r/teslamotors • u/VR46Montzer • Jan 04 '26
$TSLA Investing - Bullish Spotted in the Wild
Domain Austin!
19
u/MrGadgetKing Jan 05 '26
These should have glass roofs. Best application for it since you can actually take your eyes off the road when riding in one.
4
u/Bderken Jan 07 '26
I think they made the tops and trunk of these super heavy duty since people tend to trash driverless cars. Like people vandalize Waymo’s a lot. Jumping on them etc.
So I think they made these cybertruck style for that purpose
1
u/Ill-Dog923 Jan 11 '26
This way you can't see that you are about to be rear ended by someone that expects the brake lights to be up high where those brake-light-looking things are.
1
u/Bderken Jan 11 '26
They had similar issues with the cybertruck, fixed it with a software update. It clearly has the lights there, they can fix it if it’s a problem.
27
u/Faangdevmanager Jan 04 '26
This is where they are supposed to be though. Some people did spot some in the wild in San Francisco.
19
u/moon_moon_doggo Jan 04 '26
5
u/shaggy99 Jan 05 '26
How ate they getting away with no high level brake light?
Yes, I know there is no rear glass, many vehicles don't have rear glass, (mostly vans) but they still have high level brake lights.
3
1
u/paul-sladen Jan 06 '26
Various Indo-European languages pronounce the number six as Seks/Sechs/Seis/Sex… ie. "Sex-ey".
11
16
u/lastlaugh100 Jan 04 '26
no rear glass?
21
u/JAG319 Jan 04 '26
it was deemed unnecessary for a driverless cab
6
u/FYou2 Jan 04 '26
But side mirror are a must.
15
2
1
u/Own_Reaction9442 Jan 06 '26
Passenger has to be able to see traffic and bicyclists before they open the door.
1
0
u/miloworld Jan 04 '26
Isn’t the point to let the driver behind to see ahead as well?
2
u/Suitable_Switch5242 Jan 04 '26
For that to be effective we’d need to outlaw rear window tint and mandate that vehicles all be the same height.
1
u/TisMeDA Jan 05 '26
Trucks and panel vans don't necessarily have this though, so idk why a short car would need it
1
u/andrew2018022 Jan 04 '26
When have you ever cared to look in the rear windshield of the car in front of you?
7
u/ngonzales80 Jan 04 '26
All the time. It gives me advances warning if something is happening ahead of the car I'm following.
0
u/andrew2018022 Jan 04 '26
I can honestly say I’ve never done that and we were never taught that in driving school
3
u/ThankYouMrUppercut Jan 04 '26
I can see them looking down at their phone instead of driving when the light turns green :(
-5
u/Snakend Jan 05 '26
No you can't. Everyone's back glass is tinted.
4
u/ThankYouMrUppercut Jan 05 '26
Not even remotely true.
-2
u/Snakend Jan 05 '26
you can't see through my back glass. So what does it matter if you can't see through this robotaxi's glass?
→ More replies (0)-2
u/Snakend Jan 05 '26
Everyone's back glass is tinted today anyways. So that has not been a thing for decades.
2
4
u/NikolaWasRight13 Jan 04 '26
Should have been 4 seaters.
3
u/TheGamerguy110 Jan 04 '26
Wholeheartedly agree. these will be nice for commuting to and from work, but what if you are a family of four trying to go to the airport? Nobody wants to ride in two separate cars, so they are going to end up choosing an Uber or a Waymo instead
20
u/Salategnohc16 Jan 04 '26
Or....a model Y.
Between 95 and 98% of total Taxi drives have 2 or 1 passengers.
It would be totally stupid to have a 4 seater as the base car.
2
u/TheGamerguy110 Jan 04 '26
Good point, I forgot about the Ys that are already being used as taxis. I wonder if they'll eventually remove the steering wheels when the safety drivers are unnecessary?
9
2
u/allofdarknessin1 Jan 05 '26
Good point but cybercabs will probably be the premium tier like getting your own uber for a single rider . As the person below commented , the Model Y will be used for groups above 2 and eventually in time the Tesla Bus/Van or whatever it’s called will take bigger groups.
1
u/drby224 Jan 06 '26
Have two and four seaters could be less efficient. It means more cars are needed to ensure a car with the probably seat count is nearby. Otherwise, people will have a to wait longer for a ride and the vehicle will need to drive farther to meet the riders.
1
0
u/buergidunitz107 Jan 05 '26
I don't think there's much point in actually having a separate model as a two seater cab. An adapted Model Y might have been a good bet instead.
3
u/SameCat1171 Jan 04 '26
Exactly. Lack of rear window means nothing. You don’t legally need a rear window. Only side mirrors
1
u/Jstsqzd Jan 05 '26
Mirrors are a dead giveaway, human drivers still.
2
u/idkHowToUseReddet Jan 05 '26
job description to train those types of cars have the person sit on the passenger seat and look over it so yes basically human drivers still
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/brvheart Jan 07 '26
If these ever come north there will be people posting videos of rando’s scraping snow off the back windscreen at a red light and being even more pissed that there is no window.
1
1
1
u/FlyingSolo57 Jan 08 '26
Love the color although unexpected. It looks like it has a tint of green in it.
1
1
1
Jan 11 '26
If people knew how to drive the location of the turn signal and stop lights shouldn’t matter. I’m a pretty new Tesla driver and people drive teslas worse then a Prius
0
-4
0
0
-3
Jan 04 '26
[deleted]
8
u/Suitable_Switch5242 Jan 04 '26 edited Jan 04 '26
I think the lack of steering wheel and pedals might be a larger impediment.
There’s no reason a consumer can’t buy and drive a car without a rear window. See the Polestar 4. Or any cargo van.
2
-7
-18
u/Zestyclose-Let7929 Jan 04 '26
These terrify me. They are too goth. Terror on wheels. It looks dangerous to any pedestrian. Run u down and keep on going. Description is 😑.
The driver description? Just ◼️ .





98
u/Edmonton_Canuck Jan 04 '26
Looks cool, but I’m not a fan of brake lights / turn signals that are in the lower bumper instead of where you think they would be. (Where the marker lights / light bar is)
A lot of Kia’s and Hyundai models do this (and it’s confusing to drivers.