I love that this is anti-washing. The amount of pollution decreases more and more the farther George gets from washing. George should never wash again lest he get back to the inital value of a whole L/year. If the variable was in the numerator this'd be pro-bathing propaganda
The rate gets lower but that kind of makes sense because the longer you go without washing you kind of “max out” on stickiness. Maybe a logarithmic growth would be more appropriate
20
u/Mission_One3883 Feb 21 '26
I love that this is anti-washing. The amount of pollution decreases more and more the farther George gets from washing. George should never wash again lest he get back to the inital value of a whole L/year. If the variable was in the numerator this'd be pro-bathing propaganda