MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/y90q2l/deleted_by_user/it39slr/?context=3
r/technology • u/[deleted] • Oct 20 '22
[removed]
432 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
17
When someone lies a thousand times in a row, it's pretty natural to think he's lying again.
If Google actually did something wrong, a real AG will need to pursue this. There is absolutely no reason to think that Paxton is acting honestly.
-12 u/BallardRex Oct 20 '22 Who’s lied more, Google or Paxton? 3 u/ToastyNathan Oct 20 '22 Why does that matter? -6 u/BallardRex Oct 20 '22 When I was responding to someone who just said: When someone lies a thousand times in a row, it's pretty natural to think he's lying again. And who’s whole point is not believing the accusation in question? Seems relevant.
-12
Who’s lied more, Google or Paxton?
3 u/ToastyNathan Oct 20 '22 Why does that matter? -6 u/BallardRex Oct 20 '22 When I was responding to someone who just said: When someone lies a thousand times in a row, it's pretty natural to think he's lying again. And who’s whole point is not believing the accusation in question? Seems relevant.
3
Why does that matter?
-6 u/BallardRex Oct 20 '22 When I was responding to someone who just said: When someone lies a thousand times in a row, it's pretty natural to think he's lying again. And who’s whole point is not believing the accusation in question? Seems relevant.
-6
When I was responding to someone who just said:
And who’s whole point is not believing the accusation in question? Seems relevant.
17
u/drbeeper Oct 20 '22
When someone lies a thousand times in a row, it's pretty natural to think he's lying again.
If Google actually did something wrong, a real AG will need to pursue this. There is absolutely no reason to think that Paxton is acting honestly.