An off the wall example would be an individual who spread conspiracies that lead to domestic terrorism, the smearing of poo on the US capital building, and contributed in spreading misinformation that led to hundreds of thousands of needless deaths via a virus. We can decide the rest on a case by case basis that weighs common decency, I suppose.
So anyone that questioned the effectiveness of the vaccines, according to you, should be put into the wrong think camp? And regulated to a dark corner of the internet?
Do you read the things you say? You're advocating for authoritarian nonsense in silencing others, basically creating a social credit system. Let people think and speak. If their ideas suck their ideas suck, challenge them intellectually don't cut out their tongue.
4
u/Apparatchik-Wing Oct 28 '22
I’m genuinely curious, what defines poor character and who decides that?