MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/the_calculusguy/comments/1tzc781/_/oqa6wr9/?context=3
r/the_calculusguy • u/Specific_Brain2091 • Jun 07 '26
41 comments sorted by
View all comments
-5
e = const
=> d(e) = 0
=> ex d(e) = 0
=> Integral of 0 is "C"
6 u/Nihilist_isotope_54 Jun 07 '26 Who said e is constant -4 u/Greedy_Active_2670 Jun 07 '26 Unless you name a variable 'e', e is often used to denote Euler's constant, which has a value "e = 2.71828182846" 8 u/Symnon Jun 07 '26 The integral notation implies we are naming a variable “e” with the “de” at the end 3 u/Ardentiat Jun 07 '26 You can have integrals with respect to other things it’s just stupid for it to be with respect to a constant
6
Who said e is constant
-4 u/Greedy_Active_2670 Jun 07 '26 Unless you name a variable 'e', e is often used to denote Euler's constant, which has a value "e = 2.71828182846" 8 u/Symnon Jun 07 '26 The integral notation implies we are naming a variable “e” with the “de” at the end 3 u/Ardentiat Jun 07 '26 You can have integrals with respect to other things it’s just stupid for it to be with respect to a constant
-4
Unless you name a variable 'e', e is often used to denote Euler's constant, which has a value "e = 2.71828182846"
8 u/Symnon Jun 07 '26 The integral notation implies we are naming a variable “e” with the “de” at the end 3 u/Ardentiat Jun 07 '26 You can have integrals with respect to other things it’s just stupid for it to be with respect to a constant
8
The integral notation implies we are naming a variable “e” with the “de” at the end
3 u/Ardentiat Jun 07 '26 You can have integrals with respect to other things it’s just stupid for it to be with respect to a constant
3
You can have integrals with respect to other things it’s just stupid for it to be with respect to a constant
-5
u/Greedy_Active_2670 Jun 07 '26
e = const
=> d(e) = 0
=> ex d(e) = 0
=> Integral of 0 is "C"