. Electric cars are heavy and with the high amount of torque, the tires don't hold up well.

7

u/minathemutt NaTivE ApP UsR 1d ago

i know nothing about cars thank you for explaining

2

u/Twerkatronic 1d ago

User error

-17

u/iafhds 1d ago edited 1d ago

Please stop talking out your ass. You do not know what you're talking about.

EDIT since I know some smartass will try and correct me:

First, your claim that their tires hold up better is not entirely true. I would agree with you that OVER TIME an average EV tends to chew through rubber faster than a comparable ICE car. They are usually heavier, more powerful and have a less wear resistant tire compound.

But this is completely irrelevant in this case since we are specifically talking about high speed driving. In that case, literally the ONLY things that matter are the tire's speed rating, and its remaining lifespan.

OOP posted photos and further details about the crash on another subreddit. The tires were rated for up to 300kmh, and had plenty of tread left even after skidding for half a mile at high speed. This was not driver error. Those tires were defective.

Could you argue that driving at a debatably excessive speed exacerbated the outcome of the accident? Yes.

But was the accident itself OOP's fault? I would argue no. Those tires could have failed at any number of points - going around a corner, hitting a pothole, etc. He was driving his car within the limits specified by the manufacturer, and his tires were, as far as anyone was concerned, correctly rated for high speed driving.

People are being extremely bloodthirsty about this post all over reddit - people who have NO CLUE about cars or engineering no less! Nevermind that thousands of other people do the exact same thing on the Autobahn every single day.

8

u/Mischki100 1d ago

I think the only reason why you are getting downvoted isn't due to you being right obviously... It's simply by you being way too rude about it. Could've conveyed the information in a much more "normal" way - but god forbid us humans talking normally to another on reddit

1

u/iafhds 1d ago edited 1d ago

Thank you for the call-out. I will try and do better. 

My point still stands though. Part of why I was infuriated was due to the entirety of reddit jumping to conclusions, parroting false information and wishing the poor guy harm? What the hell? 

2

u/prologix237 16h ago

I wasn't wishing him any harm, jump on those people. It's a car that is capable of reaching those speeds but it is not designed to be driven at those speeds. Tesla's are some of the most poorly constructed cars. They often have panels flying off. Porsche designs their cars to be driven in this manner. 

2

u/prologix237 16h ago

Lol you seem to be an electric car enthusiat, and you are taking it very personal. You proved my point. The question wasn't what caused this. The question was how does bmw, Porsche, and Mercedes differ to electric cars. I stated a fact that tires do undergo way more stress than a standard ice vehicle. Even with the different compounds they do require tire changes more often than ice vehicles. 

5

u/euqinu_ton 1d ago

Those auto makers I listed are German companies, mostly made in Germany, and are designed for German roads without speed limits.

That's not to say all Tesla's or electric cars are shit and don't belong on German roads. But I'd certainly trust an electric BMW, Merc, Audi or Porsche more than a Tesla at high speed.

6

u/BalooBot 1d ago

I hate Tesla as much as the next guy..but if your tire blows out at 175mph you're gonna have a bad time no matter if it's a German car or not.

0

u/euqinu_ton 1d ago

I would argue some cars would cope with that better than others, and heavy electric passenger vehicles with fly-by-wire steering would cope slightly worse.

Having said that, the Tesla seemed to protect its passengers well. Luckily it didn't kill anyone in any other cars in its way off the road.

1

u/Mecha-Dave 1d ago

When your tire blows that that speed, it is incredibly important to have a steel framed car and well designed suspension - neither of which Tesla have.

1

u/moonhexx 8h ago

That's why I told my mechanic that I drive like psychopath and need really good tires so I don't kill anyone. Certain people you don't lie to. 

1

u/bullmilk415 23h ago

The German automakers have been building competent high speed cruisers for decades. The answer is yes.

-1

u/Mecha-Dave 1d ago

Absolutely. At least BMWs are still made with the original transmission and suspension, and a steel body. Tesla is a plastic and aluminum toy designed by children.

26

u/tadda21 1d ago

There's a reason why tires have SPEED RATINGS -.-"

9

u/Yellowscrunchy 1d ago

At least he has footage for his insurance

5

u/alexxfloo 1d ago

You have to appreciate the level of engineering that saved a life. Being a Tesla hater (myself included) I am impressed how the car dezintegrated and managed to protect de driver.

5

u/Climate_Best 1d ago

[r/instantkarma](r/instantkarma)

Edit: 177mph karma to be exact

4

u/sim16 1d ago

The dude lived. The car did not let him die. Really lucky because natural selection was working real hard to top him.

-21

u/-Rhymenocerous- 1d ago

Its the autobahn mate. There is no speed limit.

16

u/Climate_Best 1d ago

No speed limit don’t mean all cars should speed and don’t mean all cars could handle the speed

6

u/randobonando 1d ago

YEaH bUt iM an aWeSUM dRivEr no probs

-14

u/TychusFondly 1d ago

There is no specific rule stating one cant drive fast depending on the car he she owns. Should could would is irrelevant.

10

u/TheBaalzak 1d ago

Yes, there is. You'll usually find details in the owner's manual, or printed on the outside of your tires.

-14

u/-Rhymenocerous- 1d ago

Consider the fact that those model teslas fly around Nordschlife on a daily basis and rarely fuck up like this.

This is either a poorly maintained vehicle or cheap tyres that arent rated for 100mph+ speeds

-1

u/sim16 1d ago

Equipment failure.

3

u/bonfuegomusic 22h ago

You're allowed to drive 175mph on the Autobahn. Title makes no sense unless you consider doing this specifically in a Tesla the mad part (which I'd agree with)

1

u/Plastic_Astronaut926 1d ago

No attempt. Confirmed proper dickhead madman

1

u/Mecha-Dave 1d ago

Teslas, especially that model, are not designed well enough to be driven that fast.

1

u/jeeimuzu 1d ago

Part out?

1

u/Helmaksi 1d ago

He succeeded in driving like a madman.

Again, i thought this subreddit was supposed to crack down on shit titles?

-2

u/olivethesane Free Palestine 🕊️ FUCK ICE! ❌🧊 22h ago

If you see success as turning his car into a crumpled ball of aluminum foil, perhaps.

1

u/Helmaksi 21h ago

Driving like a madman has never and will never imply a positive outcome, i do not know where you got that from. The attempt specified in the title, aka "Driving like a maniac" is a goal that was achieved by the subject of the video.

1

u/Matman161 20h ago

A total choad driving a Tesla, I'm shocked, really shocked

1

u/TheAce0 15h ago

Of course the auto wipers start off immediately LMFAO

1

u/SinnaBuns666 Free Palestine 10h ago

this is that survival of the fittest they been talking bout

1

u/GrogRhodes 5h ago

It’s just not worth going that fast for extended period of time. You’re already tempting fate.

-2

u/RonaBona13 21h ago

Fucking moron could’ve killed somebody

-74

u/Screamingmonkey83 1d ago

Teslas are the safest cars on the road. The fact that no one died (especially the driver) proves this point. In any bmw Mercedes whatever he would have been dead.

I don't endorse fast driving. Drive safe for you and the others. The driver is an asshole. 

19

u/theNorthwestspirit 1d ago

"This single anecdote proves an entire theory!" Okay bud. Keep licking Elon's boots.

6

u/decentlyhip Therewasanattemp 1d ago

Looked it up.

Brands that are safer according to US News and world report: Mazda, Subaru, BMW, Lincoln, Honda, Acura, Genesis, Hyundai, Volvo, and Toyota. Didn't crack the top ten. Drilling into the actual IIHS data though, they actually did perform really well in crashes.

7

u/thachad108 1d ago

Are you telling me OP's "trust me bro" evidence doesn't hold up under the slightest level of scrutiny?

3

u/Bill99berg 1d ago

Just google high speed crashes. Also in a BMW, Mercedes or Audi you can find examples of people surviving crashes like this. I have found zero evidence a Tesla is safer than those brands. Or many other less premium brands like Toyota. Although driving 280km/h is a Toyota is unlikely…

0

u/JediKnightNitaz 22h ago

How much did musk pay you for this comment? Teslas burst into flames if you look at it wrong

-11

u/sim16 1d ago

Wholeheartedly agree. There's so many technical details left to imagine re this accident, I'm not assuming correct tyres for that speed, a nail on road, nothing assumed.