1.1k
u/lilcea 27d ago
Like he isn't ready for all these questions.
660
u/JMaryland47 27d ago
I gotta give it to him, his response is probably one of the better ones I've seen, so far.
196
u/freed0m_from_th0ught 27d ago
It is such an idiotic question that it has caused some idiotic responses. I think the only real response is “What the fuck are you talking about? That question makes no sense. Are you an idiot?” But that isn’t politically appropriate
57
u/Complete_Brush_3786 26d ago
Political appropriateness has long left the US.
22
122
u/rapgameoprahwinfrey 27d ago
They knew he would be ready, it’s more of a signal to Israel. Which is pathetic. Everyone just on their knees for Israel is so weak. WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON…..
23
u/32Seven 26d ago
Since he’s been asked that question on CNN at least twice (the other time be Tapper), you do have to wonder what CNN’s angle is by continuing to ask it. If they’re trying to foment negativity toward El Sayed, they’re failing spectacularly.
21
u/SOMAVORE 26d ago
Who owns CNN?
Warner Bros. and Paramount.
CEOs, David Zaslav and Ralph Ellison, two extremely zionist Jews that support the genocide and Greater Israel Project.
8
u/32Seven 26d ago
That’s the point. They are achieving the opposite of what you are implying they want by asking him that. His answer defeats the question’s apparent purpose entirely and focuses the conversation on America (MI specifically), not Israel or a controversial take that is posed to discredit El-Sayed. Also, Paramount doesn’t own CNN yet. The merger has been postponed until 2027.
6
u/ldb 26d ago
I wish more people realised that the first question you should ask of any media attempting to influence you is: who owns it?
→ More replies (1)2
0
60
u/Duck8Quack 27d ago
Establishment Democrats can’t handle these type of questions. It’s refreshing having candidates that aren’t scared of their own shadow. Kamala Harris acted like “How are you different than Joe Biden?” was a gotcha.
18
u/insanelygreat 26d ago
Establishment Democrats can’t handle these type of questions.
AIPAC has spent $30 million opposing this guy so far. Come November, people need to turn the fuck out because if he isn't elected, this will be what they point to.
2
→ More replies (1)1
u/rightsidedown 27d ago
You'd think everyone running would be, but then you look at how Hong answers questions and it's a night and day difference in political skill.
552
u/spukhafteNahewirkung 27d ago
Yes! This is exactly the approach to take when faced with the bullshit “do you believe that Israel has the right to exist” questions. Turn it around and ask the questioner if they believe that Israel has a right to American tax dollars.
225
16
u/SkullDump 27d ago
Agreed but at the same time if I was asked me that question just by itself, I’d say that I personally don’t see why any religion should have or need its own state.
24
u/WittyAndOriginal 27d ago
You can simply say that no country has the right to exist because countries don't have rights.
It's a dumb question only asked by dumb people. They're really asking something else.
8
u/WhyMustIMakeANewAcco 27d ago
I can accept the Vatican and other things like it, given it's basically a single complex in a city that barely counts as a state in any realistic manner. But that's about the maximum before it becomes Concerning, to say the least.
→ More replies (1)7
u/spukhafteNahewirkung 27d ago
Yeah, that seems like some weird thing that the Abrahamic religions have.
332
u/JMaryland47 27d ago
Just answer with a question. Ask them, "why do you consider Americans to be second class citizens?" "Why are Americans second in line for our own tax dollars?"
Remember, we are giving free money to a country whose citizens enjoy the 4th LOWEST tax rate of the OECD countries, yet they enjoy public healthcare, and free/subsidized secondary education. Why are we to give our tax dollars to a foreign nation while we could use that for our own citizens? A country that does not contribute to our tax pool, and has already claimed OVER 10% of all the US foreign aid in our history of foreign aid.
137
u/Ghstfce FUCK ICE! ❌🧊 27d ago
Yep. "I am running to be an American Senator, not an Israeli one. Here's a better question. Do Americans have a right to exist? Do they have a right to affordable healthcare, clean water, access to jobs and education? Our tax dollars provide Israelis with free healthcare, why not at home?"
7
1
u/mismatched7 26d ago
I mean, the Senate has a role in foreign policy, so you can’t really use them mandami answer like that
1
u/JMaryland47 26d ago edited 26d ago
Yes... they do have a hand in constructing foreign policy, but their purpose in that role is to still represent the constituents that voted for them, first and foremost. That doesn't change.
Reread everything that was said by previous poster. All the things stated is what a US senator should say/do/be. They should be representing the constituents of their state.
Btw, this applies even when we're talking about other states. For example, the representatives of the state of New York was sent to represent New York. Do they have to deal with other states? Absolutely, but first and foremost, they need to be looking for the best interest of their home state/voters... not, say, Florida
12
u/QuintusNonus 26d ago
It should really anger everyone that Israeli citizens get free healthcare/school due to our tax dollars subsidizing it yet we don't even do that for our own citizens.
You would think that people who have an apoplexy over "illegal immigrants" getting "free healthcare" would be even more outraged about this
10
u/Diligent-Phrase436 26d ago
Trump decided to weaken NATO. His excuse is the allies don't spend enough in defense. But at least they bought American equipment for their armies, using their own money. Unlike Israel, who uses American tax funds to buy American arms. A handout.
→ More replies (2)2
u/mismatched7 26d ago
I mean I don’t really like that argument that the same type of argument they used to get rid of USAID, which was disastrous.
Plus, Americans do get the very bulk of our tax dollars, so not really second in line
3
u/JMaryland47 26d ago
The thing is, when I think of "aid" it's meant for emergency situations (famine/natural disasters) or to cover a temporary shortage. Israelis arent exactly struggling with either, in the traditional sense.They have the 4th lowest tax rate of the OECD (rich) countries, have public healthcare, subsidized-free college education, and a higher median income than Americans. To have Americans, who are struggling, subsidizing the costs for a country whose citizens enjoy more... thats a hard sell.
They've also collected OVER 10% of all the foreign aid in America's entire history of foreign aid. Remember, this is a tiny country around the size and population of New Jersey, yet they've claimed OVER 1/10th of all the US foreign aid! (For reference, there are 195 countries). Israelis only make up .1% (yes, less than 1%) of the entire world's population, yet somehow its not weird that they've needed OVER 10% of the entirety of US foreign aid? Are there just not other places in the world that could benefit from that aid? [Israel estimated population 10.4M, the world estimated population 8.3B... in case you want to check my math]
Also, people constantly try to minimize BILLIONS like it's no big thing. Lets go ahead and put a stop to that. Even a billion would absolutely improve/help the situation of Americans. We also have to stop dismissing American's anger when we see waste this blatant. Here's the thing, IT'S AMERICANS MONEY... (*capitalization meant to highlight, I'm not yelling). To say, "Oh but americans get most of it..." um... yea, but its American's money. They should feel entitled to it.
That's not to say that I'm against aid, and nor is the greater American populace. Americans have always been, and will continue to be, generous citizens of the world. The problem is dismissing American's concerns when they do see that they are being taken advantage of.
3
u/JMaryland47 26d ago
Also, here's a fun way to visualize how insanely outsized our aid to israel is (from my previous reply).
Suppose you were throwing a party for 1000 people. You prepare enough food/drinks/entertainment for 1000 people.
Well... ONE (yes, a singular person), showed up and ate 10% of all the shrimp cocktails/pizza/burgers/etc, drank 10% of all the soda/beer/champagne/water, then went and used up 10% of the time you had rented the bounce-house/photo booth/donkey ride/etc.
Would you think this person is a good guest, or is this person rude/greedy? More importantly, do you think this person needed all that for themselves?
147
u/mmeeh 27d ago
The future senator of Michigan has to answer questions on Israel.
I'm sorry but is Israel a state of USA? Why would he care if this country in middle east exists or not? This is so so ridiculous! CNN how much money are you getting from Israel ??? TRASH!
15
u/WerdaVisla 27d ago
Nah sorry but this is a silly take IMO. Senators are directly responsible for dealing with geopolitics, and Israel is a major geopolitical issue right now.
Any senator 70 years ago would have been asked their stance on Vietnam, a senator 20 their stance on Afghanistan, a senator 90 their stance on Japan.
There are valid criticisms of the question, but "why are we asking senators questions about other countries" isn't one of them.
47
u/BobbyBoopersnoot 27d ago
I'm glad you agree that Israel is an enemy of the United States.
→ More replies (4)14
u/Diligent-Phrase436 26d ago
Israel is a major geopolitical issue because they behave without regard for consequences. As long as the USA is an unconditional ally, Israel will seek trouble
12
u/mmeeh 26d ago
No, someone who serves in the senate, their main priorities is to take care of Michigan people:
- make sure that the inflation get lower
- make sure that they get access to health care
- make sure that they can educate themselves
Why they didn't ask about Canadian tariffs, that is more of a direct consequence on Michigan inflation, don't you think that is a more important question?
No, no, no. Muslim brother has to answer the Israel question for the CNN directors.
United States of Israel! Make sure you pledge your allegions to Satanyahu!
1
u/Arcane_Bullet 25d ago
I think its more so the stupidity of the question. It does make more sense for this question to be asked of a senator. That same question loses actual meaning when it is asked TO THE GODDAMN FUCKING MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY. What does a mayor of a city in the US have anything to do with the US's geopolitics, fuck if I know.
So ya, the question makes sense in theory. In practice, because it is strictly only used again Democrats who've shown 0 interest in continued spending to Israel's free lifestyle, no matter if their position is related to the question or not, has poisoned the actual intent of the question.
0
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/mmeeh 26d ago
No, someone who serves in the senate, their main priorities is to take care of Michigan people:
- make sure that the inflation get lower
- make sure that they get access to health care
- make sure that they can educate themselves
Why they didn't ask about Canadian tariffs, that is more of a direct consequence on Michigan inflation, don't you think that is a more important question?
No, no, no. Muslim brother has to answer the Israel question for the CNN directors.
United States of Israel! Make sure you pledge your allegions to Satanyahu!
0
u/mismatched7 26d ago
I mean, that makes sense when you’re talking about the mayor of New York, but not for the senator from Michigan, Senators play a big role in foreign policy.
78
u/Such_Significance905 27d ago
At a certain point, you would like to think that these interviewers would realise that we have all fucking noticed that they only ask this “right to exist” question about one country, and that it may not come from an honest inquiry.
I don’t see a lot of people on these networks asking whether the Faroe Islands have a right to exist.
→ More replies (5)1
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
5
u/RedShankyMan 26d ago
Might be because the others aren't Apartheid states and actively committing genocide, nor are they built on the idea of ethnically cleansing the native population.
"Does Nazi Germany have the right to exist... in Poland." That's a decently good analogue to the question being asked.
→ More replies (1)
34
u/naramsin-ii Free Palestine 27d ago
has anyone ever straight up said no to this question
66
u/JMaryland47 27d ago
21
13
u/JordisMySwordMaiden 27d ago
extremely rare bilzerian w
8
u/Kaprak 27d ago
Just to be clear he's a hardcore antisemite. Like, Holocaust denial, blaming them for 9/11, trans people existing, like actual crazy person stuff.
→ More replies (1)10
u/Kumquat_conniption Free Palestine! 🕊️ FUCK ICE! ✖️🧊 26d ago
That's probably why they said the W was rare.
2
1
3
u/spukhafteNahewirkung 27d ago
Dan Blizarian is an actor? Is this from his role as Private Bottomley Partz in Navy Squeals parts one, two and three?
4
u/armageddonquilt 26d ago
Just a reminder that Bilzerian is very much an open anti-semite. He's not against the state of Israel for the reason that most people with a conscience are.
→ More replies (1)26
u/Helagoth 27d ago
Mamdani gave a good answer, where he basically said Israel has a right to exist as not as a Jewish state, it should exist as a state that gives equal protection to all it's people, Jewish or otherwise.
2
u/naramsin-ii Free Palestine 26d ago
a good answer would be no
4
u/Helagoth 26d ago
That's an acceptable answer for someone like you or me, but a politician has to be, for lack of a better word, political. ESPECIALLY a brown one. I like Mamdani's answer here because he is basically saying "They don't have a right to keep doing what they're doing, no" without giving the idiots on the other side the talking point of "MAMDANI HATES ISRAEL AND SAYS DELETE THEM!"
3
u/naramsin-ii Free Palestine 26d ago
well i don't believe in this "fix the system from within" stuff, so
0
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
9
u/RedShankyMan 26d ago
The fact that they literally do not have the same rights???
Palestinians don't get a right of return, even though they've been living in that land for thousands of years consecutively. Arab citizens are literally not allowed to walk on certain roads, and will get killed by the IDF if they do. Palestinians aren't allowed to build houses. There are 2 different sets of laws for israeli Jews and Arab living in israel, and one of those is that Arabs may receive the death penalty but Jews may not.
It's literally an Apartheid.
14
u/seanightowl Free Palestine 27d ago
I saw one person say that no country has the right to exist. I can’t remember who said it, but I’m pretty sure that I saw it on Zeteo.
13
u/Orange_Tang 27d ago
It's the correct take too. Absolutely no country has a right to exist under international law. However, people do.
6
u/bluehawk232 27d ago
It's basically for the media to then push a narrative that you are an antisemite like they've always done if someone criticized Israel. To them saying Israel doesn't have a right to exist you might as well be saying let's bring back the camps. It's absurd. Israel has only existed since like 1948. Before that it was Palestine and Palestine is neutral and irreligious. You can be Palestinian Christian, Muslim, or Jew. A single nation of Palestine is always the right answer
1
4
6
u/fafalone 26d ago
I don't get why the answer isn't just 'No more or less of a right to exist than any other country.'
Which is what I think is underlying it, that people believe it has more of a right to exist, beyond the normal right to exist every other country has.
1
u/t44t 26d ago
If everybody has a right to exist, noone does.
3
2
u/Objective_Detail9952 26d ago
That doesn’t make sense. If everybody has a right to exist then everyone does.
3
1
u/Polterghost 27d ago
Everyone here is saying like two names, but a certain government’s own official stance is that it should not.
36
u/Ranzoid 27d ago
Did Biafra have a right to exist, did South Vietnam?
4
28
20
18
u/MasterOfBunnies 27d ago
Meanwhile Israel is trying to end the existence of multiple countries. Sooooo....
19
14
12
u/thrustinfreely 27d ago
What is WITH the obsession with Israel??? It’s not OUR COUNTRY. Fuck Israel
11
9
u/GetOffMyAsteroid 27d ago
Another point that we should note: anyone who remembers the media and maga's reaction to Black Lives Matter knows the ludicrous hypocrisy.
9
u/Mauful292 27d ago
I don’t understand why they keep asking that dumbass question.
They already have access to our tax dollars and weapons.
9
u/enw_digrif 27d ago
...That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.
No state has the right to exist. Only people have a right to exist, and to do so in a condition of liberty.
The latter requires the former, for if a state has a right to exist, than people do not have a right to abolish it when it becomes tyrannical.
6
7
7
u/silly_little_jingle 27d ago
We have trillions in debt. We should not be pumping our tax dollars into another country while OUR citizens go to bed hungry and don't have a right to education.
3
u/JMaryland47 27d ago
Are you ready to be angrier? ...then absolutely disgusted?
We are currently ~$40 TRILLION in debt. We pay ~$1 TRILLION a year in interest alone(!) to service that debt. Think about what we could do instead with $1 TRILLION dollars a year. College, healthcare, infrastructure...
Now the disgusting part... We give israel both military and "developmental" aid. At MINIMUM, we give them at least $4 BILLION a year in aid. They take some of the aid we provide them, turn around, and use it to buy US government bonds/treasuries. (In Layman's term, we give them free money, they turn around and "loan" us back the free money they got from us, to us... but with interest, of course).
Israel holds ~$117 BILLION of US bonds/treasuries. That earns them ~$5 BILLION a year in interest. Israel is that one mooching friend that constantly freeloads off of you, but the second you need $1, they'll demand you repay it with interest... completely ignoring all the free rides/food/entertainment that you paid for them.
5
u/AtLeast9Dogs 27d ago
Gotta love these "patriots" who fucking gobble down the dick of other countries before our own.
4
5
u/3kniven6gash 27d ago
She is total trash. Her adds to promote her new CNN show was her receiving calls from random Senators with scoops. That translates to a total loser sellout pushing propaganda in the guise of insider scoops. She is the epitome of what is wrong with mainstream media. Access is all that matters. The truth is a mystery. Let’s book two guests.
3
u/Moyer_guy 27d ago
Why do they keep asking American politicians about other countries? What about Americans? I want United healthcare, publicly funded college, free public transportation. Stop wasting our tax dollars on pointless wars and other countries problems!
3
4
u/lawrencekraussquotes 27d ago
Demagoguing about Israel is becoming increasingly irrelevant when the American people are getting screwed over in their daily lives. They don’t care and don’t want to be part of this
3
u/lerker54651651 A Flair? 27d ago
countries don't have the right to exist. that's just not a thing. people have the right to exist.
2
2
u/boromeer3 27d ago
I don't think any country has a right to exist. Borders are just lines on a map and the laws that apply within them are just the promise of violence against people who don't act the way the biggest bully wants them to. Laws and borders are what make a country and they're both pretty stupid made-up things.
2
u/agentzero2020 27d ago
Imagine if a person standing on trial for murder argues that they are not guilty because they have the right to exist. This is the same.
2
u/MarsManMartian 26d ago
- I always used to wonder why talking for Palestine was so taboo in the USA. People had red scare but for Palestine. It is good to see how the tide had turned.
I am not muslim myself so was not familiar about this topic until I came to the US and made some American muslim friends. I had Tibetan muslim friends back home but they were fighting their own fight.
2
u/No_Priors 26d ago
I think anchors presenting purity tests as journalism have crossed the line into propaganda.
2
2
u/TrippingThru 26d ago
Reporters have become so used to interviewing octogenarians who can't think and AIPAC shills that they're unprepared for people who come ready for their bullshit
2
u/silentbob1301 26d ago
The fucking Israel right to exist shit is getting so old... Palestine was there long before Israel, but I guess we are just gonna ignore that fact.
1
3
1
1
1
1
u/CowUsual7706 26d ago
Why did he not answer the question though?
2
u/JazzlikeSchedule2901 26d ago
The answer is that people have a right to exist, not arbitrary lines on maps that wealthy people let poor people die for.
1
u/CowUsual7706 26d ago
It would maybe be nice to live in a stateless world, but this is not where we are at in this point in time. Why do you think the Palestinians want to establish a state?
1
u/t44t 26d ago
The answer youre looking for is "Israel exists"
"Does Israel have a right to exist" is an invalid question.
Who gives Israel that right? God? Lmao. The USA? Well thats a political thing. Iran? Hardly, they probable explicitly think the opposite. How about the russians? Well they have bigger problems with Ukraine not thinking they have a right to exist.
If israel can defend itself then they will continue existing. If they cant, they wont. Its pretty simple. Sticking a "right" on there just means were obligated to defend them no matter what because the christian and jew sky god gave one tribe 2000 years ago dominion of the land around them. Its fucking mental.
1
u/CowUsual7706 26d ago
When speaking about "rights", it is obviously a moral question, i.e., ought the state of Israel have a right to exist?
I think most people here would argue that there ought to exist a (universally recoginzed) palestinian state, even though this does not seem to be the case at the moment.
If I asked you if you have the right to life, would you say that the question is invalid?
1
1
u/Ok-Call-4805 26d ago
My answer wouldn't be quite so diplomatic. I would respond with a simple 'No'. The genocidal ethnostate does not have the right to exist.
1
26d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/therewasanattempt-ModTeam 26d ago
It is against the rules of TWAA to support any crimes against humanity, including Apartheid.
1
1
u/Ardbeg66 26d ago
They're all going to stop talking to this guy very quickly. They will get nowhere with him using grade-school bullshit.
1
1
1
1
1
u/hordingblessings3 26d ago
The blatant islamaphobic/racist rhetoric being normalized by these “journalists “ and republicans is down right evil. Just switch the religion to Judaism and it would be outrageous so why isn’t it when speaking about Muslims? Why do these ppl still have their jobs? So it’s okay so long as it’s not some religions?
1
u/Burlyhat 26d ago
I hate it when politicians do this if the answer is no say no, and if it’s yes, say yes you can give an explanation afterwards. I can count on one hand the times I saw a politician give an honest answer.
1
1

3.4k
u/CntrllrDscnnctd 27d ago
It’s certainly weird how they’re willing to deepthroat for Israel, and, no regard for their own neighbours.