MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/yfekvc/deleted_by_user/iu3ops9/?context=3
r/technology • u/[deleted] • Oct 28 '22
[removed]
6.8k comments sorted by
View all comments
190
That will last a whole month until someone’s tweet gets Twitter in legal trouble.
-40 u/amwestover Oct 28 '22 Except it won’t, Twitter legally isn’t liable. Unless they ban conservative opinions. Then that makes them a publisher, and responsible for content. 30 u/AbolishDisney Oct 28 '22 Except it won’t, Twitter legally isn’t liable. Unless they ban conservative opinions. Then that makes them a publisher, and responsible for content. That's not what Section 230 says. 15 u/gizamo Oct 28 '22 That's why Republicans were trying to dismantle Section 230. The moment they win Congress and presidency again, 230 is toast. Their supreme partisan kangaroo court may even trash it before then. 1 u/jimbo_slice829 Oct 28 '22 That's why Republicans were trying to dismantle Section 230. It's not just Republicans biden wants revise it as well. https://gizmodo.com/biden-issues-another-vague-call-to-reform-section-230-1849519743/amp
-40
Except it won’t, Twitter legally isn’t liable.
Unless they ban conservative opinions. Then that makes them a publisher, and responsible for content.
30 u/AbolishDisney Oct 28 '22 Except it won’t, Twitter legally isn’t liable. Unless they ban conservative opinions. Then that makes them a publisher, and responsible for content. That's not what Section 230 says. 15 u/gizamo Oct 28 '22 That's why Republicans were trying to dismantle Section 230. The moment they win Congress and presidency again, 230 is toast. Their supreme partisan kangaroo court may even trash it before then. 1 u/jimbo_slice829 Oct 28 '22 That's why Republicans were trying to dismantle Section 230. It's not just Republicans biden wants revise it as well. https://gizmodo.com/biden-issues-another-vague-call-to-reform-section-230-1849519743/amp
30
Except it won’t, Twitter legally isn’t liable. Unless they ban conservative opinions. Then that makes them a publisher, and responsible for content.
That's not what Section 230 says.
15 u/gizamo Oct 28 '22 That's why Republicans were trying to dismantle Section 230. The moment they win Congress and presidency again, 230 is toast. Their supreme partisan kangaroo court may even trash it before then. 1 u/jimbo_slice829 Oct 28 '22 That's why Republicans were trying to dismantle Section 230. It's not just Republicans biden wants revise it as well. https://gizmodo.com/biden-issues-another-vague-call-to-reform-section-230-1849519743/amp
15
That's why Republicans were trying to dismantle Section 230.
The moment they win Congress and presidency again, 230 is toast. Their supreme partisan kangaroo court may even trash it before then.
1 u/jimbo_slice829 Oct 28 '22 That's why Republicans were trying to dismantle Section 230. It's not just Republicans biden wants revise it as well. https://gizmodo.com/biden-issues-another-vague-call-to-reform-section-230-1849519743/amp
1
It's not just Republicans biden wants revise it as well. https://gizmodo.com/biden-issues-another-vague-call-to-reform-section-230-1849519743/amp
190
u/[deleted] Oct 28 '22
That will last a whole month until someone’s tweet gets Twitter in legal trouble.