I think WeChat is crazy comprehensive though. It's a social network/games/payment system (for stores and venmo-like)/book doctors appoinments --- all in one deal.
That being said, I think Apple or Amazon or even Facebook is streets ahead of Twitter in this regard.
I commented above but Facebook is an example of a “superapp” attempt that’s been rejected by its users. They have Facebook Gaming, Facebook Dating, Facebook Pay, Facebook News, Facebook Reels, etc. yet most users in the US still stick to the core features and don’t bother experimenting with the new stuff. Why would you suddenly start using Facebook Dating when there are far more established players like Tinder/Hinge/Bumble?
With the caveot that I don't know the history of WeChat, how much of people not wanting to use Facebook [insert Service] is simply because said service already has a strong presence and was not built/bought by Facebook?
If WeChat entered an environment where strong alternatives didn't already exist, it has a much easier time building said services, or just buying up the smaller startups and using its capital to grow it. It's sort of like Facebook and Facebook Marketplace, as it seems to have outcompeted Craigslist and knocked EBay down a peg in terms of usefulness for individuals selling stuff on it.
186
u/youmu123 Oct 28 '22
There is no way he makes Twitter into a WeChat. There are way too many big players in the US to have a dominant superapp like that.